GHSA-5ww9-jg6q-38r7 CVE-2026-54097 GO-2026-5159
File Browser: Cross-user unauthorized share-link deletion via unbounded prefix match in DeleteWithPathPrefix
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.45%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 39.10% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
- Fix
2.63.6- Upgrade github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 to this version or later
Description
Summary
A low-privileged authenticated user of filebrowser (with create + delete permissions in their own isolated scope) can silently destroy share-link records belonging to any other user — including the administrator — by performing a legitimate DELETE on a file in their own directory whose logical path happens to be a byte-prefix of another user's stored share.Link.Path. The file contents of the victim are not exposed, but the victim's share links are irrevocably wiped.
Details
resourceDeleteHandler in http/resource.go cleans up any share records that reference a deleted file by calling:
// http/resource.go
err = d.store.Share.DeleteWithPathPrefix(file.Path)
file.Path here is the logical path from the URL of the deleting user's request (e.g. /a), not the absolute filesystem path. It is passed as-is to the bolt backend:
// storage/bolt/share.go
func (s shareBackend) DeleteWithPathPrefix(pathPrefix string) error {
var links []share.Link
if err := s.db.Prefix("Path", pathPrefix, &links); err != nil {
return err
}
for _, link := range links {
err = errors.Join(err, s.db.DeleteStruct(&share.Link{Hash: link.Hash}))
}
return err
}
Why the design contradicts this behavior. share.Link carries a UserID field and the application elsewhere treats shares as per-user owned resources. shareDeleteHandler explicitly enforces link.UserID != d.user.ID && !d.user.Perm.Admin → 403. The file-deletion side-effect path is the only location that bypasses this rule.
Impact
- Integrity: unauthorized deletion of share-link metadata belonging to arbitrary users, including administrators.
- Availability: effective denial-of-service of the share-link feature — a cooperating (or malicious) low-priv user can wipe the bulk of existing share links by iterating a short set of one- and two-character prefixes.
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser | <= 1.11.0 |
No fix yet |
| github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser | all versions |
No fix yet |
| github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 | < 2.63.6 |
2.63.6 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 Go → 2.63.6
- go
go get github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2@v2.63.6 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- None
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
Weakness
CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
- Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-833g-cqhp-h72j File Browser: Share API exposes the password hash and bypass token | Low | Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser |
| GHSA-83xp-526h-j3ww File Browser: Archive builder turns backslash filenames into path traversal (zip-slip) | Medium | Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser |
| GHSA-7rc3-g7h6-22m7 File Browser: Colliding username normalization gives two users the same home directory | High | Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser |
| GHSA-8wc8-hf36-mjh9 File Browser: ScopedFs follows a dangling symlink on write, letting a scoped user create files outside their scope | Medium | Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser |
| GHSA-fmm7-x4gx-8jhr File Browser: Out-of-scope file deletion by a Create-only scoped user via symlink-following RemoveAll in upload failure-cleanup | High | Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser |
| GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm File Browser: Authentication Bypass via Proxy Auth Header Forgery | Critical | Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser |
| GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm File Browser: Command Injection via Authentication Hook Shell Substitution (Pre-Authentication RCE) | Critical | Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser |
| GHSA-8c9q-7855-wfxq File Browser has a Command Execution Allowlist Bypass via Shell Metacharacter Injection | High | Also affects github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor