GHSA-9f6m-65v9-x9g2 CVE-2026-7711 PYSEC-2026-2648
MindsDB has an Improper Access Control Issue
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.28%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 20.96% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-284 Improper Access Control
- Fix
- None yet
- No fixed version published
Description
A weakness has been identified in MindsDB up to 26.01. This impacts the function exec of the file mindsdb/integrations/handlers/byom_handler/proc_wrapper.py of the component Engine Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to unrestricted upload. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| mindsdb | <= 26.0.1 |
No fix yet |
How to fix
No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Proof of concept
CVSS 3.1 7.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-284: Improper Access Control
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-4894-xqv6-vrfq MindsDB: Path Traversal in /api/files Leading to Remote Code Execution | High | Also affects mindsdb |
| GHSA-6xw9-2p64-7622 MindsDB affected by a SSRF vulnerability | High | Also affects mindsdb |
| GHSA-qqhf-pm3j-96g7 MindsDB has improper sanitation of filepath that leads to information disclosure and DOS | Critical | Also affects mindsdb |
| GHSA-32fj-r8qw-r8w8 MindsDB Cross-site Scripting vulnerability | Medium | Also affects mindsdb |
| GHSA-crmg-rp64-5cm3 MindsDB Eval Injection vulnerability | High | Also affects mindsdb |
| GHSA-wf9g-c67g-h4ch MindsDB Eval Injection vulnerability | High | Also affects mindsdb |
| GHSA-wcjw-3v6p-4v3r MindsDB Eval Injection vulnerability | High | Also affects mindsdb |
| GHSA-v6g6-3cm3-vf6c MindsDB Eval Injection vulnerability | High | Also affects mindsdb |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor