GHSA-9rpj-v7hf-vv2w CVE-2026-54021 PYSEC-2026-2718
Open WebUI: Authenticated users can target arbitrary configured Ollama backends via unguarded url_idx path parameter
- Severity
- 6.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.28%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 20.86% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
- Fix
0.9.6- Upgrade open-webui to this version or later
Description
Summary
Several direct, index-addressed Ollama proxy routes accept a caller-supplied url_idx
path parameter and use it as a raw index into the admin-configured OLLAMA_BASE_URLS
list. Access control on these routes validates only whether the user may use the
requested model, never which backend the request is routed to. Any authenticated
user can append an arbitrary url_idx to force their request onto an Ollama backend
they were never authorized to reach, including internal, higher-privilege, or
explicitly admin-disabled backends.
Affected endpoints
All indexed Ollama routes that resolve the backend through get_ollama_url():
POST /ollama/api/chat/{url_idx}
POST /ollama/api/generate/{url_idx}
POST /ollama/api/embed/{url_idx}
POST /ollama/api/embeddings/{url_idx}
POST /ollama/v1/chat/completions/{url_idx}
POST /ollama/v1/completions/{url_idx}
POST /ollama/v1/messages/{url_idx}
POST /ollama/v1/responses/{url_idx}
Root cause
backend/open_webui/routers/ollama.py — get_ollama_url() consults the
model-to-backend allow-list (OLLAMA_MODELS[model]["urls"]) only when url_idx is
omitted. When the caller supplies url_idx, that mapping is skipped and the value is
used directly as an index:
async def get_ollama_url(request: Request, model: str, url_idx: Optional[int] = None):
if url_idx is None:
models = request.app.state.OLLAMA_MODELS
if model not in models:
raise HTTPException(...)
url_idx = random.choice(models[model].get("urls", []))
url = request.app.state.config.OLLAMA_BASE_URLS[url_idx] # caller-controlled, no authz
return url, url_idx
The outbound request is then sent to that backend using the backend's own configured
API key. Backends an admin has disabled (OLLAMA_API_CONFIGS["<idx>"].enable = false)
are hidden from model discovery but remain reachable through the indexed route, because
the disabled state is never re-checked at request time.
Impact
A verified, non-admin user with read access to any single model can:
- route requests to internal / higher-capability / restricted Ollama backends in multi-backend deployments, bypassing backend-level isolation;
- reach backends the admin has explicitly disabled;
- have those requests authenticated with the target backend's configured API key (the key is used server-side; it is not returned to the attacker);
- consume the restricted backend's compute.
There is no cross-user data disclosure and no exfiltration of the backend credential itself; the impact is unauthorized access to, and use of, restricted backend resources.
Affected / Patched
- Affected:
<= 0.9.5 - Patched:
>= 0.9.6
Fix
0.9.6 adds validate_ollama_backend_idx(), invoked on every indexed route (directly and
via get_ollama_url()), which returns 403 for any non-admin caller-supplied url_idx
that is not in the requested model's allowed urls. Because disabled backends are absent
from every model's urls, the same check also blocks routing to disabled backends.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| open-webui | < 0.9.6 |
0.9.6 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
open-webui PyPI → 0.9.6
- pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webui>=0.9.6"- poetry
poetry add "open-webui>=0.9.6"- uv
uv add "open-webui>=0.9.6"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 6.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-wvm9-9g5j-623f Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth role policy can still sign in via token exchange | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-4qg5-cxx4-g927 Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth domain allowlist or role policy can still sign in via token exchange | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-jqhh-cjmq-vmv6 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via a cyclic chat message history | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-34r3-9m95-vq73 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can reach the Azure platform channel via server-side web fetch | High | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-2724-6cpj-gf3v Open WebUI: Non-admin users can delete admin-owned external knowledge connections via knowledge base deletion | High | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-3pf7-q2g3-wj28 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can inject chats into another user's folder via chat completions | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor