GHSA-6r2x-8pq8-9489 CVE-2024-46993
Electron vulnerable to Heap Buffer Overflow in NativeImage
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.16%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 4.75% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow
- Fix
28.3.2- Upgrade electron to this version or later
Description
Impact
The nativeImage.createFromPath() and nativeImage.createFromBuffer() functions call a function downstream that is vulnerable to a heap buffer overflow. An Electron program that uses either of the affected functions is vulnerable to a buffer overflow if an attacker is in control of the image's height, width, and contents.
Workaround
There are no app-side workarounds for this issue. You must update your Electron version to be protected.
Patches
v28.3.2v29.3.3v30.0.3
For More Information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at security@electronjs.org.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| electron | < 28.3.2 |
28.3.2 |
| electron | >= 29.0.0-alpha.1, < 29.3.3 |
29.3.3 |
| electron | >= 30.0.0-alpha.1, < 30.0.3 |
30.0.3 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
electron npm → 28.3.2
- npm
npm install electron@28.3.2- yarn
yarn add electron@28.3.2- pnpm
pnpm add electron@28.3.2
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Unreported
Weakness
CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
How to prevent it
- Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
- Architecture and Design: Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
- Operation, Build and Compilation: Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
- Operation, Build and Compilation: Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking. For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
- Implementation: Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
- Implementation: Do not use dangerous functions such as gets. Look for their safe equivalent, which checks for the boundary.
- Operation: Use OS-level preventative functionality. This is not a complete solution, but it provides some defense in depth.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-qqvq-6xgj-jw8g Electron affected by libvpx's heap buffer overflow in vp8 encoding | High Known exploited | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-j7hp-h8jx-5ppr libwebp: OOB write in BuildHuffmanTable | High Known exploited | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-995f-9x5r-2rcj Heap buffer overflow in GPU | Critical Known exploited | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-jr5w-w6x2-84p9 Electron: Mitigation for compromised eMudhra intermediate certificates | High | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-h3v5-h239-pg29 Electron: Off-screen rendering on macOS trusts GPU-supplied frame geometry | Low | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-3qxv-5xgr-q7w9 Electron: Frame subscription trusts GPU-supplied frame geometry | Low | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-997q-gvvc-jwmx Electron: openExternal permission requests can be attributed to the wrong origin | Medium | Also affects electron |
| GHSA-fw47-9c62-h3vw Electron: HID and USB permission checks can be attributed to the wrong origin | Medium | Also affects electron |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor