Skip to content

GHSA-g4mx-q9vg-27p4 CVE-2023-45803 PYSEC-2023-212

urllib3's request body not stripped after redirect from 303 status changes request method to GET

Medium PyPI
Severity
5.7 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.59%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 48.36% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Fix
2.0.7
Upgrade urllib3 to this version or later

Description

urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 303 "See Other" after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like POST) to GET as is required by HTTP RFCs. Although the behavior of removing the request body is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers.

From RFC 9110 Section 9.3.1:

A client SHOULD NOT generate content in a GET request unless it is made directly to an origin server that has previously indicated, in or out of band, that such a request has a purpose and will be adequately supported.

Affected usages

Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable.

Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability:

  • If you're using urllib3 and submitting sensitive information in the HTTP request body (such as form data or JSON)
  • The origin service is compromised and starts redirecting using 303 to a malicious peer or the redirected-to service becomes compromised.

Remediation

You can remediate this vulnerability with any of the following steps:

  • Upgrade to a patched version of urllib3 (v1.26.18 or v2.0.7)
  • Disable redirects for services that you aren't expecting to respond with redirects with redirects=False.
  • Disable automatic redirects with redirects=False and handle 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
urllib3
>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.7
2.0.7
urllib3
< 1.26.18
1.26.18
urllib3
>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.7
2.0.7
urllib3
< 1.26.18
1.26.18
urllib3
>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.7
< 1.26.18
1.26.18
2.0.7

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

urllib3 PyPI → 2.0.7

pip
pip install --upgrade "urllib3>=2.0.7"
poetry
poetry add "urllib3>=2.0.7"
uv
uv add "urllib3>=2.0.7"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 5.7

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 4.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Adjacent
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-vxq7-64xx-v4gw
urllib3: HTTPResponse.stream()/read_chunked() buffers an unbounded chunk-size line into memory
High Also affects urllib3
GHSA-gh4c-6fx4-qh6g
urllib3: Chunked Deflate streaming can enter an infinite loop
Medium Also affects urllib3
GHSA-8988-9cw3-xx77
urllib3: HTTPS proxy TLS configuration may be ignored or overridden
High Also affects urllib3
GHSA-mf9v-mfxr-j63j
urllib3: Decompression-bomb safeguards bypassed in parts of the streaming API
High Also affects urllib3
GHSA-qccp-gfcp-xxvc
urllib3: Sensitive headers forwarded across origins in proxied low-level redirects
High Also affects urllib3
GHSA-38jv-5279-wg99
Decompression-bomb safeguards bypassed when following HTTP redirects (streaming API)
High Also affects urllib3
GHSA-2xpw-w6gg-jr37
urllib3 streaming API improperly handles highly compressed data
High Also affects urllib3
GHSA-gm62-xv2j-4w53
urllib3 allows an unbounded number of links in the decompression chain
High Also affects urllib3

Credits: Hacked36, illia-v, ranjit-git, sethmlarson

Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor