Skip to content

GHSA-655q-9gvg-q4cm BIT-aspnet-core-2020-0603 CVE-2020-0603

Remote code execution in ASP.NET Core

High NuGet
Severity
High
The publisher's own rating, not a CVSS score
Exploit chance (EPSS)
21.17%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 97.58% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
Fix
Available
12 packages have a fixed version

Description

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in ASP.NET Core software when the software fails to handle objects in memory.An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user, aka 'ASP.NET Core Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'.

Affected versions

NuGet

PackageVulnerableFixed in
Microsoft.AspNetCore.All
>= 2.1.0, < 2.1.15
2.1.15
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App
>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.1
3.0.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App
>= 2.1.0, < 2.1.15
2.1.15
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm64
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-musl-arm64
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-musl-x64
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-x64
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.osx-x64
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-arm
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x64
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x86
>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1
3.1.1
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Connections
>= 1.0.0, < 1.0.15
1.0.15

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

Microsoft.AspNetCore.All NuGet → 2.1.15

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.All --version 2.1.15

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm64 NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm64 --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-musl-arm64 NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-musl-arm64 --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-musl-x64 NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-musl-x64 --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-x64 NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-x64 --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.osx-x64 NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.osx-x64 --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-arm NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-arm --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x64 NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x64 --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x86 NuGet → 3.1.1

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x86 --version 3.1.1

Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Connections NuGet → 1.0.15

dotnet
dotnet add package Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Connections --version 1.0.15

Weakness

CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it reads from or writes to a memory location outside the buffer's intended boundary. This may result in read or write operations on unexpected memory locations that could be linked to other variables, data structures, or internal program data.

How to prevent it
  • Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
  • Operation, Build and Compilation: Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Implementation: Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a loop and make sure there is no danger of writing past the allocated space. If necessary, truncate all input strings to a reasonable length before passing them to the copy and concatenation functions.
  • Operation, Build and Compilation: Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking. For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
  • Operation: Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX [REF-60] [REF-61]. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment. For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND [REF-1336].
  • Implementation: Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-vmch-3w2x-vhgq
.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability
High Known exploited Also affects Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x64
GHSA-f4g7-52wc-p8x7
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-96236 - ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability
High Also affects Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm
GHSA-rv87-ccxw-8ggf
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-88092 - ASP.NET Core Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
Critical Also affects Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm
GHSA-57xr-hfxx-jw5x
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-70196 - ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability
Medium Also affects Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm
GHSA-fpq8-4vhr-rcxx
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-70188 - ASP.NET Core Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
Critical Also affects Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm
GHSA-mf4x-w4gh-4656
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-70186 - ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability
High Also affects Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm
GHSA-494h-xx7x-5frh
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-70183 - ASP.NET Core Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability
High Also affects Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm
GHSA-w5qq-qrpp-rf4c
Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2026-70181 - ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability
High Also affects Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor