GHSA-fpj4-9qhx-5m6m CVE-2026-40305
DNN: Force Friend Request Acceptance
- Severity
- 4.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.18%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 7.90% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-285 Improper Authorization
- Fix
10.2.2- Upgrade DotNetNuke.Core to this version or later
Description
DNN (formerly DotNetNuke) is an open-source web content management platform (CMS) in the Microsoft ecosystem. Starting in version 6.0.0 and prior to version 10.2.2, in the friends feature, a user could craft a request that would force the acceptance of a friend request on another user. Version 10.2.2 patches the issue.
Affected versions
NuGet
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| DotNetNuke.Core | >= 6.0.0, < 10.2.2 |
10.2.2 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
DotNetNuke.Core NuGet → 10.2.2
- dotnet
dotnet add package DotNetNuke.Core --version 10.2.2
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 4.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-285: Improper Authorization
The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-18325 Inadequate Encryption Strength in DotNetNuke | High Known exploited | Also affects DotNetNuke.Core |
| CVE-2018-15811 Inadequate Encryption Strength in DotNetNuke | High Known exploited | Also affects DotNetNuke.Core |
| GHSA-x2rg-fmcv-crq5 DNN (aka DotNetNuke) has Remote Code Execution via a cookie | High Known exploited | Also affects DotNetNuke.Core |
| GHSA-fcpv-w245-r2q7 DotNetNuke.Core security code analysis rules triggered | Low | Also affects DotNetNuke.Core |
| GHSA-2rhw-gw3f-477j DNN: Same HostGUID for all new installs | Medium | Also affects DotNetNuke.Core |
| GHSA-ffq7-898w-9jc4 DotNetNuke.Core has stored cross-site-scripting (XSS) via SVG upload | High | Also affects DotNetNuke.Core |
| GHSA-w9pf-h6m6-v89h DotNetNuke.Core Vulnerable to Stored XSS via Module Title | Medium | Also affects DotNetNuke.Core |
| GHSA-vm5q-8qww-h238 DotNetNuke.Core Vulnerable to Stored XSS in Module Deletion Confirmation Modal | Medium | Also affects DotNetNuke.Core |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor