GHSA-4pgc-gfrr-wcmg CVE-2026-4628
Keycloak has Improper Access Control that allows attackers with valid credentials to bypass the allowRemoteResourceManagement=false
- Severity
- 4.3 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.26%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 18.13% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-284 Improper Access Control
- Fix
- None yet
- No fixed version published
Description
A flaw was found in Keycloak. An improper Access Control vulnerability in Keycloak’s User-Managed Access (UMA) resource_set endpoint allows attackers with valid credentials to bypass the allowRemoteResourceManagement=false restriction. This occurs due to incomplete enforcement of access control checks on PUT operations to the resource_set endpoint. This issue enables unauthorized modification of protected resources, impacting data integrity.
Affected versions
Maven
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| org.keycloak:keycloak-services | <= 26.6.0 |
No fix yet |
How to fix
No fixed version has been published yet. Until one is, remove or replace the package, or turn off or isolate the affected feature. This page updates when a fix ships.
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 4.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-284: Improper Access Control
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
References
Advisories
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-v3f7-2p4r-mwfw Keycloak vulnerable to cross-site scripting (xss) via case-insensitive uri validation bypass | High | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-9jrw-8xf7-xqhq Keycloak vulnerable to information disclosure through arbitrary filesystem path probing | Medium | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-w3p3-7cjg-vgfw Keycloak allows unauthorized access to resources via uma permission ticket bypass | Medium | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-f5p5-6xmx-p252 Keycloak vulnerable to authorization bypass via incorrect uri comparison | High | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-r7rc-c989-86g6 Keycloak: Attacker can re-enable and take over disabled clients via registration access token | Medium | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-4gv3-mc9p-5wqc Keycloak: Unauthenticated account takeover via reset-credentials flow bypass | Critical | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-6g26-7cx5-mrrg Keycloak: Information disclosure due to user profile permission bypass | Low | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
| GHSA-cpf7-j4cf-vqx4 Keycloak has an Out-of-bounds Read | Medium | Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor