GHSA-9rcw-c2f9-2j55 CVE-2025-54070
OpenZeppelin Contracts Bytes's lastIndexOf function with position argument performs out-of-bound memory access on empty buffers
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.40%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 34.17% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read
- Fix
- Available
- 2 packages have a fixed version
Description
Impact
The lastIndexOf(bytes,byte,uint256) function of the Bytes.sol library may access uninitialized memory when the following two conditions hold: 1) the provided buffer length is empty (i.e. buffer.length == 0) and position is not 2**256 - 1 (i.e. pos != type(uint256).max).
The pos argument could be used to access arbitrary data outside of the buffer bounds. This could lead to the operation running out of gas, or returning an invalid index (outside of the empty buffer). Processing this invalid result for accessing the buffer would cause a revert under normal conditions.
When triggered, the function reads memory at offset buffer + 0x20 + pos. If memory at that location (outside the buffer) matches the search pattern, the function would return an out of bound index instead of the expected type(uint256).max. This creates unexpected behavior where callers receive a valid-looking index pointing outside buffer bounds.
Subsequent memory accesses that don't check bounds and use the returned index must carefully review the potential impact depending on their setup. Code relying on this function returning type(uint256).max for empty buffers or using the returned index without bounds checking could exhibit undefined behavior.
Patches
Upgrade to 5.4.0
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| @openzeppelin/contracts | >= 5.2.0, < 5.4.0 |
5.4.0 |
| @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable | >= 5.2.0, < 5.4.0 |
5.4.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
@openzeppelin/contracts npm → 5.4.0
- npm
npm install @openzeppelin/contracts@5.4.0- yarn
yarn add @openzeppelin/contracts@5.4.0- pnpm
pnpm add @openzeppelin/contracts@5.4.0
@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable npm → 5.4.0
- npm
npm install @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable@5.4.0- yarn
yarn add @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable@5.4.0- pnpm
pnpm add @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable@5.4.0
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 0.0
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.
- Architecture and Design: Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-9vx6-7xxf-x967 OpenZeppelin Contracts base64 encoding may read from potentially dirty memory | High | Also affects @openzeppelin/contracts |
| GHSA-699g-q6qh-q4v8 OpenZeppelin Contracts and Contracts Upgradeable duplicated execution of subcalls in v4.9.4 | High | Also affects @openzeppelin/contracts |
| GHSA-g4vp-m682-qqmp OpenZeppelin Contracts vulnerable to Improper Escaping of Output | Medium | Also affects @openzeppelin/contracts |
| GHSA-wprv-93r4-jj2p OpenZeppelin Contracts using MerkleProof multiproofs may allow proving arbitrary leaves for specific trees | Medium | Also affects @openzeppelin/contracts |
| GHSA-5h3x-9wvq-w4m2 OpenZeppelin Contracts's governor proposal creation may be blocked by frontrunning | Medium | Also affects @openzeppelin/contracts |
| GHSA-mx2q-35m2-x2rh OpenZeppelin Contracts TransparentUpgradeableProxy clashing selector calls may not be delegated | Medium | Also affects @openzeppelin/contracts |
| GHSA-93hq-5wgc-jc82 GovernorCompatibilityBravo may trim proposal calldata | High | Also affects @openzeppelin/contracts |
| GHSA-878m-3g6q-594q OpenZeppelin Contracts contains Incorrect Calculation | Medium | Also affects @openzeppelin/contracts |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor