Skip to content

GHSA-7x43-mpfg-r9wj CVE-2026-28696

Craft CMS has IDOR via GraphQL @parseRefs

High Packagist
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.49%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 42.35% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
4.17.0-beta.1
Upgrade craftcms/cms to this version or later

Description

The GraphQL directive @parseRefs, intended to parse internal reference tags (e.g., {user:1:email}), can be abused by both authenticated users and unauthenticated guests (if a Public Schema is enabled) to access sensitive attributes of any element in the CMS. The implementation in Elements::parseRefs fails to perform authorization checks, allowing attackers to read data they are not authorized to view.

Vulnerability Details

craft\services\Elements::parseRefs identifies reference tags and resolves them using _getRefTokenReplacement. This method fetches the referenced element and accesses the specified attribute via $element->$attribute.

  • Missing Auth Check: It bypasses canView() checks.
  • Polymorphic Access: getElementTypeByRefHandle allows referencing any element type (entry, asset, user, category).
  • Custom Field Access: Since Craft elements use __get() to resolve custom field handles, an attacker is not limited to core attributes. They can exfiltrate any custom field data by enumerating the field handle (e.g. {entry:123:privateNotes}).

Attack Vectors

  1. Privilege Escalation / User Data Leak

An attacker can enumerate sensitive attributes of administrators or other users.

  • Payload: {user:1:email} or {user:1:photoId}
  1. Arbitrary Property Reflection & Server-Side Logic Execution

The vulnerability allows reflecting any accessible property of the underlying Element model.

  • Username/Admin Enumeration: {user:1:username} (Confirmed: returns admin), {user:1:admin}.
  • Internal Path Disclosure: Accessing methods that trigger errors (e.g., {user:1:authKey}) exposes full server stack traces in the GraphQL error response (e.g., Exception: No user session token exists with paths like /var/www/html/...).
  1. IDOR on Private Entries & Assets (Polymorphism)

The vulnerability is not limited to Users. Reference tags can target any element type.

  • Payload: {entry:456:myConfidentialField} (Bypasses canView checks).
  • Asset Path Leakage: {volume:1:path} can expose internal file system paths.
  1. Unauthenticated Exploitation (Public Schema)

Confirmed locally. The @parseRefs directive is active in the Public Schema. By injecting a payload into a public-facing field (e.g., a "News" entry title), an unauthenticated guest can trigger the resolution and retrieve the sensitive output.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Setup (Admin Panel):
  • Create a Section (e.g., "News") and an Entry Type.
  • Create a new Entry in that section. Set the Title to the payload: {user:1:username} or {user:1:email}.
  • Go to GraphQL > Schemas > Public Schema. Enable it, and ensure "Query for elements in the Site" and "News" section queries are checked.
  1. Execute Exploit (Unauthenticated):
  • Send a POST request to http://localhost:8000/index.php?action=graphql/api:
curl -X POST \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"query": "{ entries { title @parseRefs } }"}'
  1. Observation:
  • The API returns {"data":{"entries":[{"title":"admin"}]}} (or the email).
  • Using {user:1:authKey} triggers an internal server error that leaks the full server path in string format.

Impact

  • Critical Information Disclosure: Full PII enumeration (emails, usernames).
  • System Information Leakage: Absolute server paths via stack traces.
  • Authentication Bypass: Guest accounts can effectively query the database as the system user.

Recommended Fix

Modify Elements::parseRefs to enforce canView permissions on the resolved element before extracting attributes.

References

https://github.com/craftcms/cms/commit/4d98a07e47580f1712095825d3e3c4d67bc9f8b9

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
craftcms/cms
>= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.0-beta.1
4.17.0-beta.1
craftcms/cms
>= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.0-beta.1
5.9.0-beta.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

craftcms/cms Packagist → 4.17.0-beta.1

composer
composer require craftcms/cms:^4.17.0-beta.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
  • Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7vrx-9684-xrf2
Craft CMS stores arbitrary content provided by unauthenticated users in session files
Medium Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-f3gw-9ww9-jmc3
Craft CMS Allows Remote Code Execution
Critical Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-x684-96hh-833x
Craft CMS has a potential RCE with a compromised security key
High Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-2p6p-9rc9-62j9
Craft CMS has potential RCE when PHP `register_argc_argv` config setting is enabled
Critical Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-wg23-69c2-gjc8
Craft CMS: Passkey login accepts replayed WebAuthn assertions
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-957r-qf9p-67xw
Craft CMS: Arbitrary file read via SplFileObject in non-sandboxed template contexts
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-596p-6jv8-775v
Craft CMS: Authenticated leak of secret environment variables
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-xxpx-f366-4xpq
Craft CMS: Authorization bypass: view-only Categories user can modify category structure via structures/move-element
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor