Skip to content

GHSA-3hmw-8mw3-rmpj CVE-2026-24768

NocoDB has Unvalidated Redirect in Login Flow via continueAfterSignIn Parameter

Medium npm
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.31%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 23.40% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-601 URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')
Fix
0.301.0
Upgrade nocodb to this version or later

Description

Summary

An unvalidated redirect (open redirect) vulnerability exists in NocoDB’s login flow due to missing validation of the continueAfterSignIn parameter.

During authentication, NocoDB processes a user-controlled redirect value and conditionally performs client-side navigation without enforcing any restrictions on the destination’s origin, domain or protocol. This allows attackers to redirect authenticated users to arbitrary external websites after login.

Root Cause

The redirect logic relies on a permissive URL check that treats any absolute or protocol-relative URL as safe, and performs navigation without applying an allowlist or origin validation.

In the redirect plugin:

  • The helper function isFullUrl uses the following regular expression:

    /^(https?:)?\/\//
    

    This pattern matches any HTTP(S) URL as well as protocol-relative URLs (e.g., //evil.example), without restricting allowed domains.

  • When the continueAfterSignIn query parameter matches this pattern, the application performs an unconditional external navigation:

    navigateTo(route.value.query.continueAfterSignIn as string, {
      external: isFullUrl(...)
    })
    

Attack Scenario

An attacker can exploit this issue through a phishing attack:

  1. The attacker crafts a malicious login URL containing a controlled redirect target, for example:

    https://victim-nocodb.example/#/signin?continueAfterSignIn=https://evil-phishing.com/fake-login
    
  2. The victim clicks the link and is presented with the legitimate NocoDB login page.

  3. The victim authenticates using valid credentials.

  4. After login, NocoDB automatically redirects the victim to the attacker-controlled external site.

  5. The attacker’s site displays a fake error message and prompts the victim to re-enter credentials.

  6. The victim unknowingly submits credentials to the attacker.

Impact

This vulnerability enables phishing attacks by leveraging user trust in the legitimate NocoDB login flow. While it does not directly expose credentials or bypass authentication, it increases the likelihood of credential theft through social engineering.

The issue does not allow arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation, but it undermines authentication integrity.

Credit

This issue was discovered by an AI agent developed by the GitHub Security Lab and reviewed by GHSL team members @p- (Peter Stöckli) and @m-y-mo (Man Yue Mo).

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
nocodb
< 0.301.0
0.301.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

nocodb npm → 0.301.0

npm
npm install nocodb@0.301.0
yarn
yarn add nocodb@0.301.0
pnpm
pnpm add nocodb@0.301.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
None
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None
Exploit maturity
Proof of concept

CVSS 3.1 6.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect')

The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. Use a list of approved URLs or domains to be used for redirection.
  • Architecture and Design: Use an intermediate disclaimer page that provides the user with a clear warning that they are leaving the current site. Implement a long timeout before the redirect occurs, or force the user to click on the link. Be careful to avoid XSS problems (CWE-79) when generating the disclaimer page.
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "/login.asp" and ID 2 could map to "http://www.example.com/". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-45] provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that no externally-supplied requests are honored by requiring that all redirect requests include a unique nonce generated by the application [REF-483]. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330).
  • Architecture and Design, Implementation: Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls. Many open redirect problems occur because the programmer assumed that certain inputs could not be modified, such as cookies and hidden form fields.
  • Operation: Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-hmcr-rmjq-47qr
NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Spreadsheet Import Endpoint
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4
NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Base Migration URL
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-6mhr-74x2-98v9
NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Secure Attachment
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-r989-7g3j-wjhw
NocoDB: Refresh Tokens Persist Through Password Recovery
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-gprh-27j3-g5h4
NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Spreadsheet Fetch URL
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-g72g-r7m4-9x4g
NocoDB: OAuth Tokens Persist Through Security Events
Medium Also affects nocodb
GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q
NocoDB: Missing Ownership Check in MCP Attachment Read
Low Also affects nocodb
GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg
NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Form View Redirect URL
High Also affects nocodb
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor