GHSA-cmhj-wh2f-9cgx CVE-2026-56676
9router: Image prefetch DNS rebinding allows SSRF to internal services
- Severity
- 7.4 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.19%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 8.64% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-367 Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition
- CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
- Fix
0.5.2- Upgrade 9router to this version or later
Description
Summary
9router validates image URLs by resolving the host before fetching, but the later server-side fetch performs a separate DNS resolution. An attacker-controlled DNS name can resolve to a public IP during validation and then rebind to an internal Docker/private IP during the fetch. This allows the server-side image prefetch to reach internal-only HTTP services (SSRF).
Details
- Affected version / commit: 9router
v0.4.80@b282f05. - Reachable through
/v1/chat/completionswith a vision-capable model and animage_urlcontent part. A vision-capable model name is required so the image survives modality stripping and the server-side prefetch is armed. - The provider used in this reproduction is the bundled mock provider — no real API key and no real provider call.
- internal-admin (the SSRF target) is not exposed to the host network; it is reachable only from inside the Docker network.
- rebind-dns behaviour for
rebind.9r.test:- first A response →
1.1.1.1(public) to pass the public-host guard, - second A response →
172.29.0.10(internal-admin) during the fetch.
- first A response →
- internal-admin logs
GET /ssrf-markerwithpeer=172.29.0.30(theproxied-routercontainer), proving the server-side fetch landed on the internal service. - mock-provider receives
POST /api/chatand the flow completes withHTTP 200. - Root cause: DNS TOCTOU — the IP is not pinned between the validation resolution (the public-host guard) and the fetch resolution. The guard and the fetch each resolve the hostname independently, so a TTL-0 rebinding authority can return a public IP to the guard and an internal IP to the fetch.
Proof of Concept
This repository is a self-contained Docker Compose reproduction. No real provider is called and no real API key is required.
- Build and start the stack:
docker compose up --build - Confirm
internal-adminis unreachable from the host:curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18083/ssrf-marker # connection refused / fail docker compose ps # internal-admin has NO host port mapping - Send the request named
POST image-prefetch DNS rebinding triggerfromrequests.http, or with curl:curl -i -X POST http://127.0.0.1:18082/v1/chat/completions \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "model": "ollama-local/gemma3", "messages": [{"role":"user","content":[ {"type":"text","text":"reproduction image-prefetch trigger"}, {"type":"image_url","image_url":{"url":"http://rebind.9r.test:8080/ssrf-marker?case=rebind-trigger"}} ]}], "stream": false }'
Impact
- SSRF to internal HTTP services reachable from the 9router host/container.
- Depending on the environment, this can reach cloud metadata endpoints, internal admin panels, or be used for internal service discovery.
- Blind / semi-blind SSRF when the fetched response is not returned to the attacker; an exfil variant (pointing the image at an internal endpoint that returns valid image bytes) can return internal content base64-encoded to the upstream.
- Requires a code path that prefetches/normalizes remote images for vision-capable providers.
- No real credential is needed for the reproduction.
Suggested Fix
- Pin the resolved IP after validation and connect to that IP (resolve once, then reuse the address for the fetch).
- Block private, loopback, link-local, multicast, and cloud-metadata ranges at connect time, not only at validation time.
- Perform DNS resolution and IP checks immediately before the request and against the address actually used to connect.
- Disable redirects, or re-validate every redirect target with the same checks.
- Enforce an allowlist for image-fetch domains where feasible.
- Add a timeout, a response size limit, and a content-type check.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| 9router | < 0.5.2 |
0.5.2 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
9router npm → 0.5.2
- npm
npm install 9router@0.5.2- yarn
yarn add 9router@0.5.2- pnpm
pnpm add 9router@0.5.2
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.4
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition
The product checks the state of a resource before using that resource, but the resource's state can change between the check and the use in a way that invalidates the results of the check.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: The most basic advice for TOCTOU vulnerabilities is to not perform a check before the use. This does not resolve the underlying issue of the execution of a function on a resource whose state and identity cannot be assured, but it does help to limit the false sense of security given by the check.
- Implementation: When the file being altered is owned by the current user and group, set the effective gid and uid to that of the current user and group when executing this statement.
- Architecture and Design: Limit the interleaving of operations on files from multiple processes.
- Implementation, Architecture and Design: If you cannot perform operations atomically and you must share access to the resource between multiple processes or threads, then try to limit the amount of time (CPU cycles) between the check and use of the resource. This will not fix the problem, but it could make it more difficult for an attack to succeed.
- Implementation: Recheck the resource after the use call to verify that the action was taken appropriately.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that some environmental locking mechanism can be used to protect resources effectively.
- Implementation: Ensure that locking occurs before the check, as opposed to afterwards, such that the resource, as checked, is the same as it is when in use.
CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-32gc-64m7-hj7v 9Router has a Login Brute-Force Lockout Bypass via Spoofable X-9r-Real-Ip Header | Medium | Also affects 9router |
| GHSA-5mj8-gf6m-fhw8 9Router has an Authentication Bypass in Public LLM API via Spoofable X-9r-Real-Ip Header | High | Also affects 9router |
| GHSA-8g4w-4ffg-8vgx 9Router: Authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via OIDC Provider Test Endpoint | High | Also affects 9router |
| GHSA-vmjq-hvgq-2wv4 9router: Mass assignment in PATCH /api/settings allows authenticated authorization downgrade | High | Also affects 9router |
| GHSA-6mwv-4mrm-5p3m 9router: Kiro region injection allows authenticated SSRF with Authorization header forwarding | Medium | Also affects 9router |
| GHSA-x5c9-v98j-722r 9router /v1 APIs has unauthenticated access via reverse proxy locality collapse | High | Also affects 9router |
| GHSA-86m2-fcxq-5q7c 9router: Unauthenticated `/v1` proxy access via `Host`-header spoofing → open AI relay + SSRF | High | Also affects 9router |
| GHSA-8gmq-j984-vp4r 9router: Unauthenticated LLM proxy access via /codex rewrite authorization bypass | High | Also affects 9router |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor