Skip to content

GHSA-73cq-mcgh-379c CVE-2026-70489 PYSEC-2026-3644

Open WebUI: Instance-wide stall via automation recurrence rules that force multi-second parsing

Medium PyPI
Severity
6.5 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.57%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 47.35% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1333 Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Fix
0.11.0
Upgrade open-webui to this version or later

Description

Summary

In every affected release, automation recurrence parsing anchors minutely and hourly rules at a fixed date of 2000-01-01 and then walks forward one interval at a time to find the next run. A single FREQ=MINUTELY rule therefore enumerates roughly a quarter-century of occurrences, synchronously, on the event loop that also serves the scheduler, HTTP and WebSocket traffic. Nothing bounds the walk, and nothing moves it off the loop.

Preconditions

Any user who can create an automation. USER_PERMISSIONS_FEATURES_AUTOMATIONS defaults to false, so on a default deployment only an admin can reach the create path; it becomes reachable by ordinary users on any deployment that has granted the automations feature, which is the normal way to make the feature usable. UVICORN_WORKERS defaults to 1, so there is no second worker to absorb the stall. The rule needs no unusual syntax: FREQ=MINUTELY with no DTSTART, or with a DTSTART set well in the past, is enough.

Impact

Availability, against every other user of the instance. One evaluation of RRULE:FREQ=MINUTELY takes 18.9 s of blocking CPU; adding a ten-value BYSECOND list multiplies the walk and takes 64.2 s. FREQ=HOURLY costs 0.34 s and is not materially exploitable on its own. The cost does not stop at creation: once the automation is stored, the scheduler recomputes the next run for every claimed row on each poll, so the same walk repeats on a default 10 s interval and the instance stays wedged rather than recovering. Instances that have not enabled the automations feature for non-admin users are exposed only to an admin doing this.

Fix

Fixed in 0.11.0. Sub-daily rules are now anchored to the current clock instead of the year-2000 date, so the walk starts at the next occurrence rather than a quarter-century behind it. A caller-supplied DTSTART is honoured only when the number of occurrences it implies stays under a fixed bound, and is otherwise replaced by the clock-aligned anchor. The same rules that cost 18.9 s and 64.2 s now cost under a millisecond. Upgrading fully resolves the issue, no configuration change is required.

Root cause

Affected component: backend/open_webui/utils/automations.py, _parse_rule, reached from the automation create, update and toggle handlers in backend/open_webui/routers/automations.py and from the scheduler's claim path in backend/open_webui/models/automations.py. Affected setup: every build from 0.9.0 onward, since that is when the automations feature shipped.

The fixed anchor existed to make sub-daily intervals snap to clock boundaries, so that "every 5 minutes" lands on :00, :05, :10 rather than drifting from whenever the automation happened to be created. Snapping only needs a reference point of the right phase, but the implementation used a literal far-past date as that reference and left the recurrence library to walk forward from it. The distance between the anchor and the present is therefore attacker-influenced work that grows with real time, and it was never treated as a cost that needed a bound or a thread.

Proof of concept

Measured cost of a single next-run computation against the shipped 0.10.2 parser:

rule cost
RRULE:FREQ=MINUTELY 18,880 ms
RRULE:FREQ=MINUTELY;BYSECOND=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 64,236 ms
DTSTART:20000101T000000 + RRULE:FREQ=MINUTELY 26,237 ms
RRULE:FREQ=HOURLY 339 ms

Measured at function level deliberately. Persisting such an automation has the scheduler repeat the walk on every poll and wedge the instance indefinitely, which is the actual impact but makes a live end-to-end run destructive to the test instance.

Credits

Reported by @Classic298.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
open-webui
>= 0.9.0, < 0.11.0
0.11.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

open-webui PyPI → 0.11.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webui>=0.11.0"
poetry
poetry add "open-webui>=0.11.0"
uv
uv add "open-webui>=0.11.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 6.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

The product uses a regular expression with a worst-case computational complexity that is inefficient and possibly exponential.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use regular expressions that do not support backtracking, e.g. by removing nested quantifiers.
  • System Configuration: Set backtracking limits in the configuration of the regular expression implementation, such as PHP's pcre.backtrack_limit. Also consider limits on execution time for the process.
  • Implementation: Do not use regular expressions with untrusted input. If regular expressions must be used, avoid using backtracking in the expression.
  • Implementation: Limit the length of the input that the regular expression will process.

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
  • Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
  • Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-wvm9-9g5j-623f
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-4qg5-cxx4-g927
Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth domain allowlist or role policy can still sign in via token exchange
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-jqhh-cjmq-vmv6
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via a cyclic chat message history
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w
Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree
Medium Also affects open-webui
GHSA-34r3-9m95-vq73
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can reach the Azure platform channel via server-side web fetch
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-2724-6cpj-gf3v
Open WebUI: Non-admin users can delete admin-owned external knowledge connections via knowledge base deletion
High Also affects open-webui
GHSA-3pf7-q2g3-wj28
Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can inject chats into another user's folder via chat completions
Medium Also affects open-webui
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor