Skip to content

GHSA-gp2f-7wcm-5fhx CVE-2026-27127

Craft CMS has Cloud Metadata SSRF Protection Bypass via DNS Rebinding

Medium Packagist
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.49%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 41.99% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition
Fix
5.8.23
Upgrade craftcms/cms to this version or later

Description

Summary

The SSRF validation in Craft CMS’s GraphQL Asset mutation performs DNS resolution separately from the HTTP request. This Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability enables DNS rebinding attacks, where an attacker’s DNS server returns different IP addresses for validation compared to the actual request.

This is a bypass of the security fix for CVE-2025-68437 (GHSA-x27p-wfqw-hfcc) that allows access to all blocked IPs, not just IPv6 endpoints.

Severity

Bypass of cloud metadata SSRF protection for all blocked IPs

Required Permissions

Exploitation requires GraphQL schema permissions for:

  • Edit assets in the <VolumeName> volume
  • Create assets in the <VolumeName> volume

These permissions may be granted to:

  • Authenticated users with appropriate GraphQL schema access
  • Public Schema (if misconfigured with write permissions)

Technical Details

Vulnerable Code Flow

The code at src/gql/resolvers/mutations/Asset.php performs two separate DNS lookups:

// VALIDATION PHASE: First DNS resolution at time T1
private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
    $hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
    $ip = gethostbyname($hostname);  // DNS Lookup #1 - Returns safe IP

    if (in_array($ip, [
        '169.254.169.254',   // AWS, GCP, Azure IMDS
        '169.254.170.2',     // AWS ECS metadata
        '100.100.100.200',   // Alibaba Cloud
        '192.0.0.192',       // Oracle Cloud
    ])) {
        return false;  // Check passes - IP looks safe
    }
    return true;
}

// ... time gap between validation and request ...

// REQUEST PHASE: Second DNS resolution at time T2 (inside Guzzle)
$response = $client->get($url);  // DNS Lookup #2 - Guzzle resolves DNS AGAIN
                                  // Now returns 169.254.169.254!

Root Cause

Two separate DNS lookups occur:

  1. Validation: gethostbyname() in validateHostname()
  2. Request: Guzzle's internal DNS resolution via libcurl

An attacker controlling a DNS server can return different IPs for each query.

Bypass Mechanism

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Attacker's DNS Server: evil.attacker.com                                    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 1 (Validation - T1):                                                  |
|   Request:  A record for evil.attacker.com                                  |
|   Response: 1.2.3.4 (safe IP, TTL: 0)                                       |
|   Result:   Validation PASSES                                               |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 2 (Guzzle Request - T2):                                              |
|   Request:  A record for evil.attacker.com                                  |
|   Response: 169.254.169.254 (metadata IP, TTL: 0)                           |
|   Result:   Request goes to blocked IP -> CREDENTIALS STOLEN                |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Target Endpoints via DNS Rebinding

DNS rebinding allows access to all blocked IPs:

Target Rebind To Impact
AWS IMDS 169.254.169.254 IAM credentials, instance identity
AWS ECS 169.254.170.2 Container credentials
GCP Metadata 169.254.169.254 Service account tokens
Azure Metadata 169.254.169.254 Managed identity tokens
Alibaba Cloud 100.100.100.200 Instance credentials
Oracle Cloud 192.0.0.192 Instance metadata
Internal Services 127.0.0.1, 10.x.x.x Internal APIs, databases

Attack Scenario

  1. Attacker sets up DNS server with alternating responses
  2. Attacker sends mutation with url: "http://evil.attacker.com/latest/meta-data/"
  3. First DNS query returns safe IP (e.g., 1.2.3.4) → validation passes
  4. Second DNS query returns metadata IP (169.254.169.254) → request to metadata
  5. Attacker retrieves credentials from ANY cloud provider
  6. Attacker can now achieve code execution by creating new instances with their SSH key

Remediation

Fix: DNS Pinning with CURLOPT_RESOLVE

Pin the DNS resolution - use the same resolved IP for both validation and request:

private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
    $hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);

    // Resolve once
    $ip = gethostbyname($hostname);

    // Validate the resolved IP
    if (in_array($ip, [
        '169.254.169.254', '169.254.170.2',
        '100.100.100.200', '192.0.0.192',
    ])) {
        return false;
    }

    // Store for later use
    $this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] = $ip;

    return true;
}

// When making the request - CRITICAL: Use pinned IP
protected function makeRequest(string $url): ResponseInterface
{
    $hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
    $ip = $this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] ?? null;

    $options = [];
    if ($ip) {
        // Force Guzzle/curl to use the SAME IP we validated
        $options['curl'] = [
            CURLOPT_RESOLVE => [
                "$hostname:80:$ip",
                "$hostname:443:$ip"
            ]
        ];
    }

    return $this->client->get($url, $options);
}

Alternative: Single Resolution with Immediate Use

// Resolve to IP and use IP directly in URL
$ip = gethostbyname($hostname);

if (in_array($ip, $blockedIPs)) {
    return false;
}

// Make request directly to IP with Host header
$client->get("http://$ip" . parse_url($url, PHP_URL_PATH), [
    'headers' => [
        'Host' => $hostname
    ]
]);

Additional Mitigations

Mitigation Description
DNS Pinning (CURLOPT_RESOLVE) Force same IP for validation and request
Single IP-based request Use resolved IP directly in URL
Implement IMDSv2 Requires token header (infrastructure-level)
Network egress filtering Block metadata IPs at network level

Resources

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
craftcms/cms
>= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.8.23
5.8.23
craftcms/cms
>= 3.5.0, < 4.16.19
4.16.19

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

craftcms/cms Packagist → 5.8.23

composer
composer require craftcms/cms:^5.8.23

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
High
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 6.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition

The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: The most basic advice for TOCTOU vulnerabilities is to not perform a check before the use. This does not resolve the underlying issue of the execution of a function on a resource whose state and identity cannot be assured, but it does help to limit the false sense of security given by the check.
  • Implementation: When the file being altered is owned by the current user and group, set the effective gid and uid to that of the current user and group when executing this statement.
  • Architecture and Design: Limit the interleaving of operations on files from multiple processes.
  • Implementation, Architecture and Design: If you cannot perform operations atomically and you must share access to the resource between multiple processes or threads, then try to limit the amount of time (CPU cycles) between the check and use of the resource. This will not fix the problem, but it could make it more difficult for an attack to succeed.
  • Implementation: Recheck the resource after the use call to verify that the action was taken appropriately.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that some environmental locking mechanism can be used to protect resources effectively.
  • Implementation: Ensure that locking occurs before the check, as opposed to afterwards, such that the resource, as checked, is the same as it is when in use.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7vrx-9684-xrf2
Craft CMS stores arbitrary content provided by unauthenticated users in session files
Medium Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-f3gw-9ww9-jmc3
Craft CMS Allows Remote Code Execution
Critical Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-x684-96hh-833x
Craft CMS has a potential RCE with a compromised security key
High Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-2p6p-9rc9-62j9
Craft CMS has potential RCE when PHP `register_argc_argv` config setting is enabled
Critical Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-wg23-69c2-gjc8
Craft CMS: Passkey login accepts replayed WebAuthn assertions
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-957r-qf9p-67xw
Craft CMS: Arbitrary file read via SplFileObject in non-sandboxed template contexts
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-596p-6jv8-775v
Craft CMS: Authenticated leak of secret environment variables
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-xxpx-f366-4xpq
Craft CMS: Authorization bypass: view-only Categories user can modify category structure via structures/move-element
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor