Skip to content

GHSA-697h-3q6m-jwp4 CVE-2025-43809

Liferay Portal Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Medium Maven
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.18%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 7.66% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Fix
101.0.0
Upgrade com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl to this version or later

Description

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the server (license) registration page in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.7, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.9, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to register a server license via the 'orderUuid' parameter.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl
< 101.0.0
101.0.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl Maven → 101.0.0

maven
<dependency><groupId>com.liferay.portal</groupId><artifactId>com.liferay.portal.impl</artifactId><version>101.0.0</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl:101.0.0")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Active
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
Low
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 4.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. [REF-330] Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF. [REF-45]
  • Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
  • Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330). [REF-332]
  • Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
  • Architecture and Design: Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller: When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as a cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if the form value and the cookie value are the same. Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value. If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. [REF-331]
  • Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
  • Implementation: Check the HTTP Referer header to see if the request originated from an expected page. This could break legitimate functionality, because users or proxies may have disabled sending the Referer for privacy reasons.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-6533-fhr2-f38h
Liferay Portal and DXP use an incorrect cache-control header
Medium Also affects com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl
GHSA-xcj6-xpjg-c4xr
Liferay Portal Stores Password Reset Tokens in Plain Text
Medium Also affects com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl
GHSA-q95h-87j6-273x
Liferay Portal ComboServlet denial of service via large file combination
High Also affects com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl
GHSA-rx48-gqc2-4w47
Liferay Portal reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the google_gaget
Medium Also affects com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl
GHSA-pfwq-mr9g-gq6m
Liferay is Vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Medium Also affects com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl
GHSA-2hm7-r8f3-423h
Liferay Portal vulnerable to path traversal and denial-of-service in the ComboServlet
High Also affects com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl
GHSA-95h4-8mqc-4mpf
Liferay Portal has unchecked input for loop condition vulnerability in XML-RPC
High Also affects com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl
GHSA-xvgg-9h29-4g34
Liferay Portal has Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
High Also affects com.liferay.portal:com.liferay.portal.impl
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor