GHSA-fjf4-6f34-w64q CVE-2026-2733
Keycloak: Missing Check on Disabled Client for Docker Registry Protocol
- Severity
- 3.8 / 10
- Low · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.37%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 31.10% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-285 Improper Authorization
- Fix
- None yet
- No fixed version published
Description
A flaw was identified in the Docker v2 authentication endpoint of Keycloak, where tokens continue to be issued even after a Docker registry client has been administratively disabled. This means that turning the client “Enabled” setting to OFF does not fully prevent access. As a result, previously valid credentials can still be used to obtain authentication tokens. This weakens administrative controls and could allow unintended access to container registry resources.
Affected versions
Maven
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| org.keycloak:keycloak-services | <= 26.5.3 |
No fix yet |
How to fix
No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 3.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-285: Improper Authorization
The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-v3f7-2p4r-mwfw Keycloak vulnerable to cross-site scripting (xss) via case-insensitive uri validation bypass | High | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-9jrw-8xf7-xqhq Keycloak vulnerable to information disclosure through arbitrary filesystem path probing | Medium | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-w3p3-7cjg-vgfw Keycloak allows unauthorized access to resources via uma permission ticket bypass | Medium | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-f5p5-6xmx-p252 Keycloak vulnerable to authorization bypass via incorrect uri comparison | High | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-r7rc-c989-86g6 Keycloak: Attacker can re-enable and take over disabled clients via registration access token | Medium | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-4gv3-mc9p-5wqc Keycloak: Unauthenticated account takeover via reset-credentials flow bypass | Critical | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-6g26-7cx5-mrrg Keycloak: Information disclosure due to user profile permission bypass | Low | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-cpf7-j4cf-vqx4 Keycloak has an Out-of-bounds Read | Medium | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor