Skip to content

GHSA-3x5j-9vwr-8rr5 CVE-2023-25823 PYSEC-2023-16

Update share links to use FRP instead of SSH tunneling

Medium PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.55%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 46.18% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-798 Use of Hard-coded Credentials
Fix
3.13.1
Upgrade gradio to this version or later

Description

Impact

This is a vulnerability which affects anyone using Gradio's share links (i.e. creating a Gradio app and then setting share=True) with Gradio versions older than 3.13.1. In these older versions of Gradio, a private SSH key is sent to any user that connects to the Gradio machine, which means that a user could access other users' shared Gradio demos. From there, other exploits are possible depending on the level of access/exposure the Gradio app provides.

Patches

The problem has been patched. Ideally, users should upgrade to gradio==3.19.1 or later where the FRP solution has been properly tested.

Credit

Credit to Greg Sadetsky and Samuel Tremblay-Cossette for alerting the team

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
gradio
< 3.13.1
3.13.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

gradio PyPI → 3.13.1

pip
pip install --upgrade "gradio>=3.13.1"
poetry
poetry add "gradio>=3.13.1"
uv
uv add "gradio>=3.13.1"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
Low
Availability (vulnerable system)
Low
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
Low
Availability (subsequent systems)
Low

CVSS 3.1 5.4

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials

The product contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: For outbound authentication: store passwords, keys, and other credentials outside of the code in a strongly-protected, encrypted configuration file or database that is protected from access by all outsiders, including other local users on the same system. Properly protect the key (CWE-320). If you cannot use encryption to protect the file, then make sure that the permissions are as restrictive as possible [REF-7]. In Windows environments, the Encrypted File System (EFS) may provide some protection.
  • Architecture and Design: For inbound authentication: Rather than hard-code a default username and password, key, or other authentication credentials for first time logins, utilize a "first login" mode that requires the user to enter a unique strong password or key.
  • Architecture and Design: If the product must contain hard-coded credentials or they cannot be removed, perform access control checks and limit which entities can access the feature that requires the hard-coded credentials. For example, a feature might only be enabled through the system console instead of through a network connection.
  • Architecture and Design: For inbound authentication using passwords: apply strong one-way hashes to passwords and store those hashes in a configuration file or database with appropriate access control. That way, theft of the file/database still requires the attacker to try to crack the password. When handling an incoming password during authentication, take the hash of the password and compare it to the saved hash. Use randomly assigned salts for each separate hash that is generated. This increases the amount of computation that an attacker needs to conduct a brute-force attack, possibly limiting the effectiveness of the rainbow table method.
  • Architecture and Design: For front-end to back-end connections: Three solutions are possible, although none are complete. The first suggestion involves the use of generated passwords or keys that are changed automatically and must be entered at given time intervals by a system administrator. These passwords will be held in memory and only be valid for the time intervals. Next, the passwords or keys should be limited at the back end to only performing actions valid for the front end, as opposed to having full access. Finally, the messages sent should be tagged and checksummed with time sensitive values so as to prevent replay-style attacks.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-j36p-7w88-g82j
Gradio FileExplorer preprocess path traversal allows files outside root_dir to reach callbacks
High Also affects gradio
GHSA-6655-8ph2-63j3
Gradio: Audio cache key ignores metadata when saving numpy audio outputs
Low Also affects gradio
GHSA-7hp7-4p35-3cx2
Gradio contains a cookie injection vulnerability
Medium Also affects gradio
GHSA-jmh7-g254-2cq9
Gradio has SSRF via Malicious `proxy_url` Injection in `gr.load()` Config Processing
High Also affects gradio
GHSA-pfjf-5gxr-995x
Gradio has an Open Redirect in its OAuth Flow
Medium Also affects gradio
GHSA-39mp-8hj3-5c49
Gradio is Vulnerable to Absolute Path Traversal on Windows with Python 3.13+
High Also affects gradio
GHSA-h3h8-3v2v-rg7m
Gradio: Mocked OAuth Login Exposes Server Credentials and Uses Hardcoded Session Secret
Medium Also affects gradio
GHSA-8jw3-6x8j-v96g
Gradio Allows Unauthorized File Copy via Path Manipulation
High Also affects gradio
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor