GHSA-4hjq-422q-4vpx CVE-2021-27908
Mautic vulnerable to secret data exfiltration via symfony parameters
- Severity
- 5.8 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.34%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 28.07% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-732 Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
- CWE-74 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
- Fix
3.3.2- Upgrade mautic/core to this version or later
Description
Impact
Symfony parameters (which is what Mautic transforms configuration parameters into) can be used within other Symfony parameters by design. However, this also means that an admin who is normally not privy to certain parameters, such as database credentials, could expose them by leveraging any of the free text fields in Mautic’s configuration that are used in publicly facing parts of the application.
For example,
- Go to Configuration page -> Landing Page Settings -> Analytics script and enter this: <
script> console.log("db password is: %mautic.db_password%"); </script> - Visit any landing page and open the JS dev console. You will see the following message with real instance db password:
db password is: <real password>
Risk rating: ModerateCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Patches
Upgrade to 3.3.2
Workarounds
No
References
No
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Email us at security@mautic.org
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| mautic/core | < 3.3.2 |
3.3.2 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
mautic/core Packagist → 3.3.2
- composer
composer require mautic/core:^3.3.2
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 5.8
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
Weakness
CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
The product specifies permissions for a security-critical resource in a way that allows that resource to be read or modified by unintended actors.
How to prevent it
- Implementation: When using a critical resource such as a configuration file, check to see if the resource has insecure permissions (such as being modifiable by any regular user) [REF-62], and generate an error or even exit the software if there is a possibility that the resource could have been modified by an unauthorized party.
- Architecture and Design: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully defining distinct user groups, privileges, and/or roles. Map these against data, functionality, and the related resources. Then set the permissions accordingly. This will allow you to maintain more fine-grained control over your resources. [REF-207]
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
- Implementation, Installation: During program startup, explicitly set the default permissions or umask to the most restrictive setting possible. Also set the appropriate permissions during program installation. This will prevent you from inheriting insecure permissions from any user who installs or runs the program.
- System Configuration: For all configuration files, executables, and libraries, make sure that they are only readable and writable by the software's administrator.
- Documentation: Do not suggest insecure configuration changes in documentation, especially if those configurations can extend to resources and other programs that are outside the scope of the application.
- Installation: Do not assume that a system administrator will manually change the configuration to the settings that are recommended in the software's manual.
- Operation, System Configuration: Ensure that the software runs properly under the United States Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB) [REF-199] or an equivalent hardening configuration guide, which many organizations use to limit the attack surface and potential risk of deployed software.
- Implementation, System Configuration, Operation: When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to disable public access.
CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
The product constructs all or part of a command, data structure, or record using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify how it is parsed or interpreted when it is sent to a downstream component.
How to prevent it
- Requirements: Programming languages and supporting technologies might be chosen which are not subject to these issues.
- Implementation: Utilize an appropriate mix of allowlist and denylist parsing to filter control-plane syntax from all input.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-5hvg-w58j-545m Mautic has Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Project Option Selector | Medium | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-7h65-whp7-rgqf Mautic has Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Projects Component | High | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-2jrw-c95w-h43g Mautic has an Authorization Bypass in API v2 Endpoints | High | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-6r9h-4h75-7q4x Mautic vulnerable to Path Traversal via Campaign Import | Critical | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-9fx4-7cmj-47vg Mautic has Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) in Theme Templates | Critical | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-jmv8-8j9j-rcpc Mautic Focus component Vulnerable to SSRF | Medium | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-fcmw-wx57-9p75 Mautic has SQL Injection in API Contact Filtering | High | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-r5j5-q42h-fc93 Mautic is Vulnerable to SQL Injection through Contact Activity API Sorting | High | Also affects mautic/core |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor