GHSA-9wgh-m22w-9xj8 CVE-2026-47279
NocoDB: Hidden LTAR Column Exposure in Public Shared-View Relation Endpoints
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.41%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 34.83% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-284 Improper Access Control
- Fix
2026.05.1- Upgrade nocodb to this version or later
Description
Summary
The public shared-view relation endpoints accepted a caller-supplied column ID without verifying that the column was visible in the shared view, so anyone holding a share UUID could read links from any LTAR column on the view's table — including columns the view owner had hidden.
Details
publicMmList, publicHmList, and relDataList already ensured that the
requested column belonged to the view's model, but did not check the
view-column entry's show flag. All three handlers now also fetch the
shared view's column entries and reject the request unless the matching
entry has show=true. The four public relation routes covered by the fix
are:
GET /api/v2/public/shared-view/:uuid/rows/:rowId/mm/:columnId(many-to-many)GET /api/v2/public/shared-view/:uuid/rows/:rowId/hm/:columnId(has-many)GET /api/v2/public/shared-view/:uuid/rows/:rowId/{ln,om}/:columnId(links / one-to-many — both share the many-to-many handler)GET /api/v2/public/shared-view/:uuid/nested/:columnId(form/gallery picker)
Impact
Anyone holding a share UUID could enumerate the full set of linked records
for any hidden LTAR column on the view's table by calling the relation
endpoint directly, even when the same column was correctly omitted from the
public /rows response.
Credit
This issue was reported by @leduckhuong.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| nocodb | < 2026.05.1 |
2026.05.1 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
nocodb npm → 2026.05.1
- npm
npm install nocodb@2026.05.1- yarn
yarn add nocodb@2026.05.1- pnpm
pnpm add nocodb@2026.05.1
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
Weakness
CWE-284: Improper Access Control
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-hmcr-rmjq-47qr NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Spreadsheet Import Endpoint | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4 NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Base Migration URL | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-6mhr-74x2-98v9 NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Secure Attachment | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-r989-7g3j-wjhw NocoDB: Refresh Tokens Persist Through Password Recovery | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-gprh-27j3-g5h4 NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Spreadsheet Fetch URL | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-g72g-r7m4-9x4g NocoDB: OAuth Tokens Persist Through Security Events | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q NocoDB: Missing Ownership Check in MCP Attachment Read | Low | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Form View Redirect URL | High | Also affects nocodb |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor