Skip to content

GHSA-4h34-v6r8-mmjc CVE-2026-68520 PYSEC-2026-3664

Glances: as_dict_secure() Value-Level Bypass Leaks Credentials in URL Values via /api/4/config

Medium PyPI
Severity
5.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.40%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 34.82% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Fix
4.5.6
Upgrade glances to this version or later

Description

Summary

Glances provides as_dict_secure() explicitly designed for unauthenticated API access, with a docstring stating it returns "a sanitised copy of the configuration dict" where "Sensitive keys in remaining sections are replaced by '********'". However, the implementation only checks KEY names against a regex pattern and never inspects VALUE content. The documented [ip] config section supports public_api (URL), public_username (login), and public_password (password). While public_password is correctly masked, both public_api (when containing embedded credentials like https://user:pass@host/) and public_username are returned in full to unauthenticated users via GET /api/4/config.

Affected Versions

Glances latest (Docker: nicolargo/glances:latest)

Root Cause

In glances/config.py, as_dict_secure():

_SECURE_SENSITIVE_KEY_RE = re.compile(r"password|token|secret|api_key|apikey|ssl_keyfile", re.IGNORECASE)

def as_dict_secure(self):
    """Return a sanitised copy of the configuration dict.
    Intended for unauthenticated API access.
    - Sensitive keys in remaining sections are replaced by '********'.
    """
    sanitized = {}
    for section, options in self.as_dict().items():
        if section in _SECURE_BLOCKED_SECTIONS: continue
        sanitized[section] = {
            key: "********" if _SECURE_SENSITIVE_KEY_RE.search(key) else value
            for key, value in options.items()
        }
    return sanitized

In glances/outputs/glances_restful_api.py:

# Line 1294
args_json = self.config.as_dict() if self.args.password else self.config.as_dict_secure()

The [ip] config section documents: public_api (URL), public_username (login), public_password (password).

  • public_password → matches "password" → masked ✓
  • public_api → no match → returned in full (contains user:pass@ in URL) ✗
  • public_username → no match → returned in full ✗

Impact

  • Unauthenticated credential disclosure via GET /api/4/config or GET /api/4/config/ip
  • as_dict_secure() exists specifically to protect credentials in no-auth mode but fails to mask public_username and credential-bearing URLs in public_api

Prerequisites

  • Glances in web server mode without --password (default, no auth)
  • glances.conf [ip] section with public_api containing embedded credentials and/or public_username set

Environment

  • Glances latest (Docker: nicolargo/glances:latest)
  • Remote Docker lab at http://10.140.200.102:8080

Reproduction Steps

docker run -d --name glances-test -p 8080:61208 -e GLANCES_OPT='-w' nicolargo/glances:latest
sleep 20
docker exec glances-test sed -i 's|public_api=https://ipv4.ipleak.net/json/|public_api=https://admin:secret123@ipv4.ipleak.net/json/|' /etc/glances/glances.conf
docker exec glances-test sed -i 's|#public_username=<myname>|public_username=myname|' /etc/glances/glances.conf
docker exec glances-test sed -i 's|#public_password=<mysecret>|public_password=mysecret|' /etc/glances/glances.conf
docker restart glances-test
sleep 15
curl -s "$TARGET/api/4/config/ip"
# Returns: {"public_api": "https://admin:secret123@...", "public_username": "myname", "public_password": "********"}

Evidence

See C:/Tools/glances-config-leak-evidence.txt.

Dedup Check

  • GHSA-gfc2-9qmw-w7vh covers CORS but NOT value-level credential leak
  • No existing GHSA covers as_dict_secure() value-level filtering gap
  • 13 published GHSA, none covering this issue

Suggested Remediation

Add "username" and "login" to sensitive key pattern, and check values for embedded credentials in URLs.

Disclosure Timeline

  • 2026-07-28: Vulnerability discovered and verified via Docker deployment

Reporter

GitHub username: Todor

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
glances
< 4.5.6
4.5.6

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

glances PyPI → 4.5.6

pip
pip install --upgrade "glances>=4.5.6"
poetry
poetry add "glances>=4.5.6"
uv
uv add "glances>=4.5.6"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-59fj-m2j6-hcxh
Glances: `--disable-config-exec` does not cover on-alert action commands (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-53925)
High Also affects glances
GHSA-73wf-9vmv-5pv9
Glances: Incomplete fix of CVE-2026-32608: action-template sanitizer is bypassed by nested stat values (process 'cmdline') → OS command injection
High Also affects glances
GHSA-fp27-88fp-2phg
Glances: REST API CORS Credentials Guard Uses Exact-Match Instead of Membership Test — Bypassed by Any Multi-Origin Allowlist Containing the Wildcard
Medium Also affects glances
GHSA-qcpp-8x79-hhp3
Glances has a command injection bypass of action-template sanitizer via cross-field shell-operator reconstruction
High Also affects glances
GHSA-3vwc-qwhc-3mj7
Glances has arbitrary file write and command execution via `secure_popen` redirection and chaining operators in AMP command configuration
High Also affects glances
GHSA-w856-8p3r-p338
Glances: XML-RPC Server Missing Host Header Validation Enables DNS Rebinding Attack
Medium Also affects glances
GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr
Glances: XML-RPC Multi-Origin CORS Configuration Silently Falls Back to Wildcard (Incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-33533)
High Also affects glances
GHSA-9837-48hr-q32j
Glances has Insecure Pickle Deserialization in its Version Cache that Leads to Arbitrary Code Execution
High Also affects glances
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor