Skip to content

GHSA-3w32-23wj-rxg3 CVE-2026-50282

Craft CMS Vulnerable to Unauthorized Deletion of Destination Folders During Forced Moves

High Packagist
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.35%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 28.73% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-862 Missing Authorization
Fix
5.9.21
Upgrade craftcms/cms to this version or later

Description

We have identified an authorization issue in Craft CMS where a forced folder move can delete a conflicting destination folder without destination delete permission.

Description

Craft CMS’s craft\\controllers\\AssetsController::actionMoveFolder() supports moving an asset folder into a destination parent folder. If a folder with the same name already exists at the destination, the action can be called with force=true to overwrite the destination.

The permission checks for this action allow:

  • deleteAssets:<sourceVolumeUid> for the folder being moved
  • createFolders:<destVolumeUid> for the destination parent folder
  • saveAssets:<destVolumeUid> for the destination parent folder

The action does not require deleteAssets on the destination volume or destination conflict folder. When force=true and a name conflict exists, the code deletes the destination folder to resolve the conflict.

$this->requireVolumePermissionByFolder('deleteAssets', $folderToMove);
$this->requireVolumePermissionByFolder('createFolders', $destinationFolder);
$this->requireVolumePermissionByFolder('saveAssets', $destinationFolder);

src/controllers/AssetsController.php:L751-L753

Indexed destination conflicts are deleted via the Assets service:

$assets->deleteFoldersByIds($existingFolder->id);

src/controllers/AssetsController.php:L798-L798

Unindexed destination conflicts are deleted directly in the volume filesystem:

$targetVolume->deleteDirectory(rtrim($destinationFolder->path, '/') . '/' . $folderToMove->name);

src/controllers/AssetsController.php:L815

Impact

A user who cannot delete assets in a destination volume can still delete a destination folder and its contents by triggering a forced move into a conflicting name. This can cause asset loss, broken references in entries and fields that point to deleted assets, and operational disruption.

Affected versions

Packagist

PackageVulnerableFixed in
craftcms/cms
>= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.9.21
5.9.21
craftcms/cms
>= 4.0.0-RC1, < 4.17.14
4.17.14

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

craftcms/cms Packagist → 5.9.21

composer
composer require craftcms/cms:^5.9.21

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-862: Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
  • Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
  • System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-7vrx-9684-xrf2
Craft CMS stores arbitrary content provided by unauthenticated users in session files
Medium Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-f3gw-9ww9-jmc3
Craft CMS Allows Remote Code Execution
Critical Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-x684-96hh-833x
Craft CMS has a potential RCE with a compromised security key
High Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-2p6p-9rc9-62j9
Craft CMS has potential RCE when PHP `register_argc_argv` config setting is enabled
Critical Known exploited Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-wg23-69c2-gjc8
Craft CMS: Passkey login accepts replayed WebAuthn assertions
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-957r-qf9p-67xw
Craft CMS: Arbitrary file read via SplFileObject in non-sandboxed template contexts
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-596p-6jv8-775v
Craft CMS: Authenticated leak of secret environment variables
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
GHSA-xxpx-f366-4xpq
Craft CMS: Authorization bypass: view-only Categories user can modify category structure via structures/move-element
Medium Also affects craftcms/cms
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor