Skip to content

GHSA-6q4w-9x56-rmwq CVE-2024-27933

Deno arbitrary file descriptor close via `op_node_ipc_pipe()` leading to permission prompt bypass

High crates.io
Severity
8.2 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
2.28%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 83.10% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
Fix
1.39.1
Upgrade deno to this version or later

Description

Summary

Use of raw file descriptors in op_node_ipc_pipe() leads to premature close of arbitrary file descriptors, allowing standard input to be re-opened as a different resource resulting in permission prompt bypass.

Details

Node child_process IPC relies on the JS side to pass the raw IPC file descriptor to op_node_ipc_pipe(), which returns a IpcJsonStreamResource ID associated with the file descriptor. On closing the resource, the raw file descriptor is closed together.

Although closing a file descriptor is seemingly a harmless task, this has been known to be exploitable:

  • With --allow-read and --allow-write permissions, one can open /dev/ptmx as stdin. This device happily accepts TTY ioctls and pipes anything written into it back to the reader.
    • This has been presented in a hacking competition (WACON 2023 Quals "dino jail").
    • However, the precondition of this challenge was heavily contrived: fd 0 has manually been closed by FFI and setuid() was used to drop permissions and deny access to /proc since global write permissions are usually equivalent to arbitrary code execution (/proc/self/mem).

As this vulnerability conveniently allows us to close stdin (fd 0) without any FFI, we can open any resource that when read returns y, Y or A as its first character (runtimes/permissions/prompter.rs) to bypass the prompt.

There is a caveat however - all stdio/stdin/stderr streams are locked, after which clear_stdin() is called. This invokes libc::tcflush(0, libc::TCIFLUSH) which fails on a non-TTY file descriptor.

This can be exploited by widening the race window between clear_stdin() and the next stdin_lock.read_line(). Notably, the prompt message contains the requested resource name (path) which is filtered by strip_ansi_codes_and_ascii_control(). This is also concatenated by write!() to make a single buffer printed out to stderr. Thus, if we request a very long resource name, the window will widen allowing us to easily and stably race another Worker that closes fd 0 and opens a resource starting with an A\n within the race window.

Note that attacker does not need any permissions to exploit this bug to a full permission prompt bypass, as Cache API can be used to create and open files with controlled content without any permissions. Refer to the Impact section for more details.

PoC

Testing environment is Docker image denoland/deno:alpine-1.39.0@sha256:95064390f2c115673762bfc4fe15b1a7f81c859038b8c02b277ede7cd8a2ccbf.

Below PoC closes stdout (fd 1) and then prints two lines, one on stdout and one on stderr. Only the latter line is shown as stdout file descriptor is closed.

const ops = Deno[Deno.internal].core.ops;

// open fd 1 as ipc stream resource
const rid = ops.op_node_ipc_pipe(1);

// close resource & fd 1
Deno.close(rid);

// this should not be seen (stdout)
console.log('not seen');

// but this is seen (stderr)
console.error('seen');

Below is /proc/$(pgrep deno)/fd right after executing the last line of the above PoC. We see that fd 1 is indeed missing.

total 0
dr-x------ 2 root root 30 Dec 18 07:07 ./
dr-xr-xr-x 9 root root  0 Dec 18 07:07 ../
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 0 -> /dev/pts/0
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 10 -> 'pipe:[159305]'
lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 11 -> 'pipe:[159306]'
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 12 -> 'pipe:[159306]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 13 -> /deno-dir/dep_analysis_cache_v1
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 14 -> 'pipe:[159305]'
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 15 -> 'pipe:[159306]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 16 -> /deno-dir/node_analysis_cache_v1
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 17 -> /dev/pts/0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 18 -> /dev/pts/0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 19 -> /dev/pts/0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 2 -> /dev/pts/0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 20 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 21 -> 'anon_inode:[eventfd]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 22 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 23 -> 'socket:[159302]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 24 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 25 -> 'anon_inode:[eventfd]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 26 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 27 -> 'socket:[159302]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 28 -> 'socket:[159310]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 29 -> 'socket:[159308]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 3 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 30 -> 'socket:[159309]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 4 -> 'anon_inode:[eventfd]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 5 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 6 -> 'socket:[159302]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 7 -> 'socket:[159303]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 8 -> 'socket:[159302]'
lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 9 -> 'pipe:[159305]'

Impact

Use of raw file descriptors in op_node_ipc_pipe() leads to premature close of arbitrary file descriptors. This allow standard input (fd 0) to be closed and re-opened for a different resource, which allows a silent permission prompt bypass. This is exploitable by an attacker controlling the code executed inside a Deno runtime to obtain arbitrary code execution on the host machine regardless of permissions.

This bug is known to be exploitable - there is a working exploit that achieves arbitrary code execution by bypassing prompts from zero permissions, additionally abusing the fact that Cache API lacks filesystem permission checks. The attack can be conducted silently as stderr can also be closed, suppressing all prompt outputs.

Note that Deno's security model is currently described as follows:

  • All runtime I/O is considered to be privileged and must always be guarded by a runtime permission. This includes filesystem access, network access, etc.
    • The only exception to this is runtime storage explosion attacks that are isolated to a part of the file system, caused by evaluated code (for example, caching big dependencies or no limits on runtime caches such as the Web Cache API).

Although it is ambiguous if the fundamental lack of file system permission checks on Web Cache API is a vulnerability or not, the reporter have not reported this as a vulnerability assuming that this is a known risk (or a feature).

Affected version of Deno is 1.39.0.

  • Introduced with commit 5a91a06
  • Fixed with commit 55fac9f

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
deno
>= 1.39.0, < 1.39.1
1.39.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

deno crates.io → 1.39.1

cargo
cargo update -p deno --precise 1.39.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-x2qc-cmh9-f4hf
Deno: Denial of service via non-ASCII bytes in WebSocket response headers
Medium Also affects deno
GHSA-8xpq-cjcf-3wh9
Deno: Permission Bypass via Unicode Normalization Mismatch on macOS (APFS)
High Also affects deno
GHSA-968w-xfqw-vp9q
Deno: BYONM module resolution allows `package.json` main path traversal to bypass `--allow-read` restrictions
Medium Also affects deno
GHSA-v8fw-85r8-5m23
Deno: Node TCPWrap numeric hostname aliases bypass --deny-net resolved-IP deny checks
Medium Also affects deno
GHSA-9xg4-qhm4-g43w
Deno: Miller-Rabin Primality Test Allows Zero Rounds
High Also affects deno
GHSA-7xh3-mhg9-jcw8
Deno: Command Injection via spawnSync & spawn on Windows
High Also affects deno
GHSA-4c8g-jvcx-v4hv
Deno: process.loadEnvFile() bypasses env permission checks and mutates process.env with only read access
Medium Also affects deno
GHSA-83pc-3rw9-qpwj
Deno: WebSocket API sandbox bypass via missing post-DNS check
Medium Also affects deno
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor