Skip to content

GHSA-4vxv-4xq4-p84h CVE-2026-34570

CI4MS: Account Deletion Module Grants Full Persistent Unauthorized Access for All‑Roles via Improper Session Invalidation (Logic Flaw)

High Packagist
Severity
8.8 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.51%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 43.58% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1254 Incorrect Comparison Logic Granularity
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
CWE-613 Insufficient Session Expiration
Fix
0.31.0.0
Upgrade ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to this version or later

Description

Summary

Vulnerability: Improper Session Invalidation on Account Deletion (Broken Access Control / Logic Flaw)
  • This vulnerability is caused by a backend logic flaw that maintains a false trust assumption that already-authenticated users remain trustworthy, even after their accounts are explicitly deleted. As a result, administrative security actions do not behave as intended, allowing persistent unauthorized access.
Description

The application fails to immediately revoke active user sessions when an account is deleted. Due to a logic flaw in the backend design, account state changes are enforced only during authentication (login), not for already-established sessions.

The system implicitly assumes that authenticated users remain trusted for the lifetime of their session. There is no session expiration or account expiration mechanism in place, causing deleted accounts to retain indefinite access until the user manually logs out. This behavior breaks the intended access control policy and results in persistent unauthorized access, representing a critical security flaw.

Affected Functionality
  • User session management and authentication logic
  • Account deletion mechanism
  • All authenticated endpoints, including administrative and content interfaces
Attack Scenario
  • A user logs into the application.
  • An administrator deletes the user account.
  • The user remains fully logged in and can continue performing all actions allowed by their role indefinitely, as there is no session expiration.
  • The user can continue invoking backend methods, triggering application actions, accessing sensitive interfaces (including user management if permitted), and interacting with the system as if the account were still active.
  • Access is only lost if the user manually logs out, which may never occur.
Impact
  • Unauthorized Continued Access: Deleted users retain full access indefinitely, violating intended access control and expected security behavior.
  • Bypass of Administrative Controls: Administrative actions (deletion) fail to immediately restrict active sessions.
  • Logic Flaw Resulting in Broken Behavior: Backend authorization logic relies on a flawed trust assumption that authenticated users remain valid, enforcing account state only at login.
  • Full Functional Access Retained: Deleted users can continue invoking application methods, executing actions, interacting with protected endpoints, and using the system exactly as before deletion.
  • Privilege Abuse: Users with elevated roles (moderator, editor, administrator) can continue performing privileged actions after account deletion, including accessing user management interfaces and modifying application state.
  • Service Disruption Potential: Persistent access allows attackers to disrupt services, manipulate content, or interfere with normal application operations.
  • Attack Persistence: Attackers can maintain access indefinitely, increasing the risk of data exfiltration, unauthorized modifications, or further privilege escalation.
  • False Sense of Remediation: Administrators may believe a threat has been mitigated while the deleted user remains active within the system.

Endpoint Example: Any endpoint accessible to authenticated users, including dashboards, administrative interfaces, user management pages, and API endpoints.

Steps To Reproduce (PoC)

  1. Create or use an existing user account.
  2. Log into the application using this account.
  3. From an administrative account, delete the logged-in user account.
  4. Observe that the target user remains authenticated.
  5. Verify that the user can still access protected functionality, invoke actions, and interact with the application as before.
  6. Confirm that the user only loses access after manually logging out (if they choose to do so).

Remediation

  • Immediately invalidate all active sessions when an account is deleted.
  • Enforce account status checks on every authenticated request, not only during login.
  • Introduce proper session expiration or account expiration mechanisms to prevent indefinite access.
  • Correct the backend logic flaw to ensure access control behavior aligns with intended security design and does not rely on unsafe trust assumptions.

Ready Video POC:

https://mega.nz/file/7dlUTQAB#0oXOapF5XYN4DRRG1xYj6DajmuP72MpMdsHqbVBMmWw

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
< 0.31.0.0
0.31.0.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms Packagist → 0.31.0.0

composer
composer require ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms:^0.31.0.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.8

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-1254: Incorrect Comparison Logic Granularity

The product's comparison logic is performed over a series of steps rather than across the entire string in one operation. If there is a comparison logic failure on one of these steps, the operation may be vulnerable to a timing attack that can result in the interception of the process for nefarious purposes.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: The hardware designer should ensure that comparison logic is implemented so as to compare in one operation instead in smaller chunks.

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-613: Insufficient Session Expiration

According to WASC, "Insufficient Session Expiration is when a web site permits an attacker to reuse old session credentials or session IDs for authorization."

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Set sessions/credentials expiration date.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf
CI4MS: Stored XSS in Pages Module Content via Broken html_purify Validation Rule
High Also affects ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
GHSA-245j-xjvr-xvm5
CI4MS Fileeditor allows deletion and rename of critical application files due to missing extension allowlist on destructive operations
Medium Also affects ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
GHSA-2m69-jmvh-6chr
CI4MS: Stored XSS in Blog Content via Broken `html_purify` Validation Rule
Medium Also affects ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9
CI4MS has a Deactivated User Session Bypass (active=0)
Medium Also affects ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
GHSA-vgrf-pr28-vf98
CI4MS Vulnerable to Arbitrary Database Table Drop via Theme deleteProcess
Medium Also affects ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
GHSA-fw49-9xq4-gmx6
CI4MS has Unrestricted PHP File Upload via Theme Installation that Leads to Authenticated Remote Code Execution
High Also affects ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
GHSA-xv3r-vr59-95rg
CI4MS Theme::upload is vulnerable to Zip Slip leading to RCE
Critical Also affects ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
GHSA-xp9f-pvvc-57p4
CI4MS Backup::restore is vulnerable to Zip Slip leading to RCE
Critical Also affects ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor