GHSA-6v9c-7cg6-27q7 CVE-2026-41680
Marked Vulnerable to OOM Denial of Service via Infinite Recursion in marked Tokenizer
- Severity
- 8.7 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.34%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 27.73% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- CWE-674 Uncontrolled Recursion
- CWE-835 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
- Fix
18.0.2- Upgrade marked to this version or later
Description
Summary
A critical Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in marked@18.0.0. By providing a specific 3-byte input sequence a tab, a vertical tab, and a newline (\x09\x0b\n)—an unauthenticated attacker can trigger an infinite recursion loop during parsing. This leads to unbounded memory allocation, causing the host Node.js application to crash via Memory Exhaustion (OOM).
Details
The vulnerability originates in how marked's block tokenizer handles unexpected whitespace characters.
- Tab Character (
\x09) Consumption: Thespace()tokenizer matches standard whitespace using the regex/^(?:[ \t]*(?:\n|$))+/. When parsing the malicious payload (\x09\x0b\n), this rule successfully consumes the initial tab character (\x09). - Vertical Tab (
\x0b) Bypass: The remaining input is now\x0b\n. The newline block rule explicitly looks for spaces or standard tabs ([ \t]) followed by a newline. Because the vertical tab is a legacy ASCII character not accounted for in this rule, it fails to match. - Fallback to Text Tokenizer: None of the standard block tokenizers (blockquote, code, heading, etc.) match
\x0b\n. As a result, the parser falls through to thetexttokenizer (/^[^\n]+/), which matches any character except a newline. - Infinite Recursion: Inside
blockTokens(), thetexttokenizer creates a text token and subsequently callsinlineTokens()on the exact same content. InsideinlineTokens(), the text rule again matches\x0b\nand recursively callsinlineTokens(). This creates an inescapable cycle:blockTokens() → text token → inlineTokens() → text rule matches → inlineTokens() → ...
With each recursive call allocating new token objects and concatenating strings, memory grows indefinitely until the Node.js heap limit is reached.
Vulnerable Code in lib/marked.esm.js (Lexer class, blockTokens()):
// The text tokenizer triggers infinite recursion
if(r=this.tokenizer.text(e)) {
e=e.substring(r.raw.length);
let s=t.at(-1);
s?.type==="text"?(s.raw+=(s.raw.endsWith("\n")?"":"\n")+r.raw, s.text+="\n"+r.text, this.inlineQueue.pop(), this.inlineQueue.at(-1).src=s.text):t.push(r);
// ↑ This calls inlineTokens() internally via the text tokenizer, causing the OOM loop
continue;
}
PoC
This vulnerability can be reproduced using any standard Node.js environment with marked@18.0.0 installed.
- Create a file named
poc.jswith the following content:
const marked = require('marked');
// The vulnerable 3-byte pattern: tab + vertical tab + newline
const vulnerableInput = '\x09\x0b\n';
console.log('Attempting to parse malicious payload...');
try {
marked.parse(vulnerableInput);
} catch(e) {
console.log('Error:', e.message);
}
- Run the script:
node poc.js - Result: The process will hang briefly as memory spikes, ultimately crashing with:
FATAL ERROR: Reached heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory.
Impact
This is a High-Severity Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability via Memory Exhaustion.
Impacted Parties: Any application, API, chatbot, or documentation system using marked@18.0.0 (and potentially earlier versions) to parse untrusted user input is vulnerable.
Because the payload requires zero authentication and only 3 bytes of data, it requires virtually no resources from the attacker to remotely crash the service and achieve a total loss of availability for the targeted application.
Affected versions
npm
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
marked npm → 18.0.2
- npm
npm install marked@18.0.2- yarn
yarn add marked@18.0.2- pnpm
pnpm add marked@18.0.2
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 8.7
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion
The product does not properly control the amount of recursion that takes place, consuming excessive resources, such as allocated memory or the program stack.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: Ensure that an end condition will be reached under all logic conditions. The end condition may include checking against the depth of recursion and exiting with an error if the recursion goes too deep. The complexity of the end condition contributes to the effectiveness of this action.
- Implementation: Increase the stack size.
CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')
The product contains an iteration or loop with an exit condition that cannot be reached, i.e., an infinite loop.
References
Advisories
Packages
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-p9wx-2529-fp83 Marked allows Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attacks | Medium | Also affects marked |
| GHSA-5v2h-r2cx-5xgj Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked | High | Also affects marked |
| GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked | High | Also affects marked |
| GHSA-4r62-v4vq-hr96 Regular Expression Denial of Service (REDoS) in Marked | High | Also affects marked |
| GHSA-ch52-vgq2-943f Regular Expression Denial of Service in marked | Low | Also affects marked |
| GHSA-9cw2-jqp5-7x39 Multiple Content Injection Vulnerabilities in marked | Medium | Also affects marked |
| GHSA-xf5p-87ch-gxw2 Marked ReDoS due to email addresses being evaluated in quadratic time | Medium | Also affects marked |
| GHSA-vfvf-mqq8-rwqc Sanitization bypass using HTML Entities in marked | Medium | Also affects marked |
Credits: MaanVader
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor