Skip to content

GHSA-c8x3-rg72-fwwg CVE-2021-37218 GO-2022-0591

Privilege escalation in Hashicorp Nomad

High Go
Severity
8.8 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.67%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 52.01% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
Fix
1.0.10
Upgrade github.com/hashicorp/nomad to this version or later

Description

HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise Raft RPC layer allows non-server agents with a valid certificate signed by the same CA to access server-only functionality, enabling privilege escalation. Fixed in 1.0.10 and 1.1.4.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/hashicorp/nomad
< 1.0.10
1.0.10
github.com/hashicorp/nomad
>= 1.1.0, < 1.1.4
1.1.4
github.com/hashicorp/nomad
< 1.0.10
>= 1.1.0, < 1.1.4
1.0.10
1.1.4

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/hashicorp/nomad Go → 1.0.10

go
go get github.com/hashicorp/nomad@v1.0.10 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation

The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
  • Implementation: If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-hx53-77qj-8663
HashiCorp Nomad vulnerable to a path traversal
High Also affects github.com/hashicorp/nomad
GHSA-3934-423w-4jq3
HashiCorp Nomad vulnerable to symlink attack
Medium Also affects github.com/hashicorp/nomad
GHSA-rx97-6c62-55mf
Hashicorp Nomad Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability
High Also affects github.com/hashicorp/nomad
GHSA-c3q9-q986-vrwh
Nomad is vulnerable to unintentional exposure of the workload identity token and client secret token in audit logs
Medium Also affects github.com/hashicorp/nomad
GHSA-hr68-hvgv-xxqf
Hashicorp Nomad Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability
Medium Also affects github.com/hashicorp/nomad
GHSA-2w5v-x29g-jw7j
Hashicorp Nomad Incorrect Authorization vulnerability
High Also affects github.com/hashicorp/nomad
GHSA-25qx-vfw2-fw8r
Nomad Vulnerable to Allocation Directory Escape On Non-Existing File Paths Through Archive Unpacking
Medium Also affects github.com/hashicorp/nomad
GHSA-5mqx-rpxv-mvxj
HashiCorp Nomad is vulnerable to path escape through archive unpacking during migration
High Also affects github.com/hashicorp/nomad
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor