Skip to content

GHSA-7xwp-2cpp-p8r7 CVE-2025-53826 GO-2025-3812

File Browser’s insecure JWT handling can lead to session replay attacks after logout

Critical Go
Severity
0.0 / 10
Critical · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.55%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 46.17% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-305 Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness
CWE-384 Session Fixation
CWE-613 Insufficient Session Expiration
Fix
None yet
No fixed version published

Description

Summary

File Browser’s authentication system issues long-lived JWT tokens that remain valid even after the user logs out. Please refer to the CWE's listed in this report for further reference and system standards. In summary, the main issue is:

  • Tokens remain valid after logout (session replay attacks)

In this report, I used docker as the documentation instruct:

docker run \
    -v filebrowser_data:/srv \
    -v filebrowser_database:/database \
    -v filebrowser_config:/config \
    -p 8080:80 \
    filebrowser/filebrowser

Details

Issue: Tokens remain valid after logout (session replay attacks)

After logging in and receiving a JWT token, the user can explicitly "log out." However, this action does not invalidate the issued JWT. Any captured token can be replayed post-logout until it expires naturally. The backend does not track active sessions or invalidate existing tokens on logout. Login request:

POST /api/login HTTP/1.1
Host: machine.local:8090
Content-Length: 69

{"username":"admin","password":"password-here","recaptcha":""}

The check found in the code https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/blob/master/http/auth.go is not enough. There is no server-side blacklist or token invalidation on logout. Token renewal and validity only depends on expiry and user store timestamps:

expired := !tk.VerifyExpiresAt(time.Now().Add(time.Hour), true)
updated := tk.IssuedAt != nil && tk.IssuedAt.Unix() < d.store.Users.LastUpdate(tk.User.ID)

PoC

Issue: Tokens remain valid after logout (session replay attacks)

  • Login and capture the generate JWT. Eg. the http request:
POST /api/login HTTP/1.1
Host: machine.local:8090
Content-Length: 69

{"username":"admin","password":"password-here","recaptcha":""}
  • Logout in the dashboard. And then try to use the old generated JWT to access any authenticated endpoint eg:
GET /api/resources HTTP/1.1
Host: machine.local:8090
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
X-Auth: Old-JWT-token-here
Content-Length: 173
Accept: */*
Referer: http://machine.local:8090/files/
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.9
Content-Length: 26

Connection: keep-alive

Impact

  • A valid JWT remains active after user logout.
  • If stolen, tokens persist access indefinitely until expiry.
  • Violates OWASP Top 10 A2:2021 - Broken Authentication.

Recommendations

  • Read all CWE's attached in this report
  • Invalidate JWTs on logout via session store / token blacklist.
  • Reduce JWT ExpiresAt where possible or use short-lived + refresh tokens.

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
<= 2.39.0
No fix yet
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
all versions
No fix yet
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2
<= 2.39.0
No fix yet
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2
all versions
No fix yet

How to fix

No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Proof of concept

CVSS 3.1 9.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness

The authentication algorithm is sound, but the implemented mechanism can be bypassed as the result of a separate weakness that is primary to the authentication error.

CWE-384: Session Fixation

Authenticating a user, or otherwise establishing a new user session, without invalidating any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Invalidate any existing session identifiers prior to authorizing a new user session.
  • Architecture and Design: For platforms such as ASP that do not generate new values for sessionid cookies, utilize a secondary cookie. In this approach, set a secondary cookie on the user's browser to a random value and set a session variable to the same value. If the session variable and the cookie value ever don't match, invalidate the session, and force the user to log on again.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

CWE-613: Insufficient Session Expiration

According to WASC, "Insufficient Session Expiration is when a web site permits an attacker to reuse old session credentials or session IDs for authorization."

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Set sessions/credentials expiration date.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-833g-cqhp-h72j
File Browser: Share API exposes the password hash and bypass token
Low Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-83xp-526h-j3ww
File Browser: Archive builder turns backslash filenames into path traversal (zip-slip)
Medium Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-7rc3-g7h6-22m7
File Browser: Colliding username normalization gives two users the same home directory
High Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-8wc8-hf36-mjh9
File Browser: ScopedFs follows a dangling symlink on write, letting a scoped user create files outside their scope
Medium Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-fmm7-x4gx-8jhr
File Browser: Out-of-scope file deletion by a Create-only scoped user via symlink-following RemoveAll in upload failure-cleanup
High Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
File Browser: Authentication Bypass via Proxy Auth Header Forgery
Critical Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
File Browser: Command Injection via Authentication Hook Shell Substitution (Pre-Authentication RCE)
Critical Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
GHSA-8c9q-7855-wfxq
File Browser has a Command Execution Allowlist Bypass via Shell Metacharacter Injection
High Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor