Skip to content

GHSA-49xv-9743-pw8w CVE-2026-77265 PYSEC-2026-4083

MCP Atlassian: SSRF via DNS Rebinding in Header-Based Authentication Flow

High PyPI
Severity
5.9 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.29%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 21.71% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Fix
0.22.0
Upgrade mcp-atlassian to this version or later

Description

Summary

The SSRF protection for header-based authentication uses a validate-then-use pattern vulnerable to DNS rebinding. validate_url_for_ssrf resolves the hostname via DNS and checks that the resolved IP is globally routable. However, the actual HTTP request happens later, during which the DNS record may have changed to point to an internal IP (127.0.0.1, 169.254.169.254, etc.). The SSRF redirect hook only validates redirect targets, not the initial connection.

Details

The vulnerability spans main.py (validation) and dependencies.py (use).

Step 1 -- URL validation at middleware time:

In src/mcp_atlassian/servers/main.py:524-531, the URL from X-Atlassian-Jira-Url is validated:

if jira_url_str:
    ssrf_error = validate_url_for_ssrf(jira_url_str)
    if ssrf_error:
        # blocked

validate_url_for_ssrf (src/mcp_atlassian/utils/urls.py:113-116) resolves DNS and checks is_global:

dns_error = _check_dns_resolution(hostname)
if dns_error:
    return dns_error

Step 2 -- HTTP request happens later with a separate DNS resolution:

In src/mcp_atlassian/servers/dependencies.py:544-562, a JiraFetcher is created with the attacker URL and makes HTTP requests to it. The SSRF redirect hook (attach_ssrf_hook=True) is applied but only checks redirect Location headers, not the initial connection target.

DNS rebinding timeline:

  1. Attacker sets up rebind.attacker.com with short TTL (1 second)
  2. First DNS resolution (validate_url_for_ssrf): returns 1.2.3.4 (public) -- passes
  3. TTL expires
  4. Second DNS resolution (requests.get): returns 169.254.169.254 (metadata)
  5. HTTP request reaches internal IP, bypassing the SSRF check

PoC

Use a DNS rebinding service like rbndr.us. Send a request with X-Atlassian-Jira-Url set to a rebinding hostname (e.g., rebind-169.254.169.254-1.2.3.4.rbndr.us) and X-Atlassian-Jira-Personal-Token set to any value. With approximately 50% probability per attempt, the request reaches the internal metadata service.

Impact

  • Cloud metadata access: Steal IAM credentials via 169.254.169.254
  • Internal network scanning: Proxy requests to internal services
  • AC:H: DNS rebinding is probabilistic and requires multiple attempts
  • Limited to header_pat branch: Only affects deployments accepting header-based PAT authentication

Recommended Fix

Pin DNS resolution: resolve the hostname once during validation, then connect to the resolved IP directly (with the original hostname in the Host header). This eliminates the TOCTOU gap between validation and use.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
mcp-atlassian
< 0.22.0
0.22.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

mcp-atlassian PyPI → 0.22.0

pip
pip install --upgrade "mcp-atlassian>=0.22.0"
poetry
poetry add "mcp-atlassian>=0.22.0"
uv
uv add "mcp-atlassian>=0.22.0"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 5.9

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-g2r2-3j32-j27x
MCP Atlassian: Reflected XSS in OAuth Setup Callback Handler
Medium Also affects mcp-atlassian
GHSA-h7wj-5v37-59r2
MCP Atlassian: Path traversal in upload_attachment allows arbitrary file read (incomplete fix for CVE-2026-27825)
Medium Also affects mcp-atlassian
GHSA-4596-2p6p-28cv
MCP Atlassian: Insecure File Permissions on OAuth Token Storage
Medium Also affects mcp-atlassian
GHSA-mfv2-4wvm-9pgp
MCP Atlassian: Path traversal in upload_attachment allows arbitrary file read and exfiltration via MCP tool call
Medium Also affects mcp-atlassian
GHSA-p6hp-93wp-fh6p
MCP Atlassian: Path Traversal / Arbitrary File Read in confluence_upload_attachment MCP tool (incomplete fix of GHSA-xjgw-4wvw-rgm4)
High Also affects mcp-atlassian
GHSA-6cr4-ccf3-x7h4
MCP Atlassian: Arbitrary file read via confluence_upload_attachment allows exfiltration of server credentials
High Also affects mcp-atlassian
GHSA-mrq8-fv7v-hhjg
MCP Atlassian: HTTP upload tools accept arbitrary server-local file paths
Medium Also affects mcp-atlassian
GHSA-2xj6-xx86-cwwc
MCP Atlassian: Arbitrary File Read & Exfiltration (Confused Deputy) in JIRA update_issue
High Also affects mcp-atlassian
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor