GHSA-3fq7-c5m8-g86x CVE-2025-13828
Mautic user without privileged access to the Marketplace can install and uninstall composer packages
Critical
Packagist
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.25%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 16.16% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Fix
4.4.18- Upgrade mautic/core to this version or later
Description
Summary
A non privileged user can install and remove arbitrary packages via composer for a composer based installed, even if the flag in update settings for enable composer based update is unticked.
Impact
A low-privileged user of the platform can install malicious code to obtain higher privileges.
Affected versions
Packagist
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| mautic/core | >= 4.0.0, < 4.4.18 |
4.4.18 |
| mautic/core | >= 5.0.0, < 5.2.9 |
5.2.9 |
| mautic/core | >= 6.0.0, < 6.0.7 |
6.0.7 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
mautic/core Packagist → 4.4.18
- composer
composer require mautic/core:^4.4.18
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- Present
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- High
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- High
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- High
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- High
Weakness
CWE-284: Improper Access Control
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CWE-862: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor [REF-7].
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
- Architecture and Design: For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.
- System Configuration, Installation: Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-5hvg-w58j-545m Mautic has Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Project Option Selector | Medium | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-7h65-whp7-rgqf Mautic has Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Projects Component | High | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-2jrw-c95w-h43g Mautic has an Authorization Bypass in API v2 Endpoints | High | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-6r9h-4h75-7q4x Mautic vulnerable to Path Traversal via Campaign Import | Critical | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-9fx4-7cmj-47vg Mautic has Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) in Theme Templates | Critical | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-jmv8-8j9j-rcpc Mautic Focus component Vulnerable to SSRF | Medium | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-fcmw-wx57-9p75 Mautic has SQL Injection in API Contact Filtering | High | Also affects mautic/core |
| GHSA-r5j5-q42h-fc93 Mautic is Vulnerable to SQL Injection through Contact Activity API Sorting | High | Also affects mautic/core |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor