Skip to content

GHSA-79m3-q3wh-c3qm BIT-publify-2022-0574 CVE-2022-0574

Publify Incorrect Authorization

Medium RubyGems
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.84%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 57.89% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
9.2.8
Upgrade publify_core to this version or later

Description

Improper Access Control in GitHub repository publify/publify prior to 9.2.8. Anonymous users can't view but can leave comments on an article in draft mode.

Affected versions

RubyGems

PackageVulnerableFixed in
publify_core
< 9.2.8
9.2.8

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

publify_core RubyGems → 9.2.8

bundler
bundle update publify_core # Gemfile: gem "publify_core", ">= 9.2.8"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-8fm5-gg2f-f66q
Publify Vulnerable To Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Via Redirects Requiring User Interaction
Medium Also affects publify_core
GHSA-g7gf-2rqw-5rwx
Publify contains Weak Password Requirements
Medium Also affects publify_core
GHSA-rc42-jghf-vr8f
Integer overflow in publify_core
Critical Also affects publify_core
GHSA-q3rm-f527-ghxj
Publify Improper Input Validation vulnerability
Critical Also affects publify_core
GHSA-79wq-g4v9-gfj4
Publify Core does not strip metadata from images
Medium Also affects publify_core
GHSA-wmh9-x28j-c6gr
Cross site scripting in publify
Medium Also affects publify_core
GHSA-3h7v-wqw7-ff28
Cross site scripting in publify
Medium Also affects publify_core
GHSA-c273-c6vg-4pv5
Publify has Improper Access Controls
Medium Also affects publify_core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor