Skip to content

GHSA-4487-j8r4-4g2f CVE-2026-118780

Forge: verifyCertificateChain() removes trusted CA certificates with the same subject from the CA store

Low npm
Severity
3.7 / 10
Low · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.17%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 6.59% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation
CWE-471 Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID)
Fix
1.4.1
Upgrade node-forge to this version or later

Description

Summary

When a CA store created by pki.createCaStore() holds two or more certificates with the same subject name, pki.verifyCertificateChain() permanently removes those certificates from the store while trying each one as the issuer. A peer can send any certificate that names that subject as its issuer to make all later verifications against those CA certificates fail. Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1.

Details

pki.verifyCertificateChain() (lib/x509.js) asks the CA store for the issuer of each certificate with caStore.getIssuer(). When the store holds several certificates with the same subject, caStore.getIssuer() returns the store's own internal array of those certificates (caStore.certs[hash], built by addCertificate()). verifyCertificateChain() used that array directly as its list of candidate parents and called parents.shift() on it while trying each candidate. Every candidate it tried, including the one that finally verified the certificate, was removed from the store.

Once the array is empty, getIssuer() returns an empty list, no candidate is tried, and verification fails with "Certificate signature is invalid." hasCertificate() and listAllCertificates() no longer see the removed certificates. The store stays in this state for as long as the object is used.

The attacker's certificate only needs an issuer name equal to the shared subject name, which is public. Its signature and key can be arbitrary: every candidate is tried and shifted out because none verifies, and errors from parent.verify() are caught by the loop. Verification of the attacker's chain fails as expected. Verifying valid chains has a similar effect: the CA certificate that verified the chain and any tried before it are removed.

No chain is accepted that should be rejected. Removing candidates can only turn a success into a failure.

RFC 5280, Section 6.1.1(d) treats trust anchor information as an input to path validation. Validation should not consume it.

The fix copies the array returned by getIssuer() before iterating over it, so the CA store is no longer modified. getIssuer() itself is unchanged.

Patches

Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1. pki.verifyCertificateChain() now works on a copy of the candidate issuer list instead of shifting entries out of the CA store.

Workarounds

  • Pass a fresh CA store to each pki.verifyCertificateChain() call (for example pki.createCaStore(trustedCerts)), or pass caStore to forge.tls.createConnection() as an array of certificates instead of a store object, so that forge creates a new store per connection.

  • Or wrap the store so that getIssuer() returns a copy:

    var getIssuer = caStore.getIssuer;
    caStore.getIssuer = function(cert) {
      var r = getIssuer(cert);
      return Array.isArray(r) ? r.slice() : r;
    };
    

Proof of concept

Two trusted self-signed CA certificates, rootA and rootB, share the subject CN=Root. bogus is any certificate whose issuer is CN=Root, signed with an unrelated key. leafA is a valid certificate issued by rootA.

var caStore = forge.pki.createCaStore([rootA, rootB]);
caStore.listAllCertificates().length;  // 2
try { forge.pki.verifyCertificateChain(caStore, [bogus]); } catch(e) {}
// rejected as expected ("Certificate signature is invalid.")
caStore.listAllCertificates().length;  // 0: both CA certificates are gone
forge.pki.verifyCertificateChain(caStore, [leafA]);
// throws "Certificate signature is invalid." (valid chain now rejected)

Without the attacker certificate, verifying leafA twice against a fresh store gives the same result: the first call succeeds and removes rootA, the second fails. With the fix, the store keeps both certificates and every valid chain verifies. The regression tests are in tests/unit/x509.js ("CA store" section).

Impact

Applications that keep a long-lived CA store holding several trusted certificates with the same subject name, and that verify certificate chains received from other parties with pki.verifyCertificateChain(). This includes forge.tls clients that pass the same caStore object to several connections. Duplicate subject names occur with re-keyed or renewed CAs that kept their name, or a CA next to a cross-signed version of itself, mostly in private PKIs.

A remote, unauthenticated peer (for example a malicious TLS server or a party submitting a signed document) can send a certificate naming the shared subject as its issuer. This removes every certificate with that subject from the store, so later verifications of valid chains issued by those CA certificates fail until the store is recreated. This is a persistent denial of service for certificate verification against those CA certificates. Verification against other trusted CAs keeps working, no invalid chain is accepted, and stores without duplicate subject names are not affected.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
node-forge
<= 1.4.0
No fix yet
node-forge
< 1.4.1
1.4.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

node-forge npm → 1.4.1

npm
npm install node-forge@1.4.1
yarn
yarn add node-forge@1.4.1
pnpm
pnpm add node-forge@1.4.1

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 3.7

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation

The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
  • Implementation: If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.

CWE-471: Modification of Assumed-Immutable Data (MAID)

The product does not properly protect an assumed-immutable element from being modified by an attacker.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation, Implementation: When the data is stored or transmitted through untrusted sources that could modify the data, implement integrity checks to detect unauthorized modification, or store/transmit the data in a trusted location that is free from external influence.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-4642-5mcj-2rqw
Forge: ASN.1 OID first arc truncation in asn1.oidToDer
Low Also affects node-forge
GHSA-6wvx-3r32-xmcg
Forge: Prototype Pollution in forge.http cookie handling via a malicious Set-Cookie
Medium Also affects node-forge
GHSA-525v-9gp9-w22h
Forge: TLS client crash when the server sends no certificate
Medium Also affects node-forge
GHSA-7wch-p9px-956x
Forge: Regular expression denial of service in PEM decoding (pem.decode)
High Also affects node-forge
GHSA-h6cr-wjv9-3cpp
Forge: Denial of Service via infinite loop in BigInteger.modInverse() with negative input (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-33891)
Low Also affects node-forge
GHSA-5cwg-6vw7-rj6p
Forge: AES-GCM authentication bypass via unvalidated tagLength option
Medium Also affects node-forge
GHSA-jc66-7q78-782g
Forge: PKCS#12 MAC forgery and constant-key PBE via zero iteration count
High Also affects node-forge
GHSA-8hrf-8g6f-7xwp
Forge: Denial of service in TLS record processing via a record interleaved with a fragmented handshake message
High Also affects node-forge

Credits: pravichandran15

Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor