Skip to content

GHSA-7m47-r75r-cx8v CVE-2025-57758

Contao applies improper access control in the back end voters

Medium Packagist
Severity
4.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.26%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 17.41% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Impact

The table access voter in the back end doesn't check if a user is allowed to access the corresponding module.

Patches

Update to Contao 5.3.38 or 5.6.1.

Workarounds

Do not rely solely on the voter and additionally check USER_CAN_ACCESS_MODULE.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, open an issue in contao/contao.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
contao/contao
>= 5.0.0, < 5.3.38
5.3.38
contao/contao
>= 5.4.0-RC1, < 5.6.1
5.6.1
contao/core-bundle
>= 5.0.0, < 5.3.38
5.3.38
contao/core-bundle
>= 5.4.0-RC1, < 5.6.1
5.6.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

contao/contao Packagist → 5.3.38

composer
composer require contao/contao:^5.3.38

contao/core-bundle Packagist → 5.3.38

composer
composer require contao/core-bundle:^5.3.38

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-9ff2-p842-45wq
Contao: Cross-site request forgery in custom backend actions
Low Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-q6wp-fr43-gm9v
Contao: Improper access control in the preview links module
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-5974-gfqc-wrcm
Contao: Improper access control in the table access voter
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-mrvp-7wmx-5m4h
Contao: Path traversal in the images controller
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-mfxh-vp55-7gc6
Contao: The registration module re-sends activation mails
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-x2rp-9qf7-2fmq
Contao: Protected page content is disclosed to anonymous visitors after contao.search.index_protected is disabled
Medium Also affects contao/core-bundle
GHSA-grm4-wm43-9jh5
Contao: Possible path traversal in job download URIs
Low Also affects contao/contao
GHSA-87mg-5grr-rhwh
Contao: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Unvalidated RSS Feed URL in Feed Reader Module
Low Also affects contao/contao
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor