GHSA-gp2f-7wcm-5fhx CVE-2026-27127
Craft CMS has Cloud Metadata SSRF Protection Bypass via DNS Rebinding
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.49%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 41.99% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition
- Fix
5.8.23- Upgrade craftcms/cms to this version or later
Description
Summary
The SSRF validation in Craft CMS’s GraphQL Asset mutation performs DNS resolution separately from the HTTP request. This Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability enables DNS rebinding attacks, where an attacker’s DNS server returns different IP addresses for validation compared to the actual request.
This is a bypass of the security fix for CVE-2025-68437 (GHSA-x27p-wfqw-hfcc) that allows access to all blocked IPs, not just IPv6 endpoints.
Severity
Bypass of cloud metadata SSRF protection for all blocked IPs
Required Permissions
Exploitation requires GraphQL schema permissions for:
- Edit assets in the
<VolumeName>volume - Create assets in the
<VolumeName>volume
These permissions may be granted to:
- Authenticated users with appropriate GraphQL schema access
- Public Schema (if misconfigured with write permissions)
Technical Details
Vulnerable Code Flow
The code at src/gql/resolvers/mutations/Asset.php performs two separate DNS lookups:
// VALIDATION PHASE: First DNS resolution at time T1
private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
$hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
$ip = gethostbyname($hostname); // DNS Lookup #1 - Returns safe IP
if (in_array($ip, [
'169.254.169.254', // AWS, GCP, Azure IMDS
'169.254.170.2', // AWS ECS metadata
'100.100.100.200', // Alibaba Cloud
'192.0.0.192', // Oracle Cloud
])) {
return false; // Check passes - IP looks safe
}
return true;
}
// ... time gap between validation and request ...
// REQUEST PHASE: Second DNS resolution at time T2 (inside Guzzle)
$response = $client->get($url); // DNS Lookup #2 - Guzzle resolves DNS AGAIN
// Now returns 169.254.169.254!
Root Cause
Two separate DNS lookups occur:
- Validation:
gethostbyname()invalidateHostname() - Request: Guzzle's internal DNS resolution via libcurl
An attacker controlling a DNS server can return different IPs for each query.
Bypass Mechanism
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Attacker's DNS Server: evil.attacker.com |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 1 (Validation - T1): |
| Request: A record for evil.attacker.com |
| Response: 1.2.3.4 (safe IP, TTL: 0) |
| Result: Validation PASSES |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Query 2 (Guzzle Request - T2): |
| Request: A record for evil.attacker.com |
| Response: 169.254.169.254 (metadata IP, TTL: 0) |
| Result: Request goes to blocked IP -> CREDENTIALS STOLEN |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Target Endpoints via DNS Rebinding
DNS rebinding allows access to all blocked IPs:
| Target | Rebind To | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| AWS IMDS | 169.254.169.254 |
IAM credentials, instance identity |
| AWS ECS | 169.254.170.2 |
Container credentials |
| GCP Metadata | 169.254.169.254 |
Service account tokens |
| Azure Metadata | 169.254.169.254 |
Managed identity tokens |
| Alibaba Cloud | 100.100.100.200 |
Instance credentials |
| Oracle Cloud | 192.0.0.192 |
Instance metadata |
| Internal Services | 127.0.0.1, 10.x.x.x |
Internal APIs, databases |
Attack Scenario
- Attacker sets up DNS server with alternating responses
- Attacker sends mutation with
url: "http://evil.attacker.com/latest/meta-data/" - First DNS query returns safe IP (e.g.,
1.2.3.4) → validation passes - Second DNS query returns metadata IP (
169.254.169.254) → request to metadata - Attacker retrieves credentials from ANY cloud provider
- Attacker can now achieve code execution by creating new instances with their SSH key
Remediation
Fix: DNS Pinning with CURLOPT_RESOLVE
Pin the DNS resolution - use the same resolved IP for both validation and request:
private function validateHostname(string $url): bool
{
$hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
// Resolve once
$ip = gethostbyname($hostname);
// Validate the resolved IP
if (in_array($ip, [
'169.254.169.254', '169.254.170.2',
'100.100.100.200', '192.0.0.192',
])) {
return false;
}
// Store for later use
$this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] = $ip;
return true;
}
// When making the request - CRITICAL: Use pinned IP
protected function makeRequest(string $url): ResponseInterface
{
$hostname = parse_url($url, PHP_URL_HOST);
$ip = $this->pinnedDNS[$hostname] ?? null;
$options = [];
if ($ip) {
// Force Guzzle/curl to use the SAME IP we validated
$options['curl'] = [
CURLOPT_RESOLVE => [
"$hostname:80:$ip",
"$hostname:443:$ip"
]
];
}
return $this->client->get($url, $options);
}
Alternative: Single Resolution with Immediate Use
// Resolve to IP and use IP directly in URL
$ip = gethostbyname($hostname);
if (in_array($ip, $blockedIPs)) {
return false;
}
// Make request directly to IP with Host header
$client->get("http://$ip" . parse_url($url, PHP_URL_PATH), [
'headers' => [
'Host' => $hostname
]
]);
Additional Mitigations
| Mitigation | Description |
|---|---|
| DNS Pinning (CURLOPT_RESOLVE) | Force same IP for validation and request |
| Single IP-based request | Use resolved IP directly in URL |
| Implement IMDSv2 | Requires token header (infrastructure-level) |
| Network egress filtering | Block metadata IPs at network level |
Resources
- https://github.com/craftcms/cms/commit/a4cf3fb63bba3249cf1e2882b18a2d29e77a8575
- GHSA-x27p-wfqw-hfcc - Original SSRF vulnerability (CVE-2025-68437)
- DNSrebinder - Lightweight Python DNS server for testing DNS rebinding vulnerabilities; responds with legitimate IP for first N queries, then rebinds to target IP
- Singularity DNS Rebinding Tool
- rbndr DNS Rebinding Service
- DNS Rebinding Attacks Explained
- CURLOPT_RESOLVE Documentation
- OWASP SSRF Prevention Cheat Sheet
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| craftcms/cms | >= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.8.23 |
5.8.23 |
| craftcms/cms | >= 3.5.0, < 4.16.19 |
4.16.19 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
craftcms/cms Packagist → 5.8.23
- composer
composer require craftcms/cms:^5.8.23
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Attack requirements
- Present
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- High
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 6.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition
The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: The most basic advice for TOCTOU vulnerabilities is to not perform a check before the use. This does not resolve the underlying issue of the execution of a function on a resource whose state and identity cannot be assured, but it does help to limit the false sense of security given by the check.
- Implementation: When the file being altered is owned by the current user and group, set the effective gid and uid to that of the current user and group when executing this statement.
- Architecture and Design: Limit the interleaving of operations on files from multiple processes.
- Implementation, Architecture and Design: If you cannot perform operations atomically and you must share access to the resource between multiple processes or threads, then try to limit the amount of time (CPU cycles) between the check and use of the resource. This will not fix the problem, but it could make it more difficult for an attack to succeed.
- Implementation: Recheck the resource after the use call to verify that the action was taken appropriately.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that some environmental locking mechanism can be used to protect resources effectively.
- Implementation: Ensure that locking occurs before the check, as opposed to afterwards, such that the resource, as checked, is the same as it is when in use.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
- github.com/craftcms/cms/security/advisories/GHSA-gp2f-7wcm-5fhx
- github.com/craftcms/cms/security/advisories/GHSA-x27p-wfqw-hfcc
- github.com/craftcms/cms/commit/a4cf3fb63bba3249cf1e2882b18a2d29e77a8575
- curl.se/libcurl/c/CURLOPT_RESOLVE.html
- github.com/mogwailabs/DNSrebinder
- github.com/nccgroup/singularity
- github.com/taviso/rbndr
- unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/dns-rebinding
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-7vrx-9684-xrf2 Craft CMS stores arbitrary content provided by unauthenticated users in session files | Medium Known exploited | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-f3gw-9ww9-jmc3 Craft CMS Allows Remote Code Execution | Critical Known exploited | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-x684-96hh-833x Craft CMS has a potential RCE with a compromised security key | High Known exploited | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-2p6p-9rc9-62j9 Craft CMS has potential RCE when PHP `register_argc_argv` config setting is enabled | Critical Known exploited | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-wg23-69c2-gjc8 Craft CMS: Passkey login accepts replayed WebAuthn assertions | Medium | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-957r-qf9p-67xw Craft CMS: Arbitrary file read via SplFileObject in non-sandboxed template contexts | Medium | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-596p-6jv8-775v Craft CMS: Authenticated leak of secret environment variables | Medium | Also affects craftcms/cms |
| GHSA-xxpx-f366-4xpq Craft CMS: Authorization bypass: view-only Categories user can modify category structure via structures/move-element | Medium | Also affects craftcms/cms |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor