GHSA-3wp3-xxj9-5jqq CVE-2026-59213 PYSEC-2026-3589
Open WebUI: Cross-user model-list exposure via static cache key in get_all_models (aiocache key= vs key_builder= misuse)
- Severity
- 3.5 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 3.1
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.37%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 31.24% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-524 Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information
- Fix
0.10.0- Upgrade open-webui to this version or later
Description
Summary
The get_all_models handlers in routers/openai.py and routers/ollama.py intended to cache their permission-filtered model lists per user, but the @cached decorator was misconfigured: it passed a key= lambda instead of key_builder=. In aiocache 0.12.3 (the pinned version), key= is a static cache key — a callable passed there is used as a constant object, not invoked per call. As a result the per-user key was never computed, and all callers collided onto a single shared cache entry within the TTL window. During that window, one user's permission-filtered model list could be served to a different authenticated user, crossing the per-user authorization boundary.
Impact
- Boundary crossed: Confidentiality (cross-user). A caller can receive the model list scoped to a different security principal than themselves.
- A user (or admin, or — depending on endpoint reachability — anonymous caller) who populates the cache causes the next caller within the TTL to receive that list rather than their own permission-filtered one.
- What's disclosed is the set of models another principal can access, including potentially the existence and naming of models restricted from the receiving user.
- Exposure is incidental and timing-dependent, not attacker-controlled: the leaked entry is whatever the most recent caller populated within
MODELS_CACHE_TTL(default 1 second), and the attacker cannot select the victim or force a target's list into the cache.
Affected component
backend/open_webui/routers/openai.py—get_all_models(~line 488)backend/open_webui/routers/ollama.py—get_all_models(~line 302)
Both decorated with @cached(ttl=MODELS_CACHE_TTL, key=lambda ...). No other @cached(... key=lambda ...) misuse was found elsewhere in the backend.
Root cause
aiocache 0.12's @cached treats key= as a static key; the per-call hook is key_builder= with signature key_builder(func, *args, **kwargs). Passing a callable to key= uses the callable object itself as a constant key, so every invocation resolved to the same entry and the intended per-user.id namespacing never occurred.
Reproduction (default config)
- On a default deployment, configure at least two users with different model-access permissions (e.g. one model restricted to user A).
- As user A, request the model list (populates the shared cache entry).
- Within
MODELS_CACHE_TTL(default 1s), as user B, request the model list. - User B receives user A's permission-filtered list, including models B is not permitted to see.
Remediation
Replace key= with key_builder= at both call sites and adjust the lambda to take the function as its first argument:
@cached(
ttl=MODELS_CACHE_TTL,
key_builder=lambda _func, request, user=None: (
f'openai_all_models_{user.id}' if user else 'openai_all_models'
),
)
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| open-webui | >= 0.6.27, < 0.10.0 |
0.10.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
open-webui PyPI → 0.10.0
- pip
pip install --upgrade "open-webui>=0.10.0"- poetry
poetry add "open-webui>=0.10.0"- uv
uv add "open-webui>=0.10.0"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 3.1 3.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-524: Use of Cache Containing Sensitive Information
The code uses a cache that contains sensitive information, but the cache can be read by an actor outside of the intended control sphere.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Protect information stored in cache.
- Architecture and Design: Do not store unnecessarily sensitive information in the cache.
- Architecture and Design: Consider using encryption in the cache.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-wvm9-9g5j-623f Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth role policy can still sign in via token exchange | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-4qg5-cxx4-g927 Open WebUI: Users denied by the OAuth domain allowlist or role policy can still sign in via token exchange | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-jqhh-cjmq-vmv6 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via a cyclic chat message history | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-5x7x-4c3c-qf5w Open WebUI: Server-side fetches reach blocked and internal hosts via unvalidated HTTP redirect targets | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-34r3-9m95-vq73 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can reach the Azure platform channel via server-side web fetch | High | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-2724-6cpj-gf3v Open WebUI: Non-admin users can delete admin-owned external knowledge connections via knowledge base deletion | High | Also affects open-webui |
| GHSA-3pf7-q2g3-wj28 Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can inject chats into another user's folder via chat completions | Medium | Also affects open-webui |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor