GHSA-gmfw-g93r-vg53 CVE-2026-59715 PYSEC-2026-3599
Open WebUI: Unauthenticated WebSocket Access to Collaborative Document Handlers (ydoc:awareness:update, ydoc:document:leave)
- Severity
- 3.1 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.36%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 30.08% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function
- Fix
0.10.0- Upgrade open-webui to this version or later
Description
Summary
The Socket.IO server is configured with always_connect=True (lines 78, 91 in backend/open_webui/socket/main.py) and the connect handler (line 329) never rejects unauthenticated connections. Two Ydoc event handlers have zero authentication checks, allowing unauthenticated clients to interact with collaborative document sessions.
Vulnerable Code
ydoc:awareness:update (line 741) — No auth check at all
@sio.on('ydoc:awareness:update')
async def yjs_awareness_update(sid, data):
document_id = data['document_id']
user_id = data.get('user_id', sid)
update = data['update']
# No SESSION_POOL check, no room membership check
await sio.emit(
'ydoc:awareness:update',
{'document_id': document_id, 'user_id': user_id, 'update': update},
room=f'doc_{document_id}',
skip_sid=sid,
)
ydoc:document:leave (line 711) — No auth check at all
@sio.on('ydoc:document:leave')
async def yjs_document_leave(sid, data):
document_id = data['document_id']
user_id = data.get('user_id', sid)
# No auth check
await YDOC_MANAGER.remove_user(document_id=document_id, user_id=sid)
await sio.emit('ydoc:user:left',
{'document_id': document_id, 'user_id': user_id},
room=f'doc_{document_id}')
Root Cause: always_connect=True (line 78)
sio = socketio.AsyncServer(
always_connect=True, # Never rejects connections
...
)
The connect handler (line 329) adds authenticated users to SESSION_POOL but never returns False or raises an exception for unauthenticated connections.
Exploitation
- An unauthenticated attacker connects via Socket.IO (no token needed)
- The attacker emits
ydoc:awareness:updatewith:document_id: a known/guessed note UUID (format:note:{uuid})user_id: spoofed to impersonate any userupdate: arbitrary awareness data (fake cursor positions, selections)
- The fake awareness data is broadcast to all legitimate users in the document room
- The attacker can also emit
ydoc:document:leavewith spoofeduser_idto broadcast fakeydoc:user:leftevents
Impact
- UI disruption: Fake cursor positions and user presence in collaborative editing sessions
- User impersonation: Attacker can spoof any
user_idin awareness updates - Resource exhaustion: Unlimited unauthenticated WebSocket connections maintained by the server
Note: Other Ydoc handlers (ydoc:document:join, ydoc:document:update, ydoc:document:state) correctly check SESSION_POOL membership.
Suggested Fix
- Set
always_connect=Falseor reject unauthenticated connections in theconnecthandler - Add
SESSION_POOLchecks toydoc:awareness:updateandydoc:document:leave - Add room membership verification before broadcasting to document rooms
AI Disclosure (per Rule 11): AI (Claude) was used to assist with source code review, identifying potential vulnerability patterns, and drafting this report. The researcher directed the analysis, selected focus areas, and independently verified all findings against a running v0.8.12 Docker instance using real HTTP requests with two test accounts. The PoCs included are reproducible and were confirmed live before submission.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| open-webui | >= 0.6.16, < 0.10.0 |
0.10.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
open-webui PyPI → 0.10.0
- pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webui>=0.10.0"- poetry
poetry add "open-webui>=0.10.0"- uv
uv add "open-webui>=0.10.0"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability. Identify all potential communication channels, or other means of interaction with the software, to ensure that all channels are appropriately protected, including those channels that are assumed to be accessible only by authorized parties. Developers sometimes perform authentication at the primary channel, but open up a secondary channel that is assumed to be private. For example, a login mechanism may be listening on one network port, but after successful authentication, it may open up a second port where it waits for the connection, but avoids authentication because it assumes that only the authenticated party will connect to the port. In general, if the software or protocol allows a single session or user state to persist across multiple connections or channels, authentication and appropriate credential management need to be used throughout.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment. These capabilities may avoid common weaknesses that are unique to authentication; support automatic auditing and tracking; and make it easier to provide a clear separation between authentication tasks and authorization tasks. In environments such as the World Wide Web, the line between authentication and authorization is sometimes blurred. If custom authentication routines are required instead of those provided by the server, then these routines must be applied to every single page, since these pages could be requested directly.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using libraries with authentication capabilities such as OpenSSL or the ESAPI Authenticator [REF-45].
- Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to require strong authentication for users who should be allowed to access the data [REF-1297] [REF-1298] [REF-1302].
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-wvm9-9g5j-623f Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth role policy can still sign in via token exchange | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-4qg5-cxx4-g927 Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth domain allowlist or role policy can still sign in via token exchange | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-jqhh-cjmq-vmv6 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via a cyclic chat message history | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-34r3-9m95-vq73 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can reach the Azure platform channel via server-side web fetch | High | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-2724-6cpj-gf3v Open WebUI: Non-admin users can delete admin-owned external knowledge connections via knowledge base deletion | High | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-3pf7-q2g3-wj28 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can inject chats into another user's folder via chat completions | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor