GHSA-65p8-9433-jpcp CVE-2026-52762
YesWiki: Authenticated (Admin) Server-Side Template Injection to Remote Code Execution via Bazar Semantic Templates
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.78%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 55.92% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-1336 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine
- Fix
4.6.6- Upgrade yeswiki/yeswiki to this version or later
Description
Summary
YesWiki Bazar contains a stored Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability in the semantic template feature that can be escalated to confirmed Remote Code Execution (RCE). An authenticated administrator can place arbitrary Twig expressions into the Semantic template (Twig) field (bn_sem_template), and that content is later executed server-side when public semantic endpoints are requested.
This was first confirmed through a harmless proof payload where {{ 7 * 7 }} was rendered as 49 through the public JSON-LD endpoint. The finding was then further validated locally by storing a Twig payload that invoked a system-level callable, resulting in command execution and an interactive shell on the test machine.
Because the payload is stored in the form configuration and later triggered through a public endpoint, this issue is both persistent and remotely triggerable after an administrator plants the malicious template.
Details
The vulnerable behavior is in the Bazar semantic rendering flow.
The administrator-editable fields:
bn_sem_templatebn_sem_reverse_template
allow Twig template content to be stored inside a form definition. That content is later rendered by the backend semantic transformer through TemplateEngine::renderFromStringNoEscape(), which passes the user-controlled string into Twig for execution.
Relevant sink:
$json = $this->templateEngine->renderFromStringNoEscape($form['bn_sem_template'], $data);
The rendering helper evaluates the supplied string as a live Twig template:
public function renderFromStringNoEscape(string $templateString, array $data = []): string
{
$wrapped = '{% autoescape false %}' . $templateString . '{% endautoescape %}';
return $this->twig->createTemplate($wrapped)->render($data);
}
This is unsafe because administrator-controlled semantic template text is executed as server-side Twig code rather than treated as inert data. In the validated environment, Twig expressions were first confirmed to execute through a harmless arithmetic payload and were then escalated to operating-system-level command execution by invoking a callable through Twig.
The public trigger path used during validation was:
GET /api/forms/2/entries/json-ld
The attack chain is:
- An administrator stores malicious Twig code in the semantic template field.
- YesWiki saves that payload in the form configuration.
- A later request to the public semantic endpoint causes the backend to render and execute the stored Twig.
- Because the Twig environment is not adequately constrained, the stored payload can escalate from template execution to system command execution.
PoC
The following steps reproduce the issue on the locally validated YesWiki instance.
Stage 1: Confirm Server-Side Template Execution
- Log in to YesWiki as an administrator.
- Open Bazar form management.
- Edit form ID
2(Agendain the validated instance). - Locate the field labeled
Semantic template (Twig). - Replace its content with the following harmless payload:
{"proof":"{{ 7 * 7 }}"}
- Save the form.
- Trigger the public semantic endpoint:
curl -s 'https://target.example/?api/forms/2/entries/json-ld'
- Observe that the server returns evaluated Twig output instead of the literal string
{{ 7 * 7 }}.
Confirmed response:
{"@context":null,"@id":"https:\/\/target.example\/?api\/fiche\/2","@type":["ldp:Container","ldp:BasicContainer"],"dcterms:title":"Agenda","ldp:contains":[{"proof":"49","id":"https:\/\/target.example\/?TesT2"},{"proof":"49","id":"https:\/\/target.example\/?Bordeaux"}]}
Key execution proof:
"proof":"49"
Stage 2: Confirm Remote Code Execution
After confirming SSTI with the harmless payload above, a second locally controlled payload was stored in the same semantic template field to test whether Twig execution could be escalated to command execution. When the public semantic endpoint was requested, the payload executed on the server and established an interactive shell back to the test listener.
Observed local evidence included:
- an inbound connection to the attacker's listener
- an interactive shell prompt on the YesWiki host
- successful command execution from the shell inside the YesWiki project directory
Observed shell output:
Connection received on 172.31.60.19 60308
khizar@Victus:/mnt/c/Users/khiza/Documents/Codex/2026-05-24/i-am-trying-to-make-a/yeswiki-src$ ls
INSTALL.md
LICENSE
Makefile
README.md
SECURITY.md
actions
cache
codex-admin-login.php
composer.json
composer.lock
custom
docker
docs
files
formatters
handlers
includes
index.php
interwiki.conf
javascripts
lang
package.json
private
robots.txt
setup
styles
templates
tests
themes
tools
vendor
wakka.config.php
wakka.php
yeswicli
This confirms that the issue is not limited to template evaluation or data disclosure. In the validated local environment, the stored Twig payload reached full operating-system-level command execution.
Impact
An authenticated administrator can inject arbitrary Twig expressions into Bazar semantic templates, and those expressions are executed server-side when public semantic endpoints are requested.
In the validated environment, this leads to confirmed Remote Code Execution. An attacker with administrator access can:
- execute arbitrary Twig expressions on the server
- store a persistent payload in form configuration
- have that payload triggered later by unauthenticated requests to public semantic endpoints
- execute operating-system commands on the host
- gain interactive shell access to the underlying server
- pivot from application-level administration to full server compromise
This breaks the expected trust boundary between application administration and host-level execution. In practical terms, YesWiki administrator privileges become sufficient to obtain command execution on the server in affected deployments.
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| yeswiki/yeswiki | < 4.6.6 |
4.6.6 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
yeswiki/yeswiki Packagist → 4.6.6
- composer
composer require yeswiki/yeswiki:^4.6.6
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
Weakness
CWE-1336: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine
The product uses a template engine to insert or process externally-influenced input, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements or syntax that can be interpreted as template expressions or other code directives when processed by the engine.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Choose a template engine that offers a sandbox or restricted mode, or at least limits the power of any available expressions, function calls, or commands.
- Implementation: Use the template engine's sandbox or restricted mode, if available.
References
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-9369-69wj-7m2f YesWiki Vulnerable to Authenticated PHP Object Injection in BazarImportAction via unserialize | Critical | Also affects yeswiki/yeswiki |
| GHSA-4pf7-cc4r-g63h YesWiki has Authenticated SQL Injection via ReactionManager | High | Also affects yeswiki/yeswiki |
| GHSA-r5xw-gcgw-hwp5 YesWiki Vulnerable to Reflected XSS via Unescaped `id` Parameter in Bazar Widget HTML Attributes | Medium | Also affects yeswiki/yeswiki |
| GHSA-35f3-pg38-486f YesWiki Vulnerable to Reflected XSS via Unescaped Archived-Revision `time` Parameter in `handlers/page/show.php` | Medium | Also affects yeswiki/yeswiki |
| GHSA-xc7j-3g8q-9vh4 YesWiki has stored XSS in Bazar form-field templates via unescaped field.label / field.hint (|raw('html')) | Medium | Also affects yeswiki/yeswiki |
| GHSA-8f2v-2qhj-gfwg YesWiki: Second-Order SQL Injection in Page Delete API via Unescaped Page Tag (`ApiController::deletePage`) | High | Also affects yeswiki/yeswiki |
| GHSA-qg78-vmvc-fhjw YesWiki: SQL Injection possible through public Bazar entry-listing APIs via numeric `query`/`queries` filters | High | Also affects yeswiki/yeswiki |
| GHSA-vw42-752g-5mrp YesWiki has Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery via ActivityPub `Signature.keyId` | High | Also affects yeswiki/yeswiki |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor