Skip to content

GHSA-fp4x-ggrf-wmc6 CVE-2026-86205

H3 has an Open Redirect via Protocol-Relative Path in redirectBack() Referer Validation

Medium npm
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.27%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 19.36% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-601 URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
Fix
2.0.1-rc.18
Upgrade h3 to this version or later

Description

Summary

The redirectBack() utility in h3 validates that the Referer header shares the same origin as the request before using its pathname as the redirect Location. However, the pathname is not sanitized for protocol-relative paths (starting with //). An attacker can craft a same-origin URL with a double-slash path segment that passes the origin check but produces a Location header interpreted by browsers as a protocol-relative redirect to an external domain.

Details

The vulnerable code is in src/utils/response.ts:89-97:

export function redirectBack(
  event: H3Event,
  opts: { fallback?: string; status?: number; allowQuery?: boolean } = {},
): HTTPResponse {
  const referer = event.req.headers.get("referer");
  let location = opts.fallback ?? "/";
  if (referer && URL.canParse(referer)) {
    const refererURL = new URL(referer);
    if (refererURL.origin === event.url.origin) {
      // BUG: pathname can be "//evil.com/path" which browsers interpret
      // as a protocol-relative URL
      location = refererURL.pathname + (opts.allowQuery ? refererURL.search : "");
    }
  }
  return redirect(location, opts.status);
}

The root cause is a discrepancy between how the WHATWG URL parser and browsers handle double-slash paths:

  1. new URL("http://target.com//evil.com/path").origin → "http://target.com" — origin check passes
  2. new URL("http://target.com//evil.com/path").pathname → "//evil.com/path" — extracted as redirect location
  3. Browser receives Location: //evil.com/path → interprets as protocol-relative URL → redirects to evil.com

Attack scenario: The attacker shares a link like http://target.com//evil.com/page. If the target application has catch-all routes (common in SPAs built with h3/Nitro), the app serves its page at that URL. When the user navigates to an endpoint calling redirectBack(), the browser sends Referer: http://target.com//evil.com/page. The origin check passes, and the user is redirected to evil.com, which can host a phishing page mimicking the target.

PoC

# 1. Create a minimal h3 app with redirectBack
cat > /tmp/h3-redirect-poc.ts << 'SCRIPT'
import { H3, redirectBack } from "h3";

const app = new H3();
app.post("/submit", (event) => redirectBack(event));

const res = await app.fetch(new Request("http://localhost/submit", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { referer: "http://localhost//evil.com/steal" }
}));

console.log("Status:", res.status);
console.log("Location:", res.headers.get("location"));
// Expected: a same-origin path
// Actual: "//evil.com/steal" — protocol-relative redirect to evil.com
SCRIPT

# 2. Verify URL parsing behavior
node -e "
const u = new URL('http://localhost//evil.com/steal');
console.log('origin:', u.origin);         // http://localhost
console.log('pathname:', u.pathname);     // //evil.com/steal
console.log('origin matches localhost:', u.origin === 'http://localhost');  // true
"
# Output:
# origin: http://localhost
# pathname: //evil.com/steal
# origin matches localhost: true

Impact

An attacker can redirect users from a trusted application to an attacker-controlled domain. This enables:

  • Credential phishing: Redirect to a lookalike login page to harvest credentials
  • OAuth token theft: In OAuth flows using redirectBack(), steal authorization codes by redirecting to an attacker's callback
  • Trust exploitation: Users see the initial link points to the trusted domain, lowering suspicion

The vulnerability requires no authentication and affects any endpoint using redirectBack().

Recommended Fix

Sanitize the extracted pathname to prevent protocol-relative URLs. In src/utils/response.ts, after extracting the pathname from the referer:

export function redirectBack(
  event: H3Event,
  opts: { fallback?: string; status?: number; allowQuery?: boolean } = {},
): HTTPResponse {
  const referer = event.req.headers.get("referer");
  let location = opts.fallback ?? "/";
  if (referer && URL.canParse(referer)) {
    const refererURL = new URL(referer);
    if (refererURL.origin === event.url.origin) {
      let pathname = refererURL.pathname;
      // Prevent protocol-relative open redirect (e.g., "//evil.com")
      if (pathname.startsWith("//")) {
        pathname = "/" + pathname.replace(/^\/+/, "");
      }
      location = pathname + (opts.allowQuery ? refererURL.search : "");
    }
  }
  return redirect(location, opts.status);
}

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
h3 1 listed versions No fix yet
h3
>= 2.0.1-rc.17, < 2.0.1-rc.18
2.0.1-rc.18

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

h3 npm → 2.0.1-rc.18

npm
npm install h3@2.0.1-rc.18
yarn
yarn add h3@2.0.1-rc.18
pnpm
pnpm add h3@2.0.1-rc.18

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 5.3

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Passive
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
Low
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Not defined
Scope
X

CVSS 3.1 5.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. Use a list of approved URLs or domains to be used for redirection.
  • Architecture and Design: Use an intermediate disclaimer page that provides the user with a clear warning that they are leaving the current site. Implement a long timeout before the redirect occurs, or force the user to click on the link. Be careful to avoid XSS problems (CWE-79) when generating the disclaimer page.
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "/login.asp" and ID 2 could map to "http://www.example.com/". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-45] provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that no externally-supplied requests are honored by requiring that all redirect requests include a unique nonce generated by the application [REF-483]. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330).
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls. Many open redirect problems occur because the programmer assumed that certain inputs could not be modified, such as cookies and hidden form fields.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-q5pr-72pq-83v3
H3: Unbounded Chunked Cookie Count in Session Cleanup Loop may Lead to Denial of Service
High Also affects h3
GHSA-4hxc-9384-m385
h3: SSE Event Injection via Unsanitized Carriage Return (`\r`) in EventStream Data and Comment Fields (Bypass of CVE Fix)
Medium Also affects h3
GHSA-2j6q-whv2-gh6w
h3: Missing Path Segment Boundary Check in `mount()` Causes Middleware Execution on Unrelated Prefix-Matching Routes
Medium Also affects h3
GHSA-72gr-qfp7-vwhw
h3: Double Decoding in `serveStatic` Bypasses `resolveDotSegments` Path Traversal Protection via `%252e%252e`
High Also affects h3
GHSA-wr4h-v87w-p3r7
h3 has a Path Traversal via Percent-Encoded Dot Segments in serveStatic Allows Arbitrary File Read
High Also affects h3
GHSA-3vj8-jmxq-cgj5
h3 has a middleware bypass with one gadget
Critical Also affects h3
GHSA-26f5-8h2x-34xh
h3 has an observable timing discrepancy in basic auth utils
Medium Also affects h3
GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm
h3 has a Server-Sent Events Injection via Unsanitized Newlines in Event Stream Fields
Critical Also affects h3

Credits: offset

Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor