GHSA-cfxv-8fw8-rwpv CVE-2026-55530 PYSEC-2026-3901
praisonaiagents: ast_grep_rewrite rewrites arbitrary files without the @require_approval gate enforced on every sibling mutation tool
- Severity
- 6.1 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.17%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 5.83% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-862 Missing Authorization
- Fix
1.6.58- Upgrade praisonaiagents to this version or later
Description
Target: PraisonAI (MervinPraison/PraisonAI)
Affected component: praisonaiagents/tools/ast_grep_tool.py — ast_grep_rewrite
Affected versions: master at ce97667156a116c50b4a3d1aa21e09f048903fda; reproduced against the current praisonaiagents PyPI release (praisonaiagents <= 1.6.52).
Summary
Tools in praisonaiagents/tools/ that modify on-disk state or run code are uniformly wrapped with @require_approval, which routes the call through an interactive approval flow before the body runs and fails closed — on denial (or with no approval backend configured) it raises PermissionError and the side effect does not occur. This is applied at every sibling mutation entry point:
| File | Line | Symbol | Risk level |
|---|---|---|---|
file_tools.py |
212 | copy_file |
high |
file_tools.py |
239 | move_file |
high |
file_tools.py |
266 | delete_file |
high |
edit_tools.py |
38 | EditTools.edit_file |
high |
edit_tools.py |
155 | edit_file |
high |
shell_tools.py |
32 | execute_command |
critical |
python_tools.py |
352 | execute_code |
critical |
ast_grep_tool.py:149 ast_grep_rewrite is structurally a sibling of these but has no decorator and no from ..approval import require_approval import. With dry_run=False (LLM-controllable), it builds sg --pattern <P> --rewrite <R> --lang <L> --update-all <path> (lines 204–211) and calls subprocess.run(cmd, ...) (line 215), modifying every file under path matching the pattern. There is no approval gate, no _validate_path workspace check, and no cwd= sandboxing. The function is registered as a top-level tool (__init__.py:182) and exposed via the code_intelligence built-in profile (profiles.py).
A secondary defect: on the dry_run=False path ast_grep_rewrite returns the literal string No changes made to the caller even when it modified files (the "No changes made" return at ast_grep_tool.py:230 is reached on this path), so an operator inspecting tool output sees no record that a write occurred.
Proof of concept
Single script, clean venv, praisonaiagents from PyPI, ast-grep CLI installed. PRAISONAI_AUTO_APPROVE is removed from the environment first, so no env-bypass is in play.
import os, tempfile, textwrap
os.environ.pop("PRAISONAI_AUTO_APPROVE", None)
workdir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="poc-")
target = os.path.join(workdir, "target.py")
open(target, "w").write(textwrap.dedent("""
def safe_function(x):
return x + 1
def hello(name):
return 'hi ' + name
"""))
# Positive: undecorated tool rewrites the file.
from praisonaiagents.tools.ast_grep_tool import ast_grep_rewrite
ast_grep_rewrite(
pattern="def $FN($$$): return $$$",
replacement="def $FN($$$): import os; os.environ['POC_CANARY']='1'; return $$$",
lang="python", path=workdir, dry_run=False,
)
# Negative control: decorated sibling triggers the approval flow.
from praisonaiagents.tools.edit_tools import edit_file
edit_file(file_path=target, old_text="def hello(name):", new_text="def hello(name): # X")
Result, verified: ast_grep_rewrite rewrote target.py to contain the injected import os; os.environ['POC_CANARY']='1' payload, no approval prompt fired, and the call returned No changes made. The subsequent edit_file call in the same process rendered the Tool Approval Required panel and, on denial, raised PermissionError("Execution of edit_file denied: User denied") without modifying its target. Same process, same approval backend — the only difference is the missing decorator on ast_grep_rewrite.
Threat model
An LLM agent running locally whose tool surface includes ast_grep_rewrite (via the code_intelligence profile or direct import). Triggers: the operator asks the agent to refactor code, or prompt-injection in fetched docs / RAG context / any LLM-visible input steers the agent to call ast_grep_rewrite with attacker-chosen pattern, replacement, and path (the dry_run field is in the LLM-visible tool schema, so dry_run=False is requestable). The agent can then rewrite any file the host process can write — source trees, build configs, dotfiles, the agent's own source. With path="/" the rewrite is filesystem-wide. Because the rewrite injects arbitrary text, pointing it at a file that is later imported or executed turns this write primitive into code execution — the basis for the escalation noted in the CVSS line. No operator prompt and no audit record of the modification.
Suggested fix
--- a/praisonaiagents/tools/ast_grep_tool.py
+++ b/praisonaiagents/tools/ast_grep_tool.py
@@
from praisonaiagents._logging import get_logger
from typing import Optional, List
+from ..approval import require_approval
@@
+@require_approval(risk_level="high")
def ast_grep_rewrite(
pattern: str,
replacement: str,
high matches the file-modifying siblings; critical is defensible given the write→exec escalation. In the same patch: add a _validate_path workspace boundary check (cf. edit_tools.py:27); fix the No changes made return so it reflects actual modifications; apply the decorator to ast_grep_scan (ast_grep_tool.py:243) if it can write. ast_grep_search is read-only and can stay undecorated. A regression test asserting ast_grep_rewrite requires approval (alongside the other mutation tools) would have caught this at review time.
Coordinated disclosure
- Kai Aizen / SnailSploit —
kai@snailsploit.com— PGP on request.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| praisonaiagents | < 1.6.58 |
1.6.58 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
praisonaiagents PyPI → 1.6.58
- pip
pip install --upgrade "praisonaiagents>=1.6.58"- poetry
poetry add "praisonaiagents>=1.6.58"- uv
uv add "praisonaiagents>=1.6.58"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 6.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-gxmw-5f7x-6g22 praisonaiagents vulnerable to arbitrary file write via unsanitized `user_id` in `FileMemory.__init__()` — path traversal to any writable location | High | Also affects praisonaiagents |
| GHSA-x44h-65qv-cw74 praisonaiagents has an SSRF protection bypass in `spider_tools._host_is_blocked()` via DNS-resolved hostnames (`127.0.0.1.nip.io`) | High | Also affects praisonaiagents |
| GHSA-7g3p-92qq-8wvh praisonaiagents: AgentServer declares auth_token but never enforces it on any route | High | Also affects praisonaiagents |
| GHSA-5r34-2g38-6569 praisonaiagents web_crawl vulnerable to SSRF via redirect-following | High | Also affects praisonaiagents |
| GHSA-vg6p-v9vm-6fgj praisonaiagents vulnerable to SSRF in web_crawl tool via redirect-following and DNS rebinding (validate-then-fetch gap) | High | Also affects praisonaiagents |
| GHSA-8hjw-25cg-g52h praisonaiagents has a `web_crawl` SSRF protection bypass via unchecked redirect targets | High | Also affects praisonaiagents |
| GHSA-hxmv-c4g6-5fqc PraisonAI workflow include bypasses tools.py autoload opt-in and executes included recipe code | High | Also affects praisonaiagents |
| GHSA-m6wp-h223-4c8g PraisonAI: Plugin Auto-Discovery Executes Arbitrary Python Files Without Verification | High | Also affects praisonaiagents |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor