GHSA-f6pj-qv47-g96w CVE-2026-77247 PYSEC-2026-4092
MCP Atlassian: Arbitrary server-local file upload to Jira/Confluence attachments via unrestricted file_path parameters
- Severity
- 8.3 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.39%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 32.92% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-73 External Control of File Name or Path
- Fix
0.22.0- Upgrade mcp-atlassian to this version or later
Description
Summary
The Jira and Confluence attachment upload tools accept caller-controlled file path parameters and read those paths from the MCP server's local filesystem before uploading the file as an Atlassian attachment.
In local stdio deployments, this can expose files readable by the user's MCP process. In documented HTTP/SSE or streamable-http deployments, the impact is higher: any MCP client that is allowed to invoke write/upload tools can cause the server process to read a server-local file and upload it to Jira or Confluence.
This is not dependent on an AI prompt injection or model behavior. It can be triggered deterministically with a normal MCP tool call.
Details
The vulnerable behavior exists because upload tool arguments are treated as server-local filesystem paths.
Relevant implementation points:
-
mcp_atlassian.confluence.attachments.AttachmentsMixin.upload_attachment- Accepts
file_path. - Converts the supplied value to an absolute path when needed.
- Checks existence with
os.path.exists. - Passes the path into the attachment upload flow.
- Accepts
-
mcp_atlassian.confluence.attachments.AttachmentsMixin._upload_attachment_direct- Opens the supplied
file_pathwithopen(file_path, "rb"). - Sends the resulting file object as multipart form data to Confluence.
- Opens the supplied
-
mcp_atlassian.confluence.attachments.AttachmentsMixin.upload_attachments- Iterates caller-supplied
file_paths. - Calls
upload_attachmentfor each path.
- Iterates caller-supplied
-
mcp_atlassian.jira.attachments.AttachmentsMixin.upload_attachment- Accepts
file_path. - Converts the supplied value to an absolute path when needed.
- Checks existence with
os.path.exists. - Opens the file and uploads it as a Jira attachment.
- Accepts
-
mcp_atlassian.jira.attachments.AttachmentsMixin.upload_attachments- Iterates caller-supplied
file_paths. - Calls
upload_attachmentfor each path.
- Iterates caller-supplied
-
mcp_atlassian.servers.jira.update_issue- Accepts an
attachmentsargument as a JSON array string or comma-separated string. - Converts it into attachment paths and passes them into the Jira update flow.
- Accepts an
The project also documents non-stdio deployment modes:
ssestreamable-http- multi-user authentication
- Docker and Kubernetes deployment
Therefore the upload path arguments should not be treated as if they always come from a single fully trusted local desktop user. In an HTTP or multi-user deployment, the caller and the server-local filesystem are separate security boundaries.
The core issue is that the MCP caller can choose a path, while the MCP server reads that path using the server process privileges and sends the bytes to a remote Jira or Confluence attachment endpoint.
Expected behavior:
- Server-local file uploads should be denied by default in HTTP/SSE or multi-user deployments, or
- Uploads should be constrained to an explicit allowlisted upload directory after realpath resolution, and
- Dangerous path forms such as remote UNC paths and
file://URLs should be rejected before filesystem checks.
PoC
The following proof of concept uses a benign temporary file generated at runtime. It does not rely on prompt injection or any AI/LLM behavior. It uses a normal MCP client call against a test Confluence page controlled by the tester.
Prerequisites:
- A test Confluence site.
- A test page content ID where the tester is allowed to upload attachments.
- A test Confluence API token or another supported authentication method.
- Python 3.10 or newer.
Start mcp-atlassian in HTTP mode:
docker run --rm -p 9000:9000 \
-e CONFLUENCE_URL="https://<your-test-site>.atlassian.net/wiki" \
-e CONFLUENCE_USERNAME="<tester-email>" \
-e CONFLUENCE_API_TOKEN="<tester-api-token>" \
ghcr.io/sooperset/mcp-atlassian:latest \
--transport streamable-http --host 0.0.0.0 --port 9000
Install the MCP Python client:
python -m pip install "mcp>=1.8.0"
Run this standalone client script:
import asyncio
import os
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path
from mcp import ClientSession
from mcp.client.streamable_http import streamablehttp_client
async def main() -> None:
mcp_url = os.environ.get("MCP_URL", "http://127.0.0.1:9000/mcp")
content_id = os.environ["CONFLUENCE_CONTENT_ID"]
proof_dir = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="mcp-atlassian-proof-"))
proof_file = proof_dir / "server-local-proof.txt"
proof_file.write_text(
"This benign file was read from the MCP server filesystem and uploaded by an MCP tool call.\n",
encoding="utf-8",
)
async with streamablehttp_client(mcp_url) as (read_stream, write_stream, _):
async with ClientSession(read_stream, write_stream) as session:
await session.initialize()
result = await session.call_tool(
"confluence_upload_attachments",
{
"content_id": content_id,
"file_paths": str(proof_file),
"comment": "Security test: benign server-local upload proof",
"minor_edit": True,
},
)
print(result)
print(f"Uploaded test filename: {proof_file.name}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Run it with the test page ID:
CONFLUENCE_CONTENT_ID="<test-page-content-id>" python poc.py
Observed result:
- The MCP client sends a normal
confluence_upload_attachmentstool call. - The MCP server reads the temporary file from its own filesystem.
- The MCP server uploads that file as an attachment to the configured Confluence page.
- The uploaded attachment appears on the test page.
Security significance:
- The MCP caller did not need shell access to the server.
- The MCP caller did not need direct filesystem access to the server.
- The MCP caller only needed permission to invoke the upload tool.
- The file read happened with the privileges of the MCP server process.
The same class of issue applies to Jira attachment upload flows that accept caller-controlled file path parameters.
Impact
This is a server-local file disclosure and exfiltration primitive through attachment upload tools.
Impacted users:
- Users running
mcp-atlassianwith write/upload tools enabled. - Operators exposing
mcp-atlassianthroughsseorstreamable-http. - Multi-user deployments where MCP callers are not fully trusted with arbitrary read access to the MCP server filesystem.
- Docker or Kubernetes deployments where the MCP process can read environment files, mounted secrets, service account tokens, application configuration, or shared volumes.
Potential attacker:
- A malicious or compromised MCP client with permission to invoke attachment upload tools.
- A malicious user in a multi-user MCP deployment.
- An attacker who can supply or influence MCP tool arguments through an integrated workflow.
Potentially exposed data depends on the deployment, but can include files readable by the MCP server process, such as:
- application configuration
- deployment secrets
- cloud or service credentials mounted into the runtime
- CI/CD or automation tokens
- other files available to the MCP server user
This issue does not require prior compromise of the internal network in deployments where the MCP service is intentionally exposed over HTTP/SSE to multiple users or external MCP clients. The attacker only needs the ability to invoke the upload tool. The server then reads the chosen path with its own process privileges and uploads it to Jira or Confluence.
If the intended security model is that every MCP caller is fully trusted with arbitrary read access to the server filesystem, that should be documented explicitly. Otherwise, server-local file path uploads should be opt-in and constrained to a configured upload root.
Suggested fixes:
- Default-deny server-local path uploads in HTTP/SSE and multi-user deployments.
- Add an explicit opt-in flag for server-local upload paths.
- Require an allowlisted upload root and enforce it after realpath resolution.
- Reject
file://URLs and remote UNC path forms before any filesystem operation. - Prefer client-provided file/resource blobs over server-local path strings for remote MCP deployments.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| mcp-atlassian | < 0.22.0 |
0.22.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
mcp-atlassian PyPI → 0.22.0
- pip
pip install --upgrade "mcp-atlassian>=0.22.0"- poetry
poetry add "mcp-atlassian>=0.22.0"- uv
uv add "mcp-atlassian>=0.22.0"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 8.3
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- High
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
CVSS 3.1 6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path
The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: When the set of filenames is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap provide this capability.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict all access to files within a particular directory. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
- Implementation: Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59).
- Installation, Operation: Use OS-level permissions and run as a low-privileged user to limit the scope of any successful attack.
- Operation, Implementation: If you are using PHP, configure your application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop your application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
- Testing: Use tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session. These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-g2r2-3j32-j27x MCP Atlassian: Reflected XSS in OAuth Setup Callback Handler | Medium | Also affects mcp-atlassian |
| GHSA-h7wj-5v37-59r2 MCP Atlassian: Path traversal in upload_attachment allows arbitrary file read (incomplete fix for CVE-2026-27825) | Medium | Also affects mcp-atlassian |
| GHSA-4596-2p6p-28cv MCP Atlassian: Insecure File Permissions on OAuth Token Storage | Medium | Also affects mcp-atlassian |
| GHSA-mfv2-4wvm-9pgp MCP Atlassian: Path traversal in upload_attachment allows arbitrary file read and exfiltration via MCP tool call | Medium | Also affects mcp-atlassian |
| GHSA-p6hp-93wp-fh6p MCP Atlassian: Path Traversal / Arbitrary File Read in confluence_upload_attachment MCP tool (incomplete fix of GHSA-xjgw-4wvw-rgm4) | High | Also affects mcp-atlassian |
| GHSA-6cr4-ccf3-x7h4 MCP Atlassian: Arbitrary file read via confluence_upload_attachment allows exfiltration of server credentials | High | Also affects mcp-atlassian |
| GHSA-mrq8-fv7v-hhjg MCP Atlassian: HTTP upload tools accept arbitrary server-local file paths | Medium | Also affects mcp-atlassian |
| GHSA-2xj6-xx86-cwwc MCP Atlassian: Arbitrary File Read & Exfiltration (Confused Deputy) in JIRA update_issue | High | Also affects mcp-atlassian |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor