Skip to content

GHSA-g6q9-8fvw-f7rf CVE-2026-26322

OpenClaw Gateway tool allowed unrestricted gatewayUrl override

High npm
Severity
7.6 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.37%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 31.40% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Fix
2026.2.14
Upgrade openclaw to this version or later

Description

Summary

The Gateway tool accepted a tool-supplied gatewayUrl without sufficient restrictions, which could cause the OpenClaw host to attempt outbound WebSocket connections to user-specified targets.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Affected versions: <= 2026.2.13
  • Patched versions: >= 2026.2.14 (planned)

What Is Needed To Trigger This

This requires the ability to invoke tools that accept gatewayUrl overrides (directly or indirectly). In typical setups this is limited to authenticated operators, trusted automation, or environments where tool calls are exposed to non-operators.

In other words, this is not a drive-by issue for arbitrary internet users unless a deployment explicitly allows untrusted users to trigger these tool calls.

Details

Some tool call paths allowed gatewayUrl overrides to flow into the Gateway WebSocket client without validation or allowlisting. This meant the host could be instructed to attempt connections to non-gateway endpoints (for example, localhost services, private network addresses, or cloud metadata IPs).

Impact

In the common case, this results in an outbound connection attempt from the OpenClaw host (and corresponding errors/timeouts). In environments where the tool caller can observe the results, this can also be used for limited network reachability probing. If the target speaks WebSocket and is reachable, further interaction may be possible.

Fix

Tool-supplied gatewayUrl overrides are now restricted to loopback (on the configured gateway port) or the configured gateway.remote.url. Disallowed protocols, credentials, query/hash, and non-root paths are rejected.

Fix Commit(s)

  • c5406e1d2434be2ef6eb4d26d8f1798d718713f4

Release Process Note

patched_versions is set to the planned next release. Once the npm release is published, the advisory can be published without further edits.

Thanks @p80n-sec for reporting.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
openclaw
< 2026.2.14
2026.2.14

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

openclaw npm → 2026.2.14

npm
npm install openclaw@2026.2.14
yarn
yarn add openclaw@2026.2.14
pnpm
pnpm add openclaw@2026.2.14

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-3x84-qq85-fj65
OpenClaw: Browser CDP discovery could accept blocked WebSocket URLs
High Also affects openclaw
GHSA-9c3v-684m-579c
OpenClaw MCP SSE redirects could forward Authorization headers
Medium Also affects openclaw
GHSA-f397-5vjw-v2c2
OpenClaw: Shell inline-command parsing could miss an allowlist check
High Also affects openclaw
GHSA-rx78-29qr-5hq8
OpenClaw: Workspace-derived service PATH could influence trash command selection
High Also affects openclaw
GHSA-ccwh-wwpp-6wg5
OpenClaw: Host environment sanitizer missed two Node.js control variables
High Also affects openclaw
GHSA-985f-72mj-8gf7
OpenClaw: Tool group policy callers could accept unvalidated group IDs
Medium Also affects openclaw
GHSA-9v8j-9c9g-w66c
OpenClaw: Bootstrap token replay could widen pending pairing scopes
Medium Also affects openclaw
GHSA-c226-q6fx-6j6c
OpenClaw: macOS Swift exec allowlist missed combined POSIX inline flags
Medium Also affects openclaw
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor