GHSA-5r5m-65gx-7vrh CVE-2023-25151 GO-2023-1546
otelhttp and otelbeego have DoS vulnerability for high cardinality metrics
- Severity
- 7.5 / 10
- High · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.97%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 62.05% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
- Fix
- Available
- 2 packages have a fixed version
Description
Impact
The v0.38.0 release of go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp uses the httpconv.ServerRequest function to annotate metric measurements for the http.server.request_content_length, http.server.response_content_length, and http.server.duration instruments.
The ServerRequest function sets the http.target attribute value to be the whole request URI (including the query string)^1. The metric instruments do not "forget" previous measurement attributes when cumulative temporality is used, this means the cardinality of the measurements allocated is directly correlated with the unique URIs handled. If the query string is constantly random, this will result in a constant increase in memory allocation that can be used in a denial-of-service attack.
Pseudo-attack:
for infinite loop {
r := generate_random_string()
do_http_request("/some/path?random="+r)
}
Patches
go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp- v0.39.0go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/astaxie/beego/otelbeego- v0.39.0
Affected versions
Go
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/astaxie/beego/otelbeego | >= 0.38.0, < 0.39.0 |
0.39.0 |
| go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp | >= 0.38.0, < 0.39.0 |
0.39.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/astaxie/beego/otelbeego Go → 0.39.0
- go
go get go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/astaxie/beego/otelbeego@v0.39.0 && go mod tidy
go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp Go → 0.39.0
- go
go get go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttp@v0.39.0 && go mod tidy
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 7.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Weakness
CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
- Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
- Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-rcjv-mgp8-qvmr OpenTelemetry-Go Contrib vulnerable to denial of service in otelhttp due to unbound cardinality metrics | High | Linked by the source |
| GHSA-cg3q-j54f-5p7p Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in promhttp | High | Linked by the source |
| GHSA-cggf-277g-3q54 pypdf has possible large memory usage when parsing page tree | High | Same weakness, CWE-400 |
| GHSA-3g3m-2fjr-6pw4 Glob: AbortSignal cancellation bypass allows post-timeout filesystem traversal | Medium | Same weakness, CWE-400 |
| GHSA-42gh-23hr-vphw pypdf has possible long runtimes when retrieving page labels | High | Same weakness, CWE-400 |
| GHSA-4vqv-7265-gm2w pypdf has possible large memory usage for exceptions in strict mode | High | Same weakness, CWE-400 |
| GHSA-62m5-6wh8-28x7 pypdf has possible long runtimes/large memory usage for encrypted PDF files | High | Same weakness, CWE-400 |
| GHSA-7wch-p9px-956x Forge: Regular expression denial of service in PEM decoding (pem.decode) | High | Same weakness, CWE-400 |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor