GHSA-8737-qx52-hjff CVE-2026-71486 PYSEC-2026-3936
vLLM: Derender endpoints decode caller-supplied GenerateResponse token IDs without output bounds
- Severity
- 4.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.37%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 31.34% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
- Fix
0.26.0- Upgrade vllm to this version or later
Description
Summary
The /v1/completions/derender and /v1/chat/completions/derender endpoints accept caller-supplied GenerateResponse objects and postprocess every nested choices[*].token_ids list directly. Unlike the normal render/generate path, derender does not enforce model context length, resolved max_tokens, max_num_seqs, choice-count, or response-size bounds before detokenizing and returning the supplied token IDs. An authenticated API client can therefore make the CPU-only render frontend, or any server exposing these /v1 derender routes, spend CPU and memory proportional to attacker-chosen generated-output-shaped JSON rather than to a bounded generation result.
Technical Details
The render router registers /v1/chat/completions/derender and /v1/completions/derender in vllm/entrypoints/serve/render/api_router.py, and the OpenAI API server attaches this router whenever "generate" or "render" is in supported_tasks (vllm/entrypoints/openai/api_server.py). The routes are under /v1, so they are part of the OpenAI-compatible HTTP API surface and are protected by the API-key middleware when --api-key is configured.
The request types trust generated-output-shaped data from the client. In vllm/entrypoints/serve/disagg/protocol.py, GenerateResponseChoice accepts token_ids: list[int] | None = None, GenerateResponse accepts choices: list[GenerateResponseChoice], and DerenderCompletionRequest accepts generate_responses: list[GenerateResponse]. These fields have no max length, max item count, or relationship to a prior GenerateRequest.
The sink is OnlineDerenderer. derender_completion() iterates every supplied generate_responses entry and every nested choice, calls tokenizer.decode(choice.token_ids, skip_special_tokens=True), appends the decoded text to the response choices, and increments total_completion_tokens from the same supplied list length. derender_chat() has the same shape for a single supplied generate_response, and can also feed the decoded text into tool/reasoning parsers when a parser and chat_request are present. ServingRender.derender_completion_response() calls online_derenderer.derender_completion(request.generate_responses, request.prompt_tokens) before applying any completion-level validation beyond the model check.
Normal render and generation paths derive output limits from max_model_len, the rendered prompt length, request max_tokens / max_completion_tokens, and scheduler limits. Derender bypasses that invariant because it accepts the already-generated output shape directly from the HTTP caller. The missing invariant is: derender should only postprocess bounded generated output, and client-supplied derender payloads must be rejected if their nested generated token/logprob structures exceed the same limits that generation would have enforced.
PoV
The following bounded PoV can be run from a current vLLM checkout containing PR #43606. It asserts the current source facts for the derender routes, unchecked request fields, and decode sink, then simulates the same derender loop with a counting tokenizer. The negative control is a one-choice, 32-token response. The amplified payload keeps the test bounded but demonstrates that all decoded work and returned text scale directly with caller-supplied GenerateResponse contents.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import subprocess
from dataclasses import dataclass
from pathlib import Path
SOURCE = Path(".")
def require_source_fact(path: str, needles: list[str]) -> None:
text = (SOURCE / path).read_text()
missing = [needle for needle in needles if needle not in text]
if missing:
raise AssertionError(f"{path} missing expected facts: {missing}")
def source_head() -> str:
return subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "HEAD"], cwd=SOURCE, text=True).strip()
@dataclass
class Choice:
index: int
token_ids: list[int]
@dataclass
class GenerateResponse:
request_id: str
choices: list[Choice]
class CountingTokenizer:
def __init__(self) -> None:
self.decode_calls = 0
self.decoded_ids = 0
def decode(self, token_ids: list[int], *, skip_special_tokens: bool = True) -> str:
self.decode_calls += 1
self.decoded_ids += len(token_ids)
return "x" * len(token_ids)
def derender_completion_like_current_head(generate_responses: list[GenerateResponse], tokenizer: CountingTokenizer) -> tuple[int, int, int]:
output_chars = 0
choices = 0
total_completion_tokens = 0
for gen in generate_responses:
for choice in gen.choices:
if not choice.token_ids:
raise ValueError("choice has empty or null token_ids")
decoded_text = tokenizer.decode(choice.token_ids, skip_special_tokens=True)
output_chars += len(decoded_text)
total_completion_tokens += len(choice.token_ids)
choices += 1
return choices, total_completion_tokens, output_chars
def make_payload(responses: int, choices_per_response: int, tokens_per_choice: int) -> list[GenerateResponse]:
token_ids = [42] * tokens_per_choice
return [GenerateResponse(request_id=f"gen-{r}", choices=[Choice(index=c, token_ids=list(token_ids)) for c in range(choices_per_response)]) for r in range(responses)]
def run_case(name: str, payload: list[GenerateResponse]) -> None:
tokenizer = CountingTokenizer()
choices, completion_tokens, output_chars = derender_completion_like_current_head(payload, tokenizer)
print(f"{name}: responses={len(payload)} choices={choices} decode_calls={tokenizer.decode_calls} decoded_token_ids={tokenizer.decoded_ids} completion_tokens={completion_tokens} output_chars={output_chars}")
require_source_fact("vllm/entrypoints/serve/render/api_router.py", ['"/v1/completions/derender"', '"/v1/chat/completions/derender"', "app.include_router(router)"])
require_source_fact("vllm/entrypoints/serve/disagg/protocol.py", ["class GenerateResponseChoice(BaseModel):", "token_ids: list[int] | None = None", "class GenerateResponse(BaseModel):", "choices: list[GenerateResponseChoice]", "class DerenderCompletionRequest(BaseModel):", "generate_responses: list[GenerateResponse]"])
require_source_fact("vllm/renderers/online_derenderer.py", ["async def derender_completion(", "for gen, pt in zip(generate_responses, prompt_tokens_list):", "for choice in gen.choices:", "decoded_text = tokenizer.decode(", "total_completion_tokens += len(choice.token_ids)"])
print("source_checks=ok")
print(f"source_head={source_head()}")
run_case("negative_control", make_payload(responses=1, choices_per_response=1, tokens_per_choice=32))
run_case("amplified_payload", make_payload(responses=16, choices_per_response=4, tokens_per_choice=8192))
print("observation=derender decodes every caller-supplied token id before any max_model_len, max_tokens, max_num_seqs, or response-size check")
Impact
An attacker with access to the /v1 API can send derender requests that consume CPU and memory in the frontend/postprocessing process and can cause large responses unrelated to any bounded generation. In disaggregated deployments, this affects the CPU-only render frontend; in servers where the render router is attached alongside generation, it affects the same OpenAI-compatible server process that handles normal client traffic. This can degrade availability for other clients sharing the process.
Likely CWE: CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption) / CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling). Conservative CVSS v3.1: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L (4.3). This is not Low severity because a regular network API client can induce availability impact in a shared service without local access, invalid model artifacts, or special runtime privileges. If the server is deployed without API-key enforcement for /v1, the privileges component becomes PR:N.
Suggested Fix
Validate derender payloads before any detokenization or parser invocation. Apply bounded limits to generate_response(s), choices, token_ids, prompt_logprobs, logprobs.content, top_logprobs, and routed_experts that are at least as strict as the corresponding generation-side limits. For completions, reject generate_responses counts above the number of prompts that /v1/completions/render would have produced, and reject total nested choice counts above max_num_seqs / n limits. For each choice, reject token_ids longer than the resolved output-token budget, or require derender callers to submit the original bounded GenerateRequest / sampling metadata and validate the GenerateResponse against it before decoding.
Add regression tests for both derender endpoints. The tests should show that a normal bounded derender payload succeeds, while oversized generate_responses, oversized choices, oversized token_ids, and oversized logprob/top-logprob structures are rejected before tokenizer.decode() or parser execution.
Affected Package/Versions
Confirmed affected: current main at ddd3855a28a561a5bb54d380c6e6b8b1e883cc4a and downstream/nightly builds that include the derender endpoints introduced by PR #43606. The derender router, request models, decode sink, render serving bridge, and OpenAI API router attachment have no relevant diff from 00e045b7c7b82599f626779e111233abd4d0a64e to ddd3855a28a561a5bb54d380c6e6b8b1e883cc4a.
Latest release checked: v0.23.0, published on 2026-06-15. Its vllm/entrypoints/serve/render/api_router.py does not expose /v1/completions/derender or /v1/chat/completions/derender, so v0.23.0 was not confirmed affected.
Advisory History
PR #43606 ("[Render] Add /derender endpoints for disaggregated postprocessing") introduced the derender endpoints on main. PR #44285 later refactored the render serving code, and current head still contains the unchecked derender flow.
Public issue search for derender GenerateResponse token_ids returned no reports. Public search for "/v1/completions/derender" returned the derender feature RFC #42729 and unrelated bugs, but no size-bound, DoS, or generated-output postprocessing issue.
Related public request-fanout and resource-bound advisories are distinct:
GHSA-3mwp-wvh9-7528covers an unboundednparameter on the normal OpenAI completion/chat generation routes. Its root cause is missing upper-bound validation for generated sequence count, its sink is request fanout and request-object copying into the async engine path before scheduling, its precondition is a caller-controlledn, and its fix surface is a cap on generated sequence count. This report reaches/v1/completions/derenderand/v1/chat/completions/derender, not the normal generate routes; its root cause is unchecked caller-suppliedGenerateResponse/choices/token_idsstructures, its sink isOnlineDerendererdetokenization and response construction after generation, its precondition is access to the derender API with generated-output-shaped JSON, and its fix surface is derender payload validation before decode.- PR
#45390includes theGHSA-83mh-6mwq-3hg9batch-message fanout fix class: it bounds the outerBatchChatCompletionRequest.messagesconversation list to prevent one request from creating many conversation/request objects before normal generation. This report has no batch conversation list and does not rely onn; one derender request can instead supply oversized nestedGenerateResponsechoices and token IDs that are detokenized and returned directly. A batch-messagemax_lengthlimit would not bound derendergenerate_response(s)or per-choice token/logprob structures.
The completed local report titled "Explicit truncation_side disables tokenizer-level prompt truncation" is also distinct. That report used /v1/completions and /v1/chat/completions with ordinary prompt text plus truncate_prompt_tokens and explicit truncation_side; its root cause was the renderer omitting tokenizer-level max_length and the pre-tokenization character guard before post-token slicing; its sink was prompt tokenization; and its fix surface was preserving tokenizer-level truncation or rejecting over-budget prompts before tokenization. This derender report uses /v1 derender routes, has no prompt text tokenization or truncation-side control, starts from caller-supplied generated-output token IDs, and needs aggregate bounds on derender generate_response(s), choices, token IDs, logprobs, parser inputs, and response construction before detokenization.
Other adjacent vLLM advisories for Rust/gRPC token-id and logprob bounds, structured-output grammar amplification, repetition-detection windows, and pooling/rerank batch fanout are distinct. Those issues affect Rust/gRPC request conversion, grammar compilation, scheduler loops, or engine fanout. This issue affects /v1 derender postprocessing of caller-supplied generated-output objects and requires derender-specific request validation before detokenization.
Resources
vllm/entrypoints/serve/render/api_router.pyvllm/entrypoints/serve/disagg/protocol.pyvllm/renderers/online_derenderer.pyvllm/entrypoints/serve/render/serving.pyvllm/entrypoints/openai/api_server.py- PR
#43606:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/43606 - PR
#44285:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/44285 GHSA-3mwp-wvh9-7528:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-3mwp-wvh9-7528- PR
#45390:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/45390 - Release
v0.23.0:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/releases/tag/v0.23.0
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| vllm | < 0.26.0 |
0.26.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
vllm PyPI → 0.26.0
- pip
pip install --upgrade "vllm>=0.26.0"- poetry
poetry add "vllm>=0.26.0"- uv
uv add "vllm>=0.26.0"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 4.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.
How to prevent it
- Requirements: Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
- Architecture and Design: Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place, and it will help the administrator to identify who is committing the abuse. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, typically by using increasing time delays uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution can be difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply requires more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: If the program must fail, ensure that it fails gracefully (fails closed). There may be a temptation to simply let the program fail poorly in cases such as low memory conditions, but an attacker may be able to assert control before the software has fully exited. Alternately, an uncontrolled failure could cause cascading problems with other downstream components; for example, the program could send a signal to a downstream process so the process immediately knows that a problem has occurred and has a better chance of recovery. Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
- Operation, Architecture and Design: Use quotas or other resource-limiting settings provided by the operating system or environment. For example, when managing system resources in POSIX, setrlimit() can be used to set limits for certain types of resources, and getrlimit() can determine how many resources are available. However, these functions are not available on all operating systems. When the current levels get close to the maximum that is defined for the application (see CWE-770), then limit the allocation of further resources to privileged users; alternately, begin releasing resources for less-privileged users. While this mitigation may protect the system from attack, it will not necessarily stop attackers from adversely impacting other users. Ensure that the application performs the appropriate error checks and error handling in case resources become unavailable (CWE-703).
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-8397-8qf6-f2gm vLLM: Phi-4 multimodal audio encoder materializes and retains full attention matrices: a single max-length audio OOM-crashes the vLLM engine | Medium | Also affects vllm |
| GHSA-x567-49g5-p4cf vLLM: Responses API bypasses trust_request_chat_template for chat_template_kwargs | Medium | Also affects vllm |
| GHSA-vvpg-rrww-wpmh vLLM: Permissive default CORS origins allow cross-origin requests to the vLLM HTTP server | Medium | Also affects vllm |
| GHSA-q97c-p368-75c4 vLLM: Out-of-vocabulary prompt token id passes input validation and triggers a CUDA device-side assert (engine crash / DoS) | Medium | Also affects vllm |
| GHSA-h3rc-j82p-2c3h vLLM: Untrusted EPS inputs can trigger denial of service or Ghostscript RCE | High | Also affects vllm |
| GHSA-gq5q-89c7-vhvx vLLM DeepSeek-OCR image processing vulnerable to denial of service | Medium | Also affects vllm |
| GHSA-6757-hggm-hp2w vLLM: Public multimodal SHM handle forgery reaches worker-side `pickle.loads()` with insecure serialization disabled | High | Also affects vllm |
| GHSA-542m-9234-8gvf vLLM: DoS via unbounded chat_template Jinja2 rendering exhausts the renderer thread pool | Medium | Also affects vllm |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor