Skip to content

GHSA-f74w-272x-mqcv CVE-2026-46550

NocoDB: Refresh Token Cookie Set Without `secure` and `sameSite` Flags

Medium npm
Severity
5.4 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.16%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 5.05% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-614 Sensitive Cookie in HTTPS Session Without 'Secure' Attribute
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

The refresh-token cookie was set with httpOnly: true but missing both the secure flag and the sameSite attribute. Over plain HTTP the cookie could be intercepted on the network; without sameSite, browsers attached it to cross-site POSTs, enabling CSRF against the token-refresh endpoint.

Details

In packages/nocodb/src/services/users/helpers.ts, setTokenCookie produced the cookie with only httpOnly, an expires date, and an optional domain from NC_BASE_HOST_NAME — no secure, no sameSite. The refresh endpoint POST /api/v2/auth/token/refresh (auth.controller.ts) read the cookie unconditionally and returned a new JWT, with no CSRF token.

The fix sets httpOnly: true, sameSite: 'lax', and conditional secure: req.ncSiteUrl.startsWith('https') so the flag is active under HTTPS while still functional on plain-HTTP localhost development.

This is distinct from GHSA-x4vh-j75g-268g (refresh-token lifecycle on password reset) — different root cause, different attack vector.

Impact

  • Cookie interception on plain HTTP networks (no secure).
  • Cross-site refresh: malicious cross-origin pages could trigger token refresh and, combined with any same-origin XSS or open-redirect on the NocoDB domain, capture the new JWT.
  • Refresh tokens have multi-day expiry (NC_REFRESH_TOKEN_EXP_IN_DAYS), so the exposure window is long.

Credit

This issue was reported by @ik0z.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
nocodb
<= 0.301.3
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-614: Sensitive Cookie in HTTPS Session Without 'Secure' Attribute

The Secure attribute for sensitive cookies in HTTPS sessions is not set.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Always set the secure attribute when the cookie should be sent via HTTPS only.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-hmcr-rmjq-47qr
NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Spreadsheet Import Endpoint
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4
NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Base Migration URL
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-6mhr-74x2-98v9
NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Secure Attachment
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-r989-7g3j-wjhw
NocoDB: Refresh Tokens Persist Through Password Recovery
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-gprh-27j3-g5h4
NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Spreadsheet Fetch URL
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-g72g-r7m4-9x4g
NocoDB: OAuth Tokens Persist Through Security Events
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q
NocoDB: Missing Ownership Check in MCP Attachment Read
Low Also affects nocodb
GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg
NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Form View Redirect URL
High Also affects nocodb
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor